From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> To: Martin Weinberg > Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:29:19 +0000 i think any mention of the word civil should be left out. what the palintiffs have done is immaterial... the criminal dicsussion should be pure,, what did both you and i intend this is what we certainly thought the agreement was. We would like to avoid and shortcut the inevitable which is a court or other third party trying to decipher our intentions. and we find it hard to bleive that we all will not become witnesses. some of our obligations( no mention of the other side) needs to be clarified. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Martin Weinberg E> wrote: a modified draft cover letter incorporating JE wisdom that MV is more likely to meet with us in context of NPA than to monitor civil pleadings Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, PC 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston. MA _02116 a... SEEKER ERR ERK RIA RE IKEA ERIE IAEA SEE AEE IESE AISA IEA AHA AAAI AAAI This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, I. and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. ERIK RIK ERIK IIR EIFS IASI AIEEE IAHBE ISIE SHES ISAIAH ASI AEIA AAA EFTA00880953