CFN 20160083888 Filing # 38680745 E-Filed 03/07/2016 01:10:39 PM OR BK 28155 PG 1710 RECORDED 03/10/2016 15:39:22 Paim Beach County, Florida AMT Sharon R. Bock CLERK & COMPTROLLER Pgs 1710-1711; (2Pgs) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 2010CA019300 Division: AN Stephen A. Alexander, Plaintiff, ” vs. Michael T. Hardman, Defendent Plaintiff's Motion for Final Summary Judgment is scheduled for hearing on March 9, 2016. Based upon the pleadings, records, documents filed by counsel, and the agreement of the parties, the Court finds that Plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Final Summary Judgment should be GRANTED. The Cour: finds that ther: is no geruine isso: of weaterial fice via respect to the following facts: 1. Plaintiff was the originating lender and has held the note attached as Exhibit “A” to the Motion for Summary Judgment since June 5, 2009; 2. The note was payable upon the sale, transfer, or assignment, or further encumbrance of any assets in which Michael T. Hardman, solely or as 2 tenant by the entirety has an interest. 3. The official records of Palm Beach County, Florida show that defendant transferred by special warranty deed certain real property to SGRK Properties, Inc. (a copy of such deed is attached as Exhibit “B” to the Motion for Summary Judgment). 4. Such official records alsu scow that defendant transferred by special warraniy deed certain real property to Virginia Dieii (a copy of such deed is attached as Exhibit “C” to the Motion for Summary Judgment). Page Lord FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL. SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK, 03/07/2016 01:10:39 PM EFTA00602773

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

CFN 20160083888 BOOK 28155 PAGE 1711 Case No. 50-2010-CA-019300-XXXX-MB 20F 2 5. Defendant defaulted on the note by failing to satisfy the subject note upon the transfer of the Palm Beach County real property referred to above. 6. There is no genuine issue of material fact as to plaintiff's right to enforce the subject note. 7. On or about July 5, 2010, demand for ayment of the balance of the note was made upon defendant by correspondence to his ettorney. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED thet the Plaintiff's Motion for Final Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: a. That Plaintiff recover judgment sgainst Defendant for $550,000.00 plus interest from June 5, 2009 at six percent (6%). b.That Detcccam tbe retaag & this ection. c.The Court retains jurisdiction of this action to enter further orders, including but not limited to crders petaining so 22titterrent and amount of attomeys’ fees and costs. | | case is on the tri¢l calendars for Apri! 4, 2016 and by mis Order, the parties have come to an agreement reyurding the resolution of this matter. DONE aad ORDERED in chambers, in West Palra Beach, Paim Beach County, Florida, this 7th day of March, 2014. ‘ f { v) ‘ais | So;gonereArRagseonooouB—par07/2026, Vans MESA tera! Tedd Ory. A.Car acud: £0-2010-CA-019300-XXXX-MB 03/07/2016 Cheryl.A. Garacuzza Glrouit Judge Copies to: Mark A. Cullen, Attorney for Defendant, The Cullen Law Firm, P.A., 500 5 Australian Ave S-543, West Gain Boach, Mictida 33403-6222. Primary Email: Page 2 of Z EFTA00602774