From: Lesley Groff To: Jefffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Redacted past work product for investors Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:58:24 +0000 Attachments: Redacted_analysis_of effect_of_prospective_court_ruling against_ EPA on_generation_pla nt_values.pdf; Redacted _analysis_of inefficiencies of _natural_gas funding by_capital_markets.pdf; Redacted_analysis_of_proposal_on_geothermal_project.pdf; Redacted_Greek Swiss _law_bond_memo.pdf; Redacted_natural_gas WPP_memo.pdf; Redacted_proposal_for European_corporate_debt_exchange.pdf Begin forwarded message: From: John Dizard < Subject: Fwd: Redacted past work product for investors Date: October 26, 2016 at 5:50:45 PM EDT To: Lesley Groff <a Dear Jeffrey, I have looked for examples of my non-journalistic consulting work that could be sensibly and discreetly redacted, and which showed the difference between the level of detail of my work for private investors and my journalistic efforts. There is a review of a geothermal project I turned down, an overview of how the US natural gas market bubble was inflated, the effect on energy investors of a then-prospective court setback for the EPA, and a discussion of natural gas Volumetric Production Payments. The passage of time should allow some measure of how well my views anticipated future events This is energy weighted, but it should give you some idea of what I was proposing Best and thanks! John EFTA00438021