From: Darren Indyke Subject: Re: Opinion from 11th Circuit attached Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:26:03 +0000 Jackie sent that out. I have no idea whether Jeffrey agreed to it or not. Please find out from him and confirm it with Jackie. If he was not ced then send to him and ask him if it is ok. Thanks. DARREN K. INDYKE DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor New York, New York 10022 Telephone: Telecopier: Mobile: email: SRK ER ERE KHER ERR R EAI EIRENE ISIN IAI IEA ASSIA IASI IASI AAAI AAAI I The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2014 Darren K. Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved. RARER ARR KEKRE EERE RR RE RIR REESE RRR REFERRER ERE ER REFS AR EERE RARER IRR BERRA REFERRER REE On Apr 19, 2014, at 9:08 AM, [RE wrote: Looks like you are all set up for 9am Monday. I see Jeffrey is only [J on the mail. Does this mean he is NOT on the call? Please confirm Jeffrey is not on the call Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Jackie Perczek (- Date: April 18, 2014 37 PM EDT To: "Martin G Ce: Darren Indy >, Roy Black Subject: Re: Opinion from 11th Circuit attached EFTA00370981

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

If everyone calls my office at 9 i. on Monday, we will place you in conference. i -- Jackie On Apr 18, 2014, at 9:55 PM, "Jackie Perczek" (> wrote: 9 am Monday works for Roy. -- Jackie On Apr 18, 2014, at 7:39 PM, "Martin G. Weinberg" <> wrote: 9-10 AM works best so we can move quickly after making decisions From: Darren Indyke Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 7:20 PM To: Martin G. Weinberg Ce: Jeffrey Epstein ; royb BLACK ; Jackie Perczek ; Subject: Re: Opinion from 11th Circuit attached Let's have a call first thing on Monday. Please let [J know what times you have available. Thanks. DARREN K. INDYKE DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor New York, New York 10022 Telephone: Telecopier: PIRI IRR IR HIRI IIIS IIIB IASI IAEA III IIASA SEIS IA NSAI AIBA ASIA ASI ASIA AAAI A IH The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2014 Darren K. Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved. SEHR K IERIE RRR EIR RISES ISSR IIIS ISERIES IASI AISA II SEBE AISI IISA ASSIA SSEBI SSSA SSI SAAN AAI On Apr 18, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Martin G. Weinberg wrote: As we expected, feared from oral argument: 11th Cir granted us jurisdiction, then denied appeal on basis 410 does not establish a privilege and disclosures to Govt waives attorney's work product. Court also lifted stay. We should discuss the en banc option. <11th Circuit Opinion.pdf> EFTA00370982

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EFTA00370983