JONATHAN B. COLE (70460) DAVID A. MYERS (140181) NEMECEK & COLE A Professional Corporation 15260 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 920 She iforni = Tel. / Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT Co eon An HH & YW N _ o SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC Plaintiff, ) Case No. BC502448 )B -vs- } (C.R.C. 3.1800(a)(1)} ) ) ) ) ) IRIEF SUMMARY OF CASE _ _ SUPPORTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT _—_— — we N JEFFREY EPSTEIN, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Se vu NEMECEK & COLE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION a 18260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE $20, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403-5344 - ~ TELEPHONE (818) 788-9500 FACSIMILE (818) 501-0328 PARTIES Plaintiff: Sitrick and Company, a division of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC —_— Oo oe Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein BRIE MMARY CAS me NY —~ & Plaintiff Sitrick and Company (“Plaintiff”) entered into a written contract with defendant N N Jeffrey Epstein (“Defendant”) to provide advice and public relations services (Exhibit A).' These N Ww services were sought by the Defendant in order to counteract negative media and public attention N > regarding alleged improper sexual relations with a minor. Defendant also entered into an oral NY NY N 4 Nn WG ‘All Exhibits referenced herein are attached to the concurrently filed Declaration of Michael S. Sitrick in Support of the Application for Default Judgment (the “Declaration”). N oo -l- 2489003P.05 Summary CRC3.1800.wpd BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE CASE IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT EFTA00313240

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

contract with Plaintiff to provide consulting advice and public relations services to assist Defendant’s attorneys attempting to counteract other negative media attention. This arose from a photograph of Prince Andrew and the Defendant walking in Central Park published in news articles in the United Kingdom and the United States titled, “The Prince and the Pedophile,” “Duchess of York Got Loan From Wealthy US Pedophile,” “Meet Manhattan’s Raunchy New Odd Couple — The Prince and the Pervert.” As set forth in Plaintiff's June 8, 2011 invoice (last invoice behind Exhibit B), Plaintiff owed Defendant a total of $103,517.82 for Defendant's professional services. Defendant has never paid what he owes to Plaintiff. Defendants breached both their written and oral contracts with Plaintiff. As a result, Plaintiff wo won nu & WY N is entitled to Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $103,517.82 plus interest, attorneys fees, - o and cost of suit. Pursuant to the written contract, Plaintiff's is also entitled to pre-judgment interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) through the date of entry of judgment and thereafter until the judgment is — No = satisfied. In addition, because the contract contains a provision for the prevailing party to recover its —_ w attorneys fees, Plaintiff is entitled to recover its attorneys’ fees in pursuing this matter (Exhibit A, —_ wn +> paragraph 9). On March 7, 2013 Plaintiff filed this action in the Los Angeles Superior Court, LASC Case NEMECEK & COLE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION a 15260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE 920, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403-5344 TELEPHONE (816) 788-9500 FACSIMILE (818) 501-0328 No. BC502448, against Defendant for Breach of Contract, Breach of Oral Contract, Common — ~ Counts, Account Stated, Open Book Account and Quantum Meruit. Plaintiff filed a First Amended —_— Oo © Complaint filed on April 8, 2013. After serving Defendant with the Summons and Complaint, and never receiving any response, N o Plaintiff filed a Request for Entry of Default. Default was entered by the Clerk of the Court on July N -_ 12, 2013. Plaintiff now requests the Court enter a default judgment against the Defendant. The total amount of the Judgment should be $151,579.78. This includes: e Compensatory damages of $103,517.82 (the amount of the unpaid invoices for services Plaintiffs rendered for Defendant which have never been paid); Ny N N S FBR Pre-judgment interest of $23.450.01 (the calculation used for determining the total N an e amount of interest is set forth in the Declaration at par. no. 5); Attorney’s fees of $23,797.00; Nn N on oO ~2- 2489003P.05 Summary CRC3.1800.wpd BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE CASE IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT EFTA00313241

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

- e Dated: August oO on DH F&F WY N meee > Ww NY — SC NEMECEK & COLE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 15260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE 920, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403-5344 - ELEPHONE (818) 788-9500 FACSIMILE (818) 01-0328 NoN R&R SREB GPeSEAWAG Nu N o ~ 2489003P.05 Summary CRC3.1800.wpd Costs of $814.95. 28 2013 NEMECEK & COLE dh B. COLE DAVID A. MYERS Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC 3. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE CASE IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT EFTA00313242

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

NEMECEK & COLE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 15260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE 920, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403-5344 TELEPHONE (818) 788-9500 FACSIMILE (818) 501-0328 Co ont Dn nH F&F WW NY 10 11 12 13 1s 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PR RVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and nota party to the within action; my business address is 15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 920, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403. On August 28, 2013, I served the document described as BRIEF SUMMARY OF CASE SUPPORTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT upon the interested parties in this action in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: Jeffrey Epstein 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 ».@ (By Mail) I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Sherman Oaks, Callfornia i in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after day of deposit for mailing contained in affidavit. (By Overnight Delivery) I deposited this document in the box or other facility located at 15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 920, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 regularly maintained by Overnite Express, in an envelope designated by Overnite Express with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the persons on whom it is to be served, for guaranteed next business day elivery. (By Facsimile Transmission) I caused the foregoing document to be served by facsimile —— to each of the interested parties at the facsimile machine telecopy number shown ve. (By Electronic Service (to individual persons)) By electronically transmitting the document(s) listed above to the e-mail address(es) of the person(s) set forth on the attached service list from fkoljan@nemecek-cole.com. To my knowledge, the transmission was reported as complete and without error. See, California Rules a Court, Rule 2060. (By Personal Service) I served such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). Executed on August 28, 2013, at Sherman Oaks, California. X__— (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. inka EFTA00313243

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

NEMECEK & COLE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 15260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE $20, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403-5344 TELEPHONE (818) 788-9600 FACSIMILE (818) 501-0328 _ JONATHAN B. COLE (70460) DAVID A. MYERS (140181) NEMECEK & COLE A Professional Corporation 15260 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 920 She ifornia 914 44 Tel. / Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT Co em NY DAH F&F WwW WH 10 SITRICK AND COMPANY, a division of ) Case No. BC502448 11 | SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC } DECLARATION OF MICHAEL S. 12 Plaintiff, ) SITRICK IN SUPPORT OF ) APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT 13 -vs- ) JUDGMENT ) 14 |] JEFFREY EPSTEIN, an individual; and ) [C.C.P. §585(d); C.R.C. §1800(a)(2)] is DOES | through 20, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) I, Michael S. Sitrick, declare and state as follows: 1. I am the Chairman and CEO of Sitrick and Company (“Plaintiff”) in this action. I submit this declaration in support of the accompanying Application for Default Judgment, etc., against Mr. Jeffrey Epstein (“Defendant”). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, and could and would testify competently thereto if sworn as a witness. 2. Sitrick and Company is a strategic communications company focusing on corporate, — financial, transactional and crisis communications. On or about November 4, 2005, the Defendant entered into a written contract (the “Contract”) with Plaintiff to provide advice and public-relations regarding allegations that Defendant had improper sexual relations with a fourteen-year-old girl whom he hired to perform a massage. The Contract provides that it may be terminated with 30 days written notice by either party. The Contract was never terminated. A true and correct copy of the Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit A. -|- 2489003P.04 Decl CCP 585.wpd DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT EFTA00313244

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

3. On or about March 11, 2011, Defendant also entered into an oral contract with _ Plaintiff (the “Oral Contract”) to provide consulting advice and public relations services to assist with his various attorneys to help counteract negative media attention, This arose from a photograph of Prince Andrew and the Defendant walking in Central Park published in news articles in the United Kingdom and the United States titled: “The Prince and the Pedophile,” “Duchess of York Got Loan From Wealthy US Pedophile,” “Meet Manhattan’s Raunchy New Odd Couple — The Prince and the Pervert.” 4. Plaintiff sent monthly invoices to Defendant showing the amount owed Plaintiff for er -) o, ee en oe <1 Defendant’s services and requesting payment. True and correct copies of the invoices are attached hereto as Exhibit B. The amount of the outstanding balance totals $103,517.82 as shown on the June 8, 2011 invoice contained therein. Defendant has failed to pay Plaintiff for these services. Pursuant to the terms of said Contract and the Oral Contract, and as a result of Defendant’s failure to pay, Plaintiff has been damaged in the sum of $103,517.82, together with interest thereon from the dates —_— vw BY the amounts in each invoice began accruing interest. ai Payment on cach invoice was due within twenty (20) days of receipt of each bill (Exhibit A, paragraph 2). The Contract provides that interest began accruing ten (10) days after payment was due (Exhibit A, paragraph 9). A true and correct copy of the first invoice dated April 7, 2011 in the amount of $71,319.07 is attached behind Exhibit B, Interest on that amount began accruing on May 7, 2011. A true and correct copy of the second invoice dated May 3, 2011 in the amount of $28,171.25 is attached behind Exhibit B. Interest on that amount began accruing on June 2, 2011. A true and correct copy of the third invoice dated June 8, 2011 in the amount of $4,027.50 is attached behind Exhibit B. Interest on that amount between accruing on July 8, 2011. According to the Contract, interest accrues at ten percent per annum (Exhibit A, paragraph 9). As such, accrued interest on the invoices of Exhibit B at 10% based upon when interest on each began to accrue totals $23,450.01 thru August 21, 2013. 6. The Contract also provides that the prevailing party in any action to enforce the Contract shall be entitled to recovery of attorneys’ fees (Exhibit A, paragraph 9), In seeking to enforce the Contract and the Oral Contract, and related proceedings such as prosecution of this matter, —_— n wn TELEPHONE (818) 788-0500 FACSIMILE (818) $01-0228 ~— >» -_ ~s -2- 2489003P.04 Decl CCP 585.wpd DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT EFTA00313245

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Plaintiff has incurred $23,797.00 in attorneys’ fees through August 15, 2013. — 2 tp Plaintiff has also incurred costs. Some of these costs include: court filing fee of 3 || $435.00 on 3/7/13; service fee of $159.95 on 5/10/13; and service fee of $220.00 on 6/6/13. These 4 || costs total $814.95. 5 8. The total of the above sums, including $103,517.82 (amount owed for professional 6 || services), plus $23,450.01 (interest), plus $23,797 in attorneys’ fees, plus $814.95 (costs) equals 7 $151,579.78. 8 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 9 || true and correct. : : 10 Executed thi Fy i 11 32 12 436 rH 8 : 3 13 : 5214 g84is ne ] ze HI 3 z 17 : 18 & — 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3- 2489003P.04 Decl CCP 585.wpd DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT EFTA00313246

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EXHIBIT “A” EFTA00313247

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

i Scott Komspar - RoyBlack.pdf ' _ . . ; -* ” . SITRICK AND COMPANY INC. LOS ANGELES + NEW YORK November 4, 2005 Roy Bleck, Esq. Black, Srebaick, Komspan & Stempf 201 S. Biscayne BIL, #1300 Miami, FL 33131 Dear Ray: This letter, when accopted by you below os behalf of Jeflity Epstein (the “Cilent*) and accepted by Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf (“Attoracy”), will constitute the agreement with respect to the engugemont of Sitrick And Company Inc. « California cocporstios ("Sltrick") 2s corporate communications adviser, specialist and non-designated expert consultant, with respect to any lega) issues Attorney is handling for Clicat on the fallowiag terass 1 ‘The Client and Attorney, effective as of October 21, 2005, have retained Sierick to Enrideten ent pottn etatees ron bs coremgion i hes ome Stirick will waive its customuiry nonrefundable retainer of $60,000 as 2 crinisoum, agnual fec. In lcu thereof, Company shall pay Silrick a non-refundable rotsiocr of $30,000 as a minimum, annual fee. Sitrick’s time charges will be billed against the retainer at the hourty rate runge of $165 to $650 depeading om the porson performing the. services; pacaprofessiounl/axsiatant time ix billed at $55.00 per hout. When the retainer has been applied against lime charges, additional time charges in any yeat will be billed as incurred and arc payeble within tweaty days after rcocipt. Charges are computed on a portal-to-portal basis for emy travel time for meetings held outside of Sinick’s offices. Time is billed by Sitrick in increments of ane-quarter of an hour. In addition, we custousirily fequest a “success feé” if we believe we have performed services for « client which result in significant benefits to the clicnt beyond those we believe a normal public relations firm could achieve. Obviously, we would sit down amd discuss any such proposed foe with you if we believe it Is warranted, as such foo would be subject tn your appreval. Please review.our billy cach month upon reocipt. Lf you bave any questions, please feel Gree to call. However, unless you make some protest to Sitrick in writing within twenty days of rcecipt af the bill, it will be presumed you bare no objections to it and agroc to the reasonableness of che bill. ‘The Client shall reimburse Sitrick within twenty days of Invoice date for say and all out of pocket costs and expenses incurred by Sitrick fn connection with Its engagement — us . BP: Ae | EFTA00313248

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

lack.pdf f STTRICK AND COMPANY INC. LOS ANGELES ~ NOW YORE November 4, 2005 hereunder, including without limitation. travel costs, production costs, tong distance and phatocopy charges, and other out-of-pocket costs and expenses. Reimbursable costs are not opplicd against (he retainer and will bo billed monthly by Sitrick. 4, Siwick acknowledges that its services being provided pursuant to this letter agreement are for the benefit of Client and thut Atornay, as Clicat’s counscl, shall wot be responsible for any (ces, costs or expenses incurred in connection with Sitrick's services. 5. Sitrick And Company's engagement hereunder may be terminated by’either panty en 30 days prior written notice, Alll provisions of this letter releting to the paymeat of fees and by EFTA00313249

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY INC. LOS ANGELES+ NEWYORK November 4, 2005 provision of this letter agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable ‘atiorney fees. Any controversy, claim gr dispute relating to this Jemer agreement shall be resolved by binding arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association pursuant to an arbitration conducted in Los Angeles County, Celifornia. Jodgment upon such arbitration may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. This letter agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in accurdance with the substantive laws of the State of California applicable to contracts made nau to be performed therein. GouneltoCliet ——SOSOS—=~S~S By, Sear & = a Marra /%5 Partner «© bee, See bret, Kavayrn * St onpr, 0A. EFTA00313250

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

~ Page 4 | [Scott Komspan - RoyBlack.pdf \— se tse genes a : = aensads cee NNN EE SITRICK AND COMPANY INC. LOS ANCELES - MEW YOR November 4, 2005 Roy Black, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf 201 S, Blecayne BI, #1300 Miami, FL 33131 Re: Ieffrey Epstein INVOICE Retginer fot the period beginning: October 21, 2005 as entnensenenenesenrecntnnsenteansernenten ns nseee$ 90,000.00 Refundable Expense advance ....——— seme ne rae $5,000.00 TOTAL DUE nn nese case ce treme vennereeeenseentss SIS, 000,00 Please wire treasfec funds to: CITY NATIONAL BANK - CREDIT ACCOUNT OP; SITRICK AND COMPANY ABA ROUTING (CREDIT ACCOUNT NO. ATTN: DAVE NATHAN ar Please make check payshic to: STTRICK AND COMPANY INC. EFTA00313251

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EXHIBIT “B” EFTA00313252

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY A Unit of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC A Subsidiary of Resources Global Professionals April 07, 2011 Invoice submitted to: Jeffrey Epstein via email: leaked CC: Jay Lefkowitz, P.C., Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Ave New York, NY 1022-4611 In Reference To: Jeffrey Epstein Professional services and expenses through: 3/26/2011 Professional fees $70,255.00 Expenses * $1,064.07 ——Amount Current professional fees and expenses $71,319.07 $71,319.07 Balance due *Expenses may reflect charges from a prior period as well as the current period Terms: Due upon presentation Please Remit Payment Wire funds to: Send checks to: SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC City National Bank File 1102 ABA 1801 W. Olympic Blvd Credit A/C Pasadena, CA 91109-1102 Attn.: Dave Nathan Federal Tax Dy 1840 Ci ark East, Suite 800, Los Angeles, C 7 Tel Fax EFTA00313253

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 3/26/2011 MICHAEL S. SITRICK TAMARA TAYLOR THOMAS S. MULLIGAN TONY KNIGHT JEAN S. TRINH LIZA C. NEDELMAN Professional Services SITRICK AND COMPANY Professional Summary Page 2 ——Hours —— Amount 55.75 895.00 $49,896.25 0.50 550.00 $275.00 11.50 595.00 $6,842.50 20.00 595.00 $11,900.00 6.50 185.00 $1,202.50 0.75 185.00 $138.75 Hours __ Amount 3/7/2011 MSS_ Discussions with Jeffrey and Martin; review various materials; discussion with 5.00 Today Show producer, draft and revise statements; strategy development with team and T. Knight. TK Planning and strategy with MSS; internet research on coverage of the Prince 3.25 Andrew stories; directing efforts of J. Trinh on collecting clips, and review of some of the clips; review of prior records from 2007 and report to MSS; review of V. Roberts police records; confer with J. Trinh. TSM Confer with T. Knight about starting early on Tuesday morning to field calls 1.00 from British media; review media and other background to prepare. JST Discussion with T. Knight re: clip searches. 0.25 3/8/2011 MSS_ Various discussions and emails with reporters, Jeffrey, Jay Lefkowitz, follow 6.25 up re: same; confer throughout the day with T. Knight and T. Mulligan. TK — Early morning follow ups with journalists in the U.K. regarding the Prince 3.75 Andrew story and provide the statement; directing efforts of Sitrick executive T. Mulligan in NY office re follows with UK journalists; planning and strategy with MSS; read and respond to emails from MSS regarding news coverage and his communications with client and attorneys; review of second day coverage and locating The Mail inaccurate story about phone logs. TSM _ Review media, incl clip from NBCs Today Show; follow up with media, sending 4.50 statement and fielding interview requests throughout morning from two reporters at Mail on Sunday, two others at Telegraph; confer on same throughout day with T. Knight, MSS. JST Research US and UK clips on Epstein and Prince Andrew; email to T. Knight. 1.50 3/9/2011 MSS._ Review and respond to email throughout the day, phone conferences, workon 7.00 strategy, discussions with Jeffrey, lawyers; review various materials; discussion with defamation attorneys, PR affiliate in London; follow up re: same. 1840 C Tel t, Suite 800, Los Fax 1067 EFTA00313254

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 3/26/2011 Page 3 Hours ____ Amount 3/9/2011 TK Read and respond to emails from client and attorneys; planning with MSS and = 2.00 comments to him on various versions of the statement; continued review of coverage; confer with T. Mulligan. TSM_ Review Mail story; confer with T. Knight, MSS re: next steps; take interview 1.50 request from J. Swaine, Telegraph, and forward to T. Knight and MSS. 3/10/2011 MSS_ Review and respond to emails; phone discussions throughout the'day andinto 7.25 the night from media, Jeffrey, lawyers, defamation lawyers in US and UK; strategy development. TK Review of coverage; planning with T. Mulligan and discussion of The Daily 2.76 Mail coverage and recent request for answers; briefing MSS and forwarding Daily Mail message to client and attorneys; phone call with A. Wolfe of Newsweek, fact checking, draft fact check questions for MSS and client. TSM Review media; field interview request from London Times repoprter K. 3.50 Mansey; take call from and exchange follow up email with S. Churcher, investigative reporter for Mail on Sunday, regarding supposed FBI investigation surrounding prominent friends of J. Epstein; discuss request with T. Knight, MSS. JST Research clips on Epstein and Prince Andrew for T. Knight. 1.00 3/11/2011 MSS Review and respond to various emails; draft script for video; strategy 4.75 discussions with T. Taylor and T. Knight. TK Review of coverage and report to MSS; responding to U.K. media calls; review 1.75 strategy memos from MSS. TSM Review media; compile media contacts to date and exchange with T. Knight. 0.50 TT Discuss media strategy, possible video with MSS. 0.50 JST Review coverage on Epstein for bylines; research US and UK media contacts 2.25 for T. Knight; research News of the World story. LCN Assisted J. Trinh on compiling media list per T. Knight 0.75 3/12/2011 MSS Various discussions with Paul Tweed, Jeffrey Epstein; work on strategy; 4.75 review documents and news clips; follow up re: same; review and respond to email. 3/13/2011 MSS_ Review and respond to email re: Daily Mail, strategy and Fergie; work on letter 4.75 to Telegraph; email to Paul Tweed, Jeffrey; follow up re: same. 1840 C Suite 800, Los 1067 Tel Fax EFTA00313255

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 3/26/2011 Page 4 Hours ____Amaount 3/14/2011 MSS _ Review and respond to email re: Telegraph, Sunday Mail; discussion with 6.75 Mark Bolland in UK; email to and from Paul on letter; review various clips, email to and from Jeffrey; work on media strategy with T. Knight. TK Review of coverage and forwarding key clips to MSS; planning media strategy 1.75 with MSS. JST Research UK and US media contacts for T. Knight. 0.50 3/15/2011 MSS_ Discussions and email with Mark Bolland; draft letter to Mail; review and 6.00 respond various emails with Jeffrey; calls to Marty Weinberg and Jay Lefkowitz; work on statement for Fergie; review various materials, work on ongoing strategy, review op-eds and other approaches; strategy discussion T. Knight. TK — Review of media coverage and forward key clips to MSS; strategy meeting 2.50 with MSS; drafting strategy memo proposal and send to MSS. 3/16/2011 MSS_ Review and respond to emails including from Paul Tweed. 0.50 3/17/2011 MSS_ Review and respond to email from Paul Tweed, revise suggested statement 1.50 for Fergie; review materials. TK Review coverage; phone conversation with Kate Mansey of Sunday Times; 1.50 review of recent Mansey stories; report to MSS. JST Research Kate Mansey clips in the Times for T. Knight; research media 0.50 contacts for list. 3/18/2011 TSM Figid call from A. Witheridge, Mail on Sunday, re: J. Epstein colleagues] 0.50 S. Cowles. 3/23/2011 TK — Review on going coverage in Miami Business Review and UK print and report 0.75 to MSS. JST Research most recent clips on Prince Andrew and Epstein; email to T. Knight. 0.50 3/24/2011 MSS_ Respond to email from Jeffrey, draft note on media strategy, calls to Jeffrey 1.25 and Paul Tweed. Total time charges 95.00 $70,255.00 1840 Cen Park East, Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA 90067 a aT EFTA00313256

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 3/26/2011 Page 5 Summary of out-of-pocket expenses Amount ON-LINE RESEARCH 873.00 TELEPHONE 191.07 Total out-of-pocket expenses $1,064.07 1840 C t, Suite 800, Los na Tel Fax EFTA00313257

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY A Unit of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC A Subsidiary of Resources Gtobal Professionals May 03, 2011 Invoice submitted to: Jeffrey Epstein CC: Jay Lefkowitz, P.C., Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Ave New York, NY 1022-4611 In Reference To: Jeffrey Epstein Professional services and expenses through: 4/23/2011 Professional fees $23,171.25 Expenses * $5,000.00 ———Amount Current professional fees and expenses $28,171.25 Previous balance $71,319.07 $99,490.32 Balance due *Expenses may reflect charges from a prior period as well as the current period Terms: Due upon presentation Please Remit Payment Wire funds to: Send checks to: SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC City National Bank File 1102 a. ™ 1801 W. Olympic Blvd Credit A/ Pasadena, CA Attn.: Dave Nathan 91109-1102 Federal Tax ml 1840 Century Park East, Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA 90067 nn Fax EFTA00313258

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 4/23/2011 Page 2 Professional Summary Name girs ___Raate ___Amount MICHAEL S. SITRICK 13.75 895.00 $12,306.25 TONY KNIGHT 8.25 595.00 $4,908.75 BRIAN D. GLICKLICH 2.00 550.00 $1,100.00 AARON CURTISS 925 525.00 $4,856.25 Professional Services Hours ____ Amount 3/28/2011 MSS_ Review, respond and send various emails. 0.75 TK — Email to attorneys requesting information, read and respond to emails from 0.50 MSS; respond to client emails. 3/31/2011 MSS_ Review and respond to emails re: op-eds; review materials/back up 0.75 documents for op-ed. TK Briefing A. Curtiss on op-ed project, marshaling backup documents for 1.00 A.Curtiss; emails with MSS. 4/1/2011 TK Further discussion of strategic approach to op-ed with A. Curtiss; review first 0.50 draft of op-ed. AC _ Research media coverage and court history of case; draft and edit op-ed 7.00 response; confer with T. Knight r-e same. 4/3/2011 MSS _ Discussion with Roy Black. 0.50 4/412011 MSS Review Newsweek/Daily Beast article, discussions with reporter, call to editor, 3.75 draft note for Roy Black to review, discussion with T. Knight. TK — Multiple phone calls and emails with MSS regarding correction of story posted = 2.25 to The Daily Beast; review of story, draft correction request; phone calls to reporter A. Wolfe, emails with R. Black and J. Perzcek at Black's office. AC Review and assess DailyBeast article; confer with T. Knight re: changes to 1.00 op-ed. 4/5/2011 MSS_ Review materials; review and comment on op-ed; email to Paul Tweed. 2.00 TK Op-ed strategy with A. Curtiss. 0.25 AC Confer with T. Knight re: facts of case and status of op-ed. 0.25 1840 C t, Suite 800, Los na Tel Fax EFTA00313259

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 4/6/2011 MSS TK BDG AC 4/7/2011 MSS TK AC 4/19/2011 MSS 4/23/2011 Review various materials; review and edit op-ed; work on digital strategy; review and edit memo on same; discussion with Roy Black. Planning and strategy with MSS; conference call with MSS and R. Black; review of older Epstein case news clips and revisions to op-ed and further edits to it after MSS edits; review of strategic digital media proposal. Call and email with MSS, draft best practices memo. Confer with T. Knight re: op-ed; review edits and changes to same. Strategy discussions with T. Knight re: op-ed placement. Planning and strategy with MSS; discussion of op-ed placement; further review of old files for more on Ashley D.; review email from R. Black. Confer with T. Knight re: op-ed and plea documents. Email from Roy Black and his partners re: media inquiry; call reporter at Roy's request (DBR), participate in interview with reporter and Roy, review and respond to email re: same. Total time charges Summary of out-of-pocket expenses OTHER Total out-of-pocket expenses 1840 Century Park East, Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA 90067 a a 2.00 0.75 0.25 1.25 0.25 1.00 33.25 $23,171.25 5,000.00 $5,000.00 EFTA00313260

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY A Unit of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC A Subsidiary of Resources Global Professionals June 08, 2011 Invoice submitted to: Jeffrey Epstein | CC: Jay Lefkowitz, P.C., Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Ave New York, NY 1022-4611 In Reference To: Jeffrey Epstein Professional services and expenses through: 5/28/2011 Professional fees $4,027.50 Expenses * $0.00 _—_—Amount $99,490.32 Previous balance Balance due $103,517.82 *Expenses may reflect charges from a prior period as well as the current period Terms: Due upon presentation Please Remit Payment Wire funds to: Send checks to: SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC City Nati B File 1102 ABA# 1801 W. Olympic Blvd Credit A/ Pasadena, CA 91109-1102 Attn.: Dave Nathan Federal Tax | 1840 ark East, Suite 800, Los PT Tel Fax EFTA00313261

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: §/28/2011 Page 2 Professional Summary Name ——Hours ___Rate ____Amount MICHAEL S. SITRICK 4.50 895.00 $4,027.50 Professional! Services Hours ____Amount 4/29/2011 MSS_ Review and respond to email, meeting with Paul Tweed, work on letterfromO 2.50 of Y. 4/30/2011 MSS__ Review and respond to email from Jeffrey, Paul; work on letter from D-O-Y; 2.00 follow up re: same. Total time charges 4.50 1840 t, Suite 800, Los ni Tel Fax $4,027.50 EFTA00313262

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

NEMECEK & COLE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 15260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE 920, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403-5344 TELEPHONE (818) 788-9500 FACSIMILE (818) 501-0328 uo eo NI DH F&F WY HB — o 11 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and ia a party to a within action; my business address is 15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 920, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403. . On August 28, 2013, I served the document described as DECLARATION OF MICHAEL S. SITRICK IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT upon the interested parties in this action in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: Jeffrey Epstein 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, FL 33480 ».@ (By Mail) | am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Sherman Oaks, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after day of deposit for mailing contained in affidavit. (By Overnight Delivery) I deposited this document in the box or other facility located at 15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 920, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 regularly maintained by Overnite Express, in an envelope designated by Overnite Express with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the persons on whom it is to be served, for guaranteed next business day elivery. (By Facsimile Transmission) I caused the foregoing document to be served by facsimile oenieeion to each of the interested parties at ee facsimile machine telecopy number shown above. (By Electronic Service (to individual persons)) By electronically transmitting the document(s) listed above to the e-mail address(es) of the person(s) set forth on the attached service list from fkoljan@nemecek-cole.com. To my knowledge, the transmission was reported as complete and without error. See, California Rules of Court, Rule 2060. (By Personal Service) I served such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). Executed on August 28, 2013, at Sherman Oaks, California. 20 |X_ ~— (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 above is true and correct. (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. _ es EFTA00313263