From To: "Jay Lefkowitz" Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does ff United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:25:56 +0000 Importance: Normal She has an amazing voice -- I saw her in Sweeney Todd. There are so many great shows playing right now. I hope that the economy doesn’t destroy Broadway. Have a good time. If you are going to file anything in the Doe v. United States case, just give me a heads up. Thanks. From: Jay Lefkowitz (rit Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does § United States Have heard it's fantastic. We're actually taking all the kids tonight to see Gypsy with Patti Lupone. From: Sent: 10/16/2008 05:13 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does v. United States And probably something much stronger than coffee. I was in New York last weekend and saw “In the Heights.” Have you seen it? It was absolutely fantastic. It may be slightly too racy for your daughter, but it was amazing. EFTA00216098

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Sent; Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:11 PM Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does v. United States Ok. But we'll need a whole meal. From: Sent: 10/16/2008 05:08 PM AS To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does ff United States When (if) this is ever all over, I will buy you a cup of coffee and we can swap stories. From:Jay Lefkowitz mi (iii Sent: Thu October 16, 2 LP Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does v. United States Thanks | to the club. I often wish plaintiffs would sue someone else instead of my client. :) From: Sent: ha 16/ 2008 04:23 disse Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does If United States Dear Roy and Jay: I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards’ October 15" letter before he filed it in connection with his Reply, so I do not know whether Mr. Lee has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards’ motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues, instead, in his lawsuit against the United States. <<DE30_081016_Reply re Motn Unseal.pdf>> <<DE30-2_081016_Ex 1.pdf>> <<DE30-3_081016_Ex 2.pdf>> EFTA00216099

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EFTA00216100