From: "Jay Lefkowitz" To: Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does ff United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:11:24 +0000 Importance: Normal Ok. But we'll need a whole meal. From: Sent: 10/16/2008 To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does ff United States When (if) this is ever all over, I will buy you a cup of coffee and we can swap stories. ay Lefkowitz [mailto Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:01 PM (USAFLS); Roy Black Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does Jf United States Thanks welcome to the club. | often wish plaintiffs would sue someone else instead of my client. :) From: Sent: 10/16/2008 04:23 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz; "Roy BLACK" Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does If United States Dear Roy and Jay: I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards’ October 15" letter before he filed it in connection with his Reply, so I do not know whether Mr. Lee has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards’ motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed EFTA00215970

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues, instead, in his lawsuit against the United States. <<DE30_081016 Reply re Motn Unseal.pdf>> <<DE30-2_081016_Ex 1.pdf>> <<DE30-3_081016_Ex 2.pdf>> TTT CCT. T EFTA00215971