From: "Jay Lefkowitz" To: Ce: Subject: Re: Follow-up point Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:39:17 +0000 Importance: Normal | | In reviewing your December proposal, there are a couple of things | don't understand. What limits are placed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense." In other words, what individuals would have this right? And would these individual only have this right if they proceeded exclusively under 2255? Also, to what enumerated offenses do you think would Mr. Epstein have to make constructive admissions of conviction? and how many such offenses? And against whom? Remember that while you may have investigated various offenses, he only plead guilty to certain state crimes. Finally, would paragraphs 8-10 of the September Agreement still be operative? | am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and | am open to understanding it that way. But | would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay pe : eg 08/14/2008 12:44 PM Subject Follow-up point Hi Jay —I forgot to mention that I can no longer argue that the Court shouldn’t force us to produce the agreement because we have already provided the victims with the relevant portion when | now understand from you that I have NOT provided them with the relevant portion. EFTA00215501

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to postmaster@kirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. eee eee eee ee eee eee eee eee eee EFTA00215502