From: To: Subject: Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:06:16 +0000 Importance: Normal etter to Jay Hi I found one mistake in the letter, which I corrected in your copy below (I referred to the private investigators as detectives in one of the sentences). Also, another girl was approached by private investigators on Sunday. This was a girl who was not identified in the state investigation, but only through the federal investigation. One thing I am concerned about is that, if we indict now, cross-examination will consist of — “and the government told you that if Mr. Epstein is convicted, you are entitled to a large amount of damages, right?” Thank you, I am looking forward to their response. Let me know how things go with Judge Davis, too. From Sent; 03 AM To: Subject: RE: Letter to Jay Here is the version | am faxing Jay this morning. It’s nearly identical to your proposed draft. << File: 071105 J Ltr to Lefkowitz.wpd >> From: ee Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 6:38 PM To: Subject: Letter to Jay Hi [J — Here is my proposed letter. I have put Monday’s date on it. It is pretty firm, but I think we have to send a clear message that the Office will not tolerate even the slightest variation from the agreement. I also have enclosed the most recent version of the indictment — it is just so pretty, it deserves to see the light of day. << File: 071105 J Ltr to Lefkowitz.wpd >> sed indictment.wpd >> EFTA00214876

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EFTA00214877