From: ‘Dv saris)" </o=UsA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=,a To: "i USAFS) i PE (USArLs)" <r (054515) ee Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:52:26 +0000 Importance: Normal Apparently gpl ready worked with | og get all of his emails and electronic documents. I just need to get a copy of that disc to do the review. ‘an you send the relevant request to ISS fe and >mails? This happened less than 7 years ago. Can you send the relevant request to ISS fo: nd mails? This happened less than 7 y ¢ Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: (ME (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:35 PM emengrere i temere OH Uae) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 20 Current employees identify and preserve (those are the forms you completed a couple of months ago). Departed users still in the retain period (3 years) will be done by ISS. AUSA’s preservation is 7 years if I’m not mistaken. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:26 PM To: SSNS (USAFLS); NN (USAFLS); ss) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hol -FLS-0004 Hi Does that apply TTT ernait, too? Or only attorneys who are no longer employed here? And am I correct that J and EG emails are no longer accessible, even at EOUSA? EFTA00212356

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: WaReSeR (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:25 PM To: iE (USAFS); a (USA); a (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Understood however, search for emails is done at the EOQUSA level. The District has no access to mailboxes, mailboxes not longer reside in local servers. From (USAFLS) Se all 23, 2011 1:20 PM To: (USAFLS); EEE (USAFLS); ess) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010- | am not aware that OPR has started any process regarding a search of e-mails of the previous U.S. Attorneys in Miami. OPR received an allegation of misconduct, and they asked for e-mails pertaining to the Epstein case, presumably so they could determine whether to open a full investigation. Since OPR was seeking preliminary information, they asked me to obtain certain e-mails regarding certain topics. From: i (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:16 PM To: USAFLS); (USAFLS); I USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Hi | has had all contact with OPR, so I do not know. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: SE USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:06 PM To: Sttemerted USAFLS); EE (USAFLS); I USAFLS) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein -- OPR Request / Lit. Hold # 2010-FLS-0004 Please note that per i EOUSA Preservation Officer, EOUSA will be the one doing the search for the emails. This is done by the EOUSA’s Information Systems Security Staff. OPR should contact them directly with the desired search strings. Do you know if your OPR POC has started the process ? EFTA00212357

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From I USAEO) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:21 PM To: UALS) Ce: (USAFLS) ; I (USAFLS) Subject: RE: 2010-FLS-0004 Definitely it goes through staff. Anytime OPR is involved in the reviewing something, it goes tol staff first. | sent him an email and am waiting on a response—! will verify this, but I’m 98% certain. It shouldn’t have had to be at your request—OPR should have known to contact fi I'll let you know as soon as | know. Thanks for all of your help! From: I (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:18 PM To: (USAEO) Ce: USAFLS); [NN USAFLS) Subject: RE: 2010-FLS-0004 | don’t believe roup has been involved on this. At least not per our request. Yes BM and ere USAs during the 2005-present period. Another question, if OPR needs to review current AUSAs mailboxes is the search also done byjeroup or do we put the emails on a PST for them to review. From ( (USAEO) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:10 PM To: ii (USAFLS) Ce (USAFLS); ((Usaris) Subject: RE: 2010-FLS-0004 \f i) SRE cparted prior to USAMail implementation in FLS, we won’t have theirs. | can talk to our tech folks to see if it’s even worth doing additional searching, but | believe the answer is that it’s simply not available because of the way our systems were set up prior to USAMail. Be (CM were USAs during the 2005-present applicable period, right? | think that for the OPR question | need to double check with EB. | believe what happens is that [J provides access to their account data to someone on Hse and they run the relevant searches and provide the search results. Do you know whether anyone fromjstaff is aware of the OPR interest in this hold? Thanks, EFTA00212358

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:33 PM To: USAEO); SE USAEO) Cc: (USAFLS); (I (USAFLS) Subject: Ref: 2010-FLS-0004 = Need help again ©. Lit Hold 2010-FLS-0004 | don’t have Attachment 1 or 5 for oon o: FE a!! no longer with us. ES and (served as USA and their email should be at I. How do we go about finding out if archived email for Sand HB exist in our system. How about getting and HE emails for review, | understand OPR is asking. We do have copies of their N drives. HR departure was previous to USAMail. Any help with this will be greatly appreciated. EFTA00212359