For: " > Subject: RE: Jane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:02:50 +0000 Importance: Normal | sent an e-mail to Jason on April 7, asking him to confirm that no sworn statements were taken from any of the six persons listed in the subpoena, prior to sending a letter to plaintiffs’ counsel. | received no response for the next two days. On April 12, | received an e-mail from|, £8! paralegal, asking me the status of the matter. When | told her what | had done previously, she contacted Jason and he sent me a confirmation e-mail that no sworn statements were taken. | am preparing a letter to plaintiffs’ counsel advising them of that fact. Assuming that 302’s were prepared, what is your view on whether they can be released to plaintiffs in the civil case? Could that jeopardize any on-going investigation? From: Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:53 AM To (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf Hi JJ — This just came via CM/ECF. Has anyone told the plaintiffs that we don’t have anything responsive to their subpoena? << File: Jane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf >> EFTA00212040