From: To: ' Subject: RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:41:30 +0000 Importance: Normal A Our office has approved the immunity request so it is now up with Washington. Don't know how long they will take to review it. | also am still waiting to hear from Marina's lawyer about whether he will agree to meet or if we have to wait for the grand jury. -Original Message- From: i (FB) Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 1: To: EE (USAFLS) - Subject: Re: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Sounds fishy to us. Not sure what the benefit could be. Anything from your office on the immunity letter and NY trip [EEE oo Original Message ----- From: aS (USAF Ss Sent: Wed Jun T8 13:53:07 200% Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black HBB and | spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that [had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter frorpat said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think{wrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. Hex plained that IMJ had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled byfiend me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could “make this go away,” we said that our position is that if Epstein stops the process in Washington and pleads in accordance with the terms of the signed agreement, then we will perform pursuant to the agreement. [J explained that if Epstein pleads to something else or gets sentenced to a lower amount, then we will consider that a breach of our agreement and we will proceed accordingly. On that note, has there been any word from Washington? Thank you. EFTA00211941

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EFTA00211942