From: "i (UsArLS) To: a (UsAFLs)' Subject: RE: Your response Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:01:49 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Response_to Remedies - MFK_ -_ 1-24-2012 _639p.docx | don’t think | would do that. Here’s what J wrote. J undertook to review and edit the section Tuesday night. He just gave me some (3 or 4) minor cosmetic edits. | have never really read it through fully, but | had planned to change the intro to say it is a brief, non-comprehensive treatment of issues the court need not reach. In any event, | have to get on a conference call. Let me know what you think. From: ES. (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:47 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Your response I think I would have to see the rest of the other response first. | might then cut and paste one small portion of it into this response. Assistant U From: (UALS) Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:46 AM To: A! (USAF) Subject: RE: Your response If you have any thoughts, suggestions, additions, etc., |am open to them. From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:38 AM To: A (054) Subject: Your response Hi J -— Sorry, | just realized that I forgot to respond about your email from last night. I think it looks fine. I am not crazy about the fact that we don’t cite any law, but they don’t cite anything either. EFTA00205493

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Thank you so much for your help on that case! Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA00205494