From: Paul Cassell <cassellp@law.utah.edu> Brad Edwards <brad(@ pathtojustice.com=> Subject: RE: government position? Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:43:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Sorry to rush you, but following up on our email from a couple of days ago, Brad and | are hoping to file tomorrow (1) Our motion for order directing government to file redacted, unsealed pleadings in the public court file (all three of your sealed pleadings); and (2) A motion for the court to deny the motion to dismiss without requiring additional pleadings from us or, at a minimum, ti grant leave to file a sur-reply (we propose that our brief be of the same length as yours and due 4 weeks after the court rules on our motion (1) above). | know there may be a “clearance” process there on this case, but hoping you can give us a position by, say, noon Friday? Thanks in advance for your help. Paul Cassell Co-counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell DENTIAL f J f Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 5:14 PM To: Paul Cassell; Brad Edwards mGeuseneseeniineniontiekeeeees Subject: Reply re Motion to Dismiss Hi Paul and Brad — I apologize, I didn’t get Ed’s email because I have been in trial prep. Here is the reply without the attachments. Brad should have received the a documents today in the mail. The attachments are the complaints and amended complaints from the state court litigation. I have encrypted the file because of the 6(e) material. I will send the password to Brad separately. Paul — if you want to give me a number where | can send you a text, I can text to you or leave you a voicemail with the EFTA00205136

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

password. EFTA00205137