(USAFLS)" < > Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe ff Enited States Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:11:50 +0000 Importance: Normal | will come on up. From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:05 AM To: os (USAFLS); EI (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe lk Enited States Sounds fine. ES 6s, From: SE (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:00 AM To: a (USAFLS); SE (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I Enited States Shall we confer briefly at 1:30 to make sure we’re on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: (N. (USAFLS) Se hursday, December 01, 2011 10:17 AM To: USAFLS); [EE (USAFLS) Ce: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe l Enited States Yes, I think we need to call him. Do you want to try for 1:30 since we have the time already set aside? Assistant U.S. Attorney Fox From: SEN (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:15 AM To: . (USAFLS); [ (USAFLS) EFTA00204925

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Cc: ES (UsAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe l Enited States | just received a call from | assistant. QJ is canceling today’s conference call; he is feeling a little under the weather and is not coming into the office today. She told me that he will call me tomorrow to reschedule. Sorry. Given that it is unlikely that we are going to have a substantive discussion with J this week, do you think we should reach out and call Cassell back before the week is over? | admit that thought is also making me feel a little bit under the weather. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:35 PM Ce: (USAFLS); (SAS) (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe §f Enited States i: We're on for 1:30 tomorrow. I'll set things up for a conference call at that time and send out the call-in information. Thanks, From: as (USAFLS) uesday, November 29, 2011 6:11 PM ce: . (USAFLS); I (USAFLS); I (USArLs) Subject: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe ff Enited States Hi, | hope you had a great Thanksgiving. As we had previously discussed, | am contacting you to see if we can set up a telephone conference to address some of the outstanding matters that we need to discuss to complete the transfer of the criminal case to your district and meet our obligations under USAP 3-2.170.001. (I also left a message with your assistant earlier today.) Those matters include: the nature and scope of any charges/investigation that may potentially remain viable in the SDFL following the entry of the Non-Prosecution Agreement; the need to advise the FBI in connection with the agents’ pending requests for grand jury subpoenas and their expressed intent to continue investigating allegations against Epstein, advice which in all likelihood will require informing the FBI agents about other USAOs that might be able to assist them in light of the grand jury evidence previously obtained; and the handling of the criminal case file. We (, who was previously assigned to the criminal investigation; I, who is handling the CVRA litigation; and me) can make ourselves available to confer with you after 10:30 tomorrow morning, tomorrow afternoon, or Thursday morning. If those blocks of time do not work, please let us know and we can make other arrangements to accommodate your schedule. Thanks, EFTA00204926

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

United States Attorney's Office a a a E-mail: EFTA00204927