Fc YY (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) < Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:48 AM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); NN (USAFLS); IE (usarcs); (USAFLS); RE (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Attachments: 080822 Lefkowitz Itr to Good morning, everyone. I have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn’t really require a comment, but I wanted to get — feedback regarding the notification to the victims of their right to see the agreement. Here is the language from my proposed victim notification letter: “In addition, a judge has ordered that the United States make available to any designated victim (and/or her attorney) a copy of the actual agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victim (and/or her attorney) reviews, signs, and agrees to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms. would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature.” Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether | | agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the entire agreement available to Mr. Josefsberg and he conveys that information to all of his clients, the concern becomes moot, I suppose. Lastly, from my discussion with i. it appears that the Office does not want to add to the list the names of victims identified after the date of signing the September agreement unless our investigation had provided enough information that we were prepared to include them in the indictment — i. the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add a to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. <<080822 Lefkowitz itr to [> Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone rox 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015173 385 EFTA00189056

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Fc el (USAFLS) From: ES 9s) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:25 AM To: | (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); [I (USAFLS); I (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order =z. During our telephonic hearing, | received the clear impression that Judge Marra wanted the other victims (non-parties to the Jane Doe litigation), would be given the opportunity to see the Agreement, subject to each one agreeing to be bound by the protective order. | believe it would be contrary to Judge Marra’s intent for us to go through the trouble of creating a mechanism for the other non-party victims to have access to the Agreement, and then not tell them there is an Agreement. Also, does CVRA impose any obligation on us, independent of what Judge Marra ordered, to advise the victims of the Agreement? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, August 25, To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); 2008 9: ll sors) EE uses) a srs), (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. [have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn’t really require a comment, but I wanted to get — feedback regarding the notification to the victims of their right to see the agreement. Here is the language from my proposed victim notification letter: “In addition, a judge has ordered that the United States make available to any designated victim (and/or her attorney) a copy of the actual agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victim (and/or her attorney) reviews, signs, and agrees to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms. — would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and | will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature.” Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the entire agreement available to Mr. Josefsberg and he conveys that information to all of his clients, the concern becomes moot, I suppose. Lastly, from my discussion with wi. it appears that the Office does not want to add to the list the names of victims identified after the date of signing the Sepismber agreement unless our investigation had provided 4, 5174 386 EFTA00189057

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

enough information that we were prepared to include them in the indictment i. the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add a to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. << File: 080822 Lefkowitz Itr to [>> Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone a 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-O015175 387 EFTA00189058

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND APMUATED PARTNERSEIDS New York. New York 10027-4617 To Call Writer Directly Facranwie wow kirkiand com August 22, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE. hi linited States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. Florida 3340) Re: Jeffrey Epstein Deur a. I write this lever to correct certain misstatements made in your lever dated August 21, 2008. and the accompanying draft notification, First, you state that "Mr. Josefsberg expended time, effort and funds in preparing to serve as attorney representative in October of 2007 Neither Lo nor any other attormey on Mr Epstein’s defense eam. was notified of this work by Mr, Josefsberg. Second. in the victim notification letter, no judge “has ordered that the United States” make available a copy of the Non-Prosecution. Agreement. Section d of the Order to Compel Production and Protective Order provides that if any of the alleged “victims” and/or their allorneys “request the Opportunity to review the Agreemem.” the USAO shall comply with the request so long as those individuals agree not to disclose the Non-Prosecution Agreement, ‘There is no court order reyuiring the government to provide the alleged “victims” with notice that the Non-Prosecutian Agreement is available to them upon request and doing so is in conflict with the conlidentiality provisions of the Agreeinent. Given that the individuals on the list will have an attorney representative who is fully aware of the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. this conflichiag paragraph of your nolice is unnecessary in any event and should be excised Third. misstatements in your prior notification were not made “with the approval of Mr. Epstein’ counsel Fourth, we are concerned with your open-ended description of Mr. Epsicin’s respunsibililics regarding civil restitudon, The resvlution of liability pursuant to 18 U.S.C 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015176 EFTA00189059

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Auwust 22. 2008 Pave 2 § 2255 is as stated in paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Agreement and the Addendum to the Agreement, no more, uo Jess, Filth. while vou state, in your letter, that the USAO does not intend to delete any of the names on the list provided to Mr. Epstein’s counsel, you do not confirm that the prior list is final and complete. There can be no expansion of the list of individuals that you informed us had been memorialized as of September 24, 2007 and disclosed to Mr. Epstein on June 30, 2008 (the date of sentence pursuant to the Agreement’s disclosure requirements}. Please confirm the exact mune and number of individuals the government plans on notifying as provided for under the Agreement, Sixth, based on express Language in prior communications fronr vour Office, we are in agreement that paragraphs 7 and & of the Agreement are in need of clarification and implementation, We will work with the attorney representative in auempting to reach a fair resolution of the outstanding civil matters in a manner thal is in accordance with the Agreement. Seventh, we have previously communicated our objections to the propriety of the allomey fepresentalive engaging in contested litigation. We again dispute the assertion that Mr. Joselsberg’s duties include Liling contested litigation. In any case, that issue is not ripe tor resolution al this point, bur again, given his agreement to be the allomey representative. we will address these matters directly with Mr, Josefsherg. clhowily ee: || a. Chie! Nonhern Division 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015177 EFTA00189060

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Fax Transmittal Please notify us immediately if any pages are not recelved THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL, MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, MAY CONSTITUTE INSIDE INFORMATION, AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. UNAUTHORIZED USE. DISCLOSURE OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE ‘— US — AT: To: Company: Fax #: Direct #: FY United States Attorney's Office PY fF Company: Fax #: Direct #: Po United States Attorney's Office FY From: Date: Pages wicover- Fax #: Direct #: Jay 2. Lelkowitz August 22, 2008 3 PY | Message: ~ 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015178 EFTA00189061

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

FY (USAFLS) From: Rn os Ei - Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 1:54 PM To: EE saris Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order | Thank you for your response. Did you ever send the agreement to Brad? Do you want me to do that? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone a rox From: I (USAFLS) —_ Sent: Monday, Ai 2008 10:25 AM co eel (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); INN (USAFLS); I cusarcs); Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order During our telephonic hearing, | received the clear impression that Judge Marra wanted the other victims (non-parties to the Jane Doe litigation), would be given the opportunity to see the Agreement, subject to each one agreeing to be bound by the protective order. | believe it would be contrary to Judge Marra’s intent for us to go through the trouble of creating a mechanism for the other non-party victims to have access to the Agreement, and then not tell them there is an Agreement. Also, does CVRA impose any obligation on us, independent of what Judge Marra ordered, to advise the victims of the Agreement? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:48 AM (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015179 388 EFTA00189062

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

| have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn’t really require a comment, but I wanted to get feedback regarding the notification to the victims of their right to see the agreement. Here ts the language from my proposed victim notification letter: “In addition, a judge has ordered that the United States make available to any designated victim (and/or her attorney) a copy of the actual agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victim (and/or her attorney) reviews, signs, and agrees to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms. — would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature.” Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether || agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the entire agreement available to Mr. Josefsberg and he conveys that information to all of his clients, the concern becomes moot, I suppose. Lastly, from my discussion with i. it appears that the Office does not want to add to the list the names of victims identified after the date of signing the September agreement unless our jpvestigation had provided enough information that we were prepar include them in the indictment — f., the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. << File: 080822 Lefkowitz ltr to a Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone a’ rox 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015180 389 EFTA00189063

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

ee. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 2:18 PM re EEE ssi Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order | have not sent Brad the Agreement, and would appreciate it if you could take care of that. Are we sending out parts | and Il, and leaving out the December 2007 letter? Thanks. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 1:54 PM To: a (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Hi - Thank you for your response. Did you ever send the agreement to Brad? Do you want me to do that? Assistant U.S, Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: SD (saris) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:25 AM (i (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); [REE (usar s); I (usarcs); I Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order During our telephonic hearing, | received the clear impression that Judge Marra wanted the other victims (non-parties to the Jane Doe litigation), would be given the opportunity to see the Agreement, subject to each one agreeing to be bound by the protective order. | believe it would be contrary to Judge Marra’s intent for us to go through the trouble of creating a mechanism for the other non-party victims to have access to the Agreement, and then not tell them there is an Agreement. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015181 390 EFTA00189064

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Also, does CVRA impose any obligation on us, independent of what Judge Marra ordered, to advise the victims of the Agreement? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, August 25, :48 AM To: Acosta, Ax (USMS) lll SA) I sa; I us); (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. I have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn’t really require a comment, but I wanted to get a feedback regarding the notification to the victims of their right to see the agreement. Here is the language from my proposed victim notification letter: “In addition, a judge has ordered that the United States make available to any designated victim (and/or her attorney) a copy of the actual agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victim (and/or her attorney) reviews, signs, and agrees to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms. would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature.” Lefkowitz objects, but | am wondering whether || agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the entire agreement available to Mr. Joscfsberg and he conveys that information to all of his clients, the concern becomes moot, I suppose. Lastly, from my discussion with , it appears that the Office does not want to add to the list the names of victims identified after the date of signing the September agreement unless a oe had provided enough information that we were ared to include them in the indictment ., the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. << File: 080822 Lefkowitz ltr to [I >> Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015182 391 EFTA00189065

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

08-80736-CV-MARRA 392 P-015183 EFTA00189066

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

a. a. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 2:20 PM To: a (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Yes, that was my plan. | will send it out today. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone From: ( (usaris) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 2:18 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Letterre.Epstein and Protective Order | have not sent Brad the Agreement, and would appreciate it if you could take care of that. Are we sending out parts | and Il, and leaving out the December 2007 letter? Thanks. From: | (USAFLS) Sent: ugust 25, 2008 1:54 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Hi |_| — Thank you for your response. Did you ever send the agreement to Brad? Do you want me to do that? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015184 393 EFTA00189067

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:25 AM EEE 0S; oo 000s; IE os; i ee; Subject: RE: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order During our telephonic hearing, | received the clear impression that Judge Marra wanted the other victims (non-parties to the Jane Doe litigation), would be given the opportunity to see the Agreement, subject to each one agreeing to be bound by the protective order. | believe it would be contrary to Judge Marra’s intent for us to go through the trouble of creating a mechanism for the other non-party victims to have access to the Agreement, and then not tell them there is an Agreement. Also, does CVRA impose any obligation on us, independent of what Judge Marra ordered, to advise the victims of the Agreement? Sent: Monday, August 25, 201 748 AM Tor Acta, Aer (USA) lll sas; I so; TT srs); (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. I have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn’t really require a comment, but I wanted to get — feedback regarding the notification to the victims of their right to see the agreement. Here is the language from my proposed victim notification letter: “In addition, a judge has ordered that the United States make available to any designated victim (and/or her attorney) a copy of the actual agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victim (and/or her attorney) reviews, signs, and agrees to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms. would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature.” Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether || agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the entire agreement available to Mr. Josefsberg and he conveys that information to all of his clients, the concern becomes moot, I suppose. Lastly, from my discussion with a. it appears that the Office does not want to add to the list the names of victims identified after the date of signing thg @7¢@l@WagyexRRnA unless our investigation had provideB-015185 394 EFTA00189068

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

enough information that we were prepared to include them in the indictment i. the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. << File: 080822 Lefkowitz Itr to a Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015186 395 EFTA00189069