CM/ECF - Live Motabase - flsd Page | of 2 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Jane Doe No. 6 v. Epstein Date Filed: 09/10/2008 Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Jury Demand: Plaintiff Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 6 represented by Adam D. Horowitz Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami , FL 33160 LRJ LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey Mare Herman Herman & Mermelstein 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami , FL 33160 Fax: 931-0877 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Stuart S. Mermelstein Herman & Mermelstein 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami , FL 33160 Fax: 931-0877 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED https://ecf. flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?617389682623668-L_801_0-1 10/8/2008 EFTA00175892

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

CM/ECE - Live Mtabase - flsd Page 2 of 2 Vv. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein represented by Robert Deweese Critton , Jr. Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 est Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED TT 09/10/2008 COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Epstein Filing fee $ 350.00. Receipt#: 544159, filed by Jane Doe No. 6.(mg) (Entered: 09/11/2008) 09/10/2008 | 10/2008 2 | Summons Issued as to Jeffrey Epstein. (mg) (Entered: 09/11/2008) 09/15/2008 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Deweese Critton, Jr on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 09/15/2008) 10/03/2008 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Jane Doe No. 6. Jeffrey Epstein served on 9/23/2008, answer due 10/14/2008. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/03/2008) 10/06/2008 5 | ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Kenneth A. Marra for all further proceedings. Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 10-6/08. (gp) (Entered: 10/07/2008) 10/08/2008 CERTIFICATION AND ORDER OF TRANSFER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Magistrate Judge James M. Hopkins no longer assigned as referral judge in case. Case transferred to Judge Marra's paired Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge James M. Hopkins on 10/8/08. (lw1) (Entered: 10/08/2008) PACER Service Center 10/08/2008 17:41:02 ] PACER Login:}}du4480 Client Code: ,||9:08-cv-80994- https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?617389682623668-L_801_0-1 10/8/2008 EFTA00175893

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

{ { On af | Case 9:08-cv-b.494-KAM Docume,..1 Entered v., FLSD Docket 09/11,.408 Page 1 of] 7" UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: JANE DOE NO. 6, 08-CV-80994-Hurley-Hopkins | Plaintiff, vs. FILEDby VT D.C. ELECTRONIC JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SEPT. 10, 2008 Defendant. / STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. OIST. CT, 5.0, OF FLA.» MIAME COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 6 (“Jane” or “Jane Doe”), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows: Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Jane Doe No. 6 is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a minor. 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York. 4. This is an action for damages in excess of $50 million. 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states. 6. Additionally, this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 because Plaintiff alleges a claim under the laws of the United States. This Court has supplemental HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www. hermaniaw.com tof? EFTA00175894

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

08-CM-80994. _aankey-Hopkii.i Entered... FLSD Docket 09/11,108 Page 2 of 7 4 jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C, §1367(a) over all other claims set forth herein which form part of the same case or controversy. 7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1391(a) and 1391(b) asa substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. Factual Allegations 8. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (“Epstein”) was an adult male, approximately 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. Thomas and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein’s conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach. 9. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2004, Jane Doe, then approximately 13 years old, fell into Epstein’s trap and became one of his victims. 10, Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas. 11. Bpstein’s scheme involved the use of young girls to recruit underage girls. These underage girls were recruited ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Epstein, upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from western Palm Beach County who would be enticed by the money HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com 207 EFTA00175895

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

| 08-CM-8099A...antey-Hopkis.1 Entered. FLSD Docket 09/11,.408 Page 3 of 7 being offered - generally $200 to $300 per “massage” session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein’s plan. 12. Epstein’s plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. The underage | victim would be brought or directed to Epstein’s mansion, where she would be led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. The girl would then find herself alone in the room with Epstein, who would be wearing only a towel. He would then remove his towel and lie naked on the massage table, and direct the girl to remove her clothes. Epstein would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation, 13. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, when Jane Doe was only 13 years old, she was recruited by another girl to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation, Jane was brought to Epstein’s mansion in Palm Beach, Once there, she was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. Epstein came into the room and directed Jane to remove her clothes and give him a massage. As directed by Epstein, Jane stripped to her underwear. Epstein then sexually assaulted Jane during the massage. In addition, Epstein masturbated during the massage. Epstein then paid Jane money. 14, As a result of this encounter with Epstein, Jane experienced confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment, and has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries. COUNTI Sexual Assault and Battery 15. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs | through 14 above. 16. Epstein made an intentional, unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Jane Doe, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peri] and sexual assault. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com JOT EFTA00175896

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

a Case 9:08-cv-b.v94-KAM Documeée...1 Entered'c., FLSD Docket 09/11,..v08 Page 4 of 7 17. Epstein intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive sexual contact on the person of Jane Doe. 18. Epstein tortiously committed a sexual assault and battery on Jane Doe. Epstein’s acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful. 19, Epstein’s plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously. 20, As a direct and proximate result of Epstein’s assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 6 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 21. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above. 22. Epstein’s conduct was intentional or reckless. 23, _ Epstein's conduct with a minor was extreme and outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency. 24. — Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe’s mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired, 25. Epstein’s conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com EFTA00175897

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

aoe Case 9:08-cv-bv.s94-KAM Documeé..1 Entered 'u., FLSD Docket 09/11,..u08 Page 5 of 7 damage to Jane Doe, or Epstein acted with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. 26. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein’s intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain, WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 6 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT II Cc and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C, §2422 27. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above. 28. Epstein used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense. 29, Epstein’s acts and conduct are in violation of 18 U.S.C, §2422. 30. Asaresult of Epstein’s violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. 31. Plaintiff hired Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., in this matter and agreed to pay them a reasonable attorneys’ fee. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 6 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for all damages available under 18 U.S.C, §2255(a), including without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, costs of suit, and attorneys’ fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com EFTA00175898

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

[EEE Case 9:08-cv-b..494-KAM Docume,.1 Enteredv.. FLSD Docket 09/11,.v08 Page 6 of 7 JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiff demands a jury trial in this action on all claims so triable. Dated: September /0 , 2008 Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) Stuart S. a 2 Bar No, 947245) Adam D. ee a Bar No. 376980) HERMAN & ELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel; Fax By: HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com EFTA00175899

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Original 08-GMs8OR94rh, . deyahtopbinst,. + COVERS.. FEED. Dosket 0 EY Meg 98ine FpoPad Abia by aw, The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor ‘supplement fi except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) ita) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS JANE DOE NO. 6, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT NEW YORK PALM BEACH COUNTY (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) {EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) OB OV SOC - fir ltd f Ill. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) Herman & .A., 18205 Biscayne Bivd., Suite 2218, Miami, FL 33160, (d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH li, BASIS OF JURISDICTION PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR PLAINTIFE {PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) (For Diversity Case Only) AND ONE FOR DEFEND) PTF DEF PTF DEF Incorporated of Principal Place of QO4 O04 O 1. U.S, Government X 3. Federal Question Citizen of This State o1o1 Business in This State Plaintiff (U.S, Government Nol a Party) Citizen of Another State O2 02 Incorporated and Principal Placeof O5 OS D 2. U.S. Government O 4. Diversity Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country O 3 O 3 Defendant {Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Ker “0 Site zat a mm Foreign Nation a6 O6 ial) 1V. CAUSE OF ACTION (Cr THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE. DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DNERSITY) ACTION FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT UNDER 18 U.S.C, §2422 AND STATE LAW IVa. _5_ days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case | NATURE OF SUIT (PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY) A OTHER STATUS A BANKRUPTCY 0422 Appest 28 USC 198 423 Wardrawal 26 USC 187 A PROPERTY RIGHTS 0290 Mow Vehicle 11.355 Motor Vehicle Product Listy ©.370 Ofer Freud XK 980 Other Personal injury O37) Thm Lendeg B 0.380 Omer Personnel Property Damage S8258283 i S88858 | xT + cd D120 Leber Management (720 Leber’ - teore once (D870 Tanws (U.5. Prerntl ot Defendant) 871 IRS Thad Party 20 USC 7800 VI. ORIGIN x1, Original 02. Removed from 03. Remanded from O14. Refilled 0 6. Mullidistrict Litigation o7. Appeal to District Judge from Proceeding State Court Appellate Court 1 5. Transferred from another district (Specify) Magistrate Judgment Vil, REQUESTED CHECK IF THIS IS A © CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ © Check YES only if demandedin X YES IN COMPLAINT © UNDER F.R.C.P, 23 JURY DEMAND: g NO Vill, RELATED (See Instructions): | (SEE ATTACHED) CASE(S) IF ANY Jane Doe 2 §. Jeffrey Epstein JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe 39. Jeffrey Epstein JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80232-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe 4h Jeffrey Epstein JUDGE KENNETH A MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON JUDGE KENNETH A MARRA DOCKET NUMBER JOHNSON SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: RecelptNo._-.“_ Amoun i: Date Paid: ff 9 wi Jane Doe 5} Jefirey Epstein UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT REV. 9/94 EFTA00175900