To: Se Subject: FW: FOIA # 15600541 - Possible B7A --- UNCLASSIFIED Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 15:03:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Priority: normal Attachments: B7A_EPSTEIN, MARK_1560541.docx; Response to Freedom_of Information Privacy_Acts Request_-_Jeffrey_Epstein_- FOIPA_1560541.pdf Inline-Images: image001.png | am sure you two have, like me, responded to more than your fair share of these.... But see below regarding a FOIA request and response. | have attached what | sent back regarding the request and the b7a letter that has been approved concerning the request. Do you agree with the b7a route for your cases? Let me know and I'll get back to J... Thanks and Happy Friday! Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 2:15 PM Ce > Subject: RE: FOIA # 15600541 - Possible B7A --- UNCLASSIFIED Good afternoon, | wanted to reach back out to see if the b7a still applies to file #’s SO-NY-3027571 and 31-MM-108062? The requests on Epstein and Maxwell are still coming in and by us just getting approval for a b7A for file # 90-NY-3151227, we wanted to bypass sending another EC. Thank you, ) PAC ARTIC - Contractor (POU - IMB/ROC Winchester, VA EFTA00175049

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

R17 Fron: > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2022 11:18 AM Ce: Subject: RE: FOIA # 15600541 - Possible B7A --- UNCLASSIFIED Good Morning i - My apologies for the delay in responding to your email. Yes, the b7A route is appropriate. Thank you! Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 10:39 AM Ce: Subject: FOIA # 15600541 - Possible B7A --- UNCLASSIFIED ©IMD | received your response for Pending File # 90A-NY-3151227 in Sentinel (190-HQ-A3499331-Restricted Serial 2615). Due to your responses, we wanted to see if you would be ok with going the b7A route for the file? Good morning, | have attached a copy of the b7A letter to this email for you to take a look at Thank you, PAC ARTIC - Contractor IPOU - IMB/ROC Winchester, VA EFTA00175050

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED EFTA00175051