From: NY) (FBI) To: ss); MR. MI (uns) (Contractor) { ( 5 Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 5:14:00 PM Everything with the exception of a souls of items are ready. | will ge number before | send it over. We can send it over tomorrow. There will be ReadMe files included so t will be easy to see where the iterns came from. | am a little worried about how the e-mail will present. While looking through on a spot check, the attachments are d to the e-mails in c tool. | believe it is a fu e-mail client they wer o begin with. | know a bit to get it right the fore: that Now that w e attachment f yours. We may have tc e€ a concer e are working rything h cessed, it shouldn't be too big a slowly because it is a ton of pretty small files. You Windows b e and iPad reports, but unsure if! can get you those tomorrow as the So far the export There will be a few y¥ often take a LONG , loose media, etc ng the whole ball of time to copy. Again, lots of small files. If not tomorrow, the next day. ou around tomorrow? Reach out to me when you get the production so we can correct any Ww v night encounter. Thanks rdinator orensic Exam ne - a (<2!) From: A SE (USAN,S) [-2ito es Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2020 3:42 PM To: i a NY) (Fo!) a; GY (USANYS) [Contractor] S'S) a A.) (81) a SS a A (U4) re ee YS a a (USANYS) <_\ > Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents | unders tomorr out who the d Could you please let us know the following information, so we can figure drive should t instance: 3503-034 Page | of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002071 EFTA00157252

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

e How many total devices are coming to us in this initial production? e of device and which ones, from the spreadsheets o What are those devices —i.e., typ you'v e What's the total volume of data coming in this round of production? Once we know that, | can let the agents know where the drive needs to go in the first instance. thanks, = From: i. BENE (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 16:23 Co: A A (SANS) a; (Ny) (FB!) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Checking in for the estimate of when we can expect to get all the USV! materials? thanks, = From: i. EEE (USANYS) Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 13:00 To: i LY) (Fo) a; a PE (SANs) [Contractor] Cc: (SS) IB (0) (F8) > SS a: a (USANYS) <i Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Okay thanks — good luck with the cardiologist! And if you can let us Know tomorrow that would be great. Thanks again Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:59 To: i EE (USANYS) (Contractor) a; a Sy 3503-034 Page 2 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002072 EFTA00157253

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

oO > BE ee — a — yp — (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents When I'm in the office tomorrow, I will be better able to estimate. I'm at my cardiologist right now. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 29, 2020 12:56 PM, " |, ME (USANys)" > wrote: Great, thanks. Is there € h estime of when we will get the USVI r estimate of when you'll b see how many items to export, so we'll when we'll get those? From: i BLY) (3 =____- Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:55 (USANYS) — a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Yep NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 29, 2020 12: |, ME (USANYs)" > wrote: Okay, and I’m sorry to ask again, but to make sure, in this production, you’re sending us new versions of what you previously sent? 3503-034 Page 3 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002073 EFTA00157254

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:50 To: I EE (USANYS) (Contractor) xx: EE CE SANS) i; a I (8) (80) fp) Wer @ | Gn a a eS) a: a (USANYS) <r Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents You are getting both NY and USVI. The biggest stumbling block are the newer Mac items that are in APFS (there are a bunch from the Island,) so it is difficult to estimate how long those will take until I see how many items I have to export. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 29, 2020 12:40 PM, " |, BE (US ANys)" 4 > wrote: Okay thanks, and just to clarify, a few days to finalize the New York materials, and then what about the USVI materials? | think that is quite a bit more. Just looking for an estimated completion date for everything. And on my other question — does this mean you're giving us a new, complete copy of everything from both NY and US\ thanks, = From: i iL (..) ') ——- Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:34 To: i EE (USANYS) (Contractor) xxx: i (USANYS) <j Cc: i EE SANYS) a ; BF () (8) a SS) < >; a (SS) (USANYS) <i Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I am in the process of exporting the materials (documents, spreadsheets, emails, etc) for your review as per my discussions with | Most of the NY stuff is done, just Mac items left. This might take a few days as | item in particular has over 500,000 emails. We will be able to provide discovery once Defense Council has provided drives for us to copy items over to. This goes quicker as there is no processing involved. I'll let you know when everything is complete. 3503-034 Page 4 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002074 EFTA00157255

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Se NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk HS (USANys)" > wrote: On Jun 29, 2020 11:03 AM, " | Following up on this, | understand from [i that she was able to provide you with a 12 TB drive hen we will be able to get the materials? | expect a judge ast week — could you please let us kn will ask us about discovery as ear his week Also, the related critical question that | don’t think we have clarity on is whether you're giving us a > that was collected (including reproc viously gave t searchable), or have you and || ul for us? We wo ngly pre d juste erythir ceina > the prior so they're usable format, but please let us know if you expect to produce materials differently than that from: i BL) | i __Z7,- Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 13:14 To: EE (USANYS) [Contractor] xx: EE. i SA, S) i a I A.) (81 ee es eS) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents We are going every other day now, ramping up to 75% week after next. I need drives to put things on like [J and I discussed earlier. Once I have those drives, it will take me a couple days to copy stuff. LMK when I can expect the drives. Thanks. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 19, 2020 1:09 PM, " , (USANysS)" > wrote: 3503-034 Page 5 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002075 EFTA00157256

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: EE ER (Says) Sent: Wednesday, 14:28 SS SS) LT A A (8) (80) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 16:28 SS CSS) a: I MB (80Y) (8) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Will do. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 1, 2020 4:26 PM, "' . MR (USANysS)" “ > wrote: Understoo for letting us know. Let’s keep in touch both on timing and also on v there's a way to identify and categorize what's already been produced, or if we'll need to just get a the raw data at this stage and go from there 3503-034 Page 6 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002076 EFTA00157257

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: ii BLY) ___- Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 16:23 To: EE EEE (USANYS) (Contractor) a; a, (USANYS) <i 7 | (Ce of, (7. °F SS) A ME (Y) (51) a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents =z. Unfortunately, recent events and our staffing levels have conspired to put a kink in just about everything. If we can't make heads or tails of the stuff I've already produced, we'll do it again. They have told us that our staffing levels will be steadily increasing over the next few weeks, but I'm going to have to push back my estimate by a week or 2. Sorry about that. My next day in the office is Thursday, so I'll be able to see if I can easily identify what I already gave you and marry it to a reliable identifier. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 1, 2020 4:13 PM, "| HE (USANYS)" > wrote: Thanks for this update — we'll take a look and circle back if any questions. Separately, to follow up on a question from the May 15 email below, the list has just five devices as still pending to be transferred to us, and | think it’s right that the plan is to reproduce all the rm? Currently, w materials so that we can get them in searchable format, but just wanted to c aren’t able to match any of the prior productions to specific devices — so if we’re able to match them up by Bates number now, that might work, but otherwise | think it makes sense for us to get everything. But let us know if any issue with that And related to that question, are we still on track to get the full range of data in the next week or so? | don’t think \ gotten any updates on that status in the past few weeks, and we’re eager to be able to start rev thanks again, 3503-034 Page 7 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002077 EFTA00157258

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents Updated item descriptions. Just a side note, many thumb drives and SD cards will not have a serial number visible externally, but will report one through our tools. | included those electronically reported serial numbers. Any questions, let me know FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From| Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 4:11 PM T Cec Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 3503-034 = | a Page 8 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002078 EFTA00157259

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 0 15:54 Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents Here is The listing of all the evidence gathered in NY that | have. | added some columns to guide you to the unique numbers CART NY uses fro their evidence. The template wasn't a slam dunk over, so | did what | could to convey the information. If you are confused by anything, please let me know. In the column for approximate size, it is in GB, totaled at the bottom and converted to TB. In the materials contained column, | put what load file group the data was transferred over in (Mac, Windows, Loose Media, IDE, or Blacklight) If there is no entry in that column, that data h to be transferred. There are 2 Macs and a DVR you don't have as well as an iPhone and an iPad. IF the descriptions are a bit light, let me know and I'll do what | can to beef them up. ! will get you the Island stuff tomorrow. FBIN T Coordinator Senior Examiner 3503-034 Page 9 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002079 EFTA00157260

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: i SAN) <s - Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:25 PM To: i EE 0. (\Y) (Fo!) a; BE (SANS) [Contractor] SSCS CE USNS) i: a I (SANs) a Ln 2 7; bY) 8) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Respectfully, | think there are some miscommunications here — all we have asked is to receive the to. W materials in a format such that we can vi to. We're not able ) them using a sys have acces M Ww ess through any FBI tool, so we asked for the materials to be transferred in a ould put them on Relativity, which both we and the agents can access ave the files in a format that we can produce them to defense counsel. | that in many other cases and it hasn’t previously been an issue. My understanding from | | is that the best way to do it now is just for us (the U.S. Attorney's Office) to get the original files, which our vendor will process—by which | just mean converting into f Relativity. It do rmats that are loadable onto n't really have anything to do with the taint review—we have to have access tc docs in our systems for discovery purposes And we were happy to get the materials as they were processed, but when we received the 1.1 million documents earlier this year, th vere in a format that wasn’t usable for the re ed in the email ton March 9. Again, | understand from Chris that the best st get copies of the materials in their original formats, which | understand will be and designated by dev That should work for us! | was just trying to understand the ap well as the timeline thanks, From: 7 EL (\\) |: > a Tuesday, May 12, 2020 13:03 i SS CS, )S) a: a PID (UsANYs) con actor) Cc SNS a; PIE (SAYS) ao |e fF fy iy (F:) Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents 3503-034 Page 10 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002080 EFTA00157261

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

|e Just to be clear. The US Attorney's Office (or it's contractors) are not "processing" anything. You are taking files that | will be extracting from processed evidence and putting them into an E-Discovery tool (Relativity) to do a taint review. Relativity is NOT a forensic tool. It is incapable of dealing with many things that are found forensically on a computer like free space, slack space, and system files to name a few. When we started this, and you insisted you do the taint review in Relativity, | warned you that it was adding months worth of work on top of what was already done, and that Relativity was incapable of viewing everything. You insisted we do it this way. So now {and | have come up with a way to fit this round peg into this square hole. We will get it done. Sorry it has taken so long, but we are talking about terabytes worth of data over multiple forms of digital evidence. Phones, tablets, loose media, cameras, DVRs, servers, laptops, and desktop computers. We have gotten past encryption on multiple devices. When we review devices on such large cases, we usually do it piece by piece as things are processed, | was unaware that you didn't want to review as things were processed, that you wanted to do it "all at once", so that added to the delay. Sorry for that. Just a differentiation of methodology | suppose. HEM and! fee! confident that the method we have come up with will be more consistent and preserve the attribution of files to devices and links of e-mails to attachments that the load file generation that | did a while back was lacking. FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner n = i=} 3 SS) <r Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:33 AM To: A (NY) (FS) a; a I (SANS) [Contractor] Ce: A (USANYS) i; PD PE (USANys) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Okay, so just to check, you both think that there is not a need to do a test run? You're both comfortable with just basically sending us copies of everything? | don’t totally understand why we couldn't have done that eight months ago, but regardless of the passage of time, | want to make sure we understand so we can report to our supervisors. | assurne that means that we (at the U.S. Attorney’s Office and through contractors) will therefore need to do all the processing ourselves, correct? And thanks again to you both. 3503-034 Page 11 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002081 EFTA00157262

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: i BLO) (3 _____- Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:30 (USANYS) <i Co: (USANYS) a; (Sys) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Like | | said in his earlier email. It will be the raw data and it will be marked so it is easier to attribute it to a particular device. Problem now is how to get the data to | | since he is teleworking. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On May 12, 2020 11:15 AM, " , ME (USANYs)" > wrote: | have no doubt you do, but can you please tell us what that plan is? Thanks! From: ii BLY) ____- Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:11 To: i BE (USANYS) (Contractor) (USANYS) <a Cc: ER SANS) a: a (sss) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I will use the spreadsheet, no problem. J and I ironed out all the details. We've got a good plan moving forward that will meet your needs. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk , ME (USANYs)" > wrote: GE, it would be very helpful for us if you could please transmitting that in o we make sure we get all the inf On May 12, 2020 10:34 AM, "' > the attached spreadsheet in ed. | think you had previously sent us a list of certain information that unfortunately wasn’t h so we want to make sure we’re all on the same page 3503-034 Page 12 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002082 EFTA00157263

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

of all the raw data, and we'll In terms of data tran yu just sending proces pload it sent — when FBI $ and on our end? | ask to make sure we y searchability d. | think wha re, it had already been pro d about on the phone a month ag r example, data from one device to make sure it transfers correctly, before s getting, sending over literally everything — is that still the plan? thanks From: i. ER (USA YS) [Contractor] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 10:27 To: a ES (S48 S) Cc: i PLY) o) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Hello i Me and [J just finished our phone call regarding the data. JJ will put together a list of the all of the data and where the data was collected. | will work to send some hard drives to | so he can begin to copy the data and send it to us. | will need to figure out a way to get the data off of the hard drives Please let us know if there are any questions Thank you = From: a aS (SANS) <i Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 2:15 PM 1 L.-T MN (USA's) a eS a a (USANYS) <a Cc: . ER (USANYS) (Contractor) <q: GE. GE) (SANS) a es < | ee (SS) a 5) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Okay thanks — plea us know if at any that changes, otherwise we'll look forward t being able to review the returns in early June. Thanks again 3503-034 Page 13 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002083 EFTA00157264

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: ii EL) (3) ____- Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 14:14 oS SS) LT; (S004) : USANYS) <i Cc: EE ER (USANYS) (Contractor) <q: BE. BE (USA) a es < | ee (SS) a ee) | <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents There has been talk of us returning to normal soon, so | don't think it will effect the timeline I initially gave you. If it does, I'll let you know. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On May 8, 2020 1:58 PM, " , ME (USANYs)”" > wrote: get Understo thanks—it w that list on Thursday. As a refresh, the info we are is in the attache turns thems that the estimate of a month from iplete trans: Jarrant returns longer lik =t us know what the current es te would be an factor that in? Thanks From: i EL): > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 13:50 oS (SS) a IN (SAS) ftw 7 | Cc: EE. ER (USANYS) (Contractor) < ;: G, E ( sys) a a <<) eS Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Sorry for the delay, they reduced us to | day a week, so things have been stretched out by a factor of 5. I will be back in the office on Thursday and will be able to get you the list then as I have to access some of our systems to do so. Also, [BB please reach out to me at one of the numbers below so we can brain storm. Thanks. 3503-034 Page 14 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002084 EFTA00157265

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On May 8, 2020 12:10 PM, " . BR (USANys)" > wrote: think rrants at gupont zed from the searc York and the USVI, as well as from his on arrest, in about a month alla month a — so wanted to check ct that erson ring our co f we can still ex ry soon? We're waiting on that list to be able to do an updated search Please let us know the current timeline — and also the current warrant on all of those devices producing the results from t e August and September timeline were g rdinate on that ou had mentioned you exp 1 have it a couple 1onths f call, w would be about a month from now » make sure we’re still on track thanks Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 15:27 USNS) i; I I (SAIS) SL Ce: = HS (SANYS) (Cont ractor]) (>: 7 GE (UsAnys) - ___fy . SteeESC=ésEE UN 3) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Ok let’s plan on 11am tomorrow morning, | am trying to get an FBI line with a larger capacity but | won't know until tomorrow am. | will push it out when confirmed Thanks = From: i GE (USANYS) (aio i | a Tuesday, April 07, 2020 3:15 PM i ’) a: I MN (S21 a (USANYS) <i Cc EE (USANYS) (Cont <tc) a A, 3503-034 Page 15 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002085 EFTA00157266

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

(USNS) i; I (y) (2!) <r Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents > anytime tomorrow and QI EE can also join anytime tomorrow. So whenever is good on your end Also, we can host a conference call, but only up to six lines at a time — so if FBI has larger capacity than that let us know, otherwise I'd propose we do nts to join (and if not, one of I / i) From: ZZ HL 3) > Sent: Tue /, April 07, 2020 14:13 To SNS) a; a A (81) (FEN) (USANYS) <a Cc: EE EE (USANYS) (Contractor) i: HE BE (Usanys) EC SC Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Are you available tomorrow for a conference call to discuss this issue? ss\ ii i FBI New York |, ME (USANys)" > wrote: On Apr 7, 2020 1:55 PM, ' = Following up on this from a month ago —| know we're living in a different world than what existed four weeks ago, but are you at all able to assist while working remotely? This has been pending for Sic list o ice or item that was seized onths and we still don’t have a almos wo Ir and searche for which of those we've received materials e’re happy to have a call if that would be us but as a first step the most basic thing we're looking for is the info in the template spreadsheet we sent earlier (that’s also attached) 3503-034 Page 16 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002086 EFTA00157267

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

thanks, From: . ER (says) Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 12:00 To: i SE (\) (°S!) a; a PE SANs) ee (USANYS) <i Cc: I ER (USANYS) (Contractor) <>: GE. GE (Us) a es <> ee (SS) a (°°!) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Unfortunately | don’t think this is very helpful to us. Did you take a look at the example spreadsheet | sent on 2/24? The excel file you sent has descriptions that don’t match up to the items listed in the search warrant returns (that we sent on 2/23), and we don’t have the 1B or CART numbers to be able to cross-reference. We also can’t tell what you mean by “loose media” without a specific comparison to what was seized, we don’t know which iterns you're referring to as “Windows machines,” and we can’t tell whether the entirety of any particular item has been transferred, or just partial. For example, it looks like we have gotten very, very few image files, which is surprising We have also encountered some very significant problems in trying to review the more than 1 million documents we recently received The data we've received has no way to put any emails and attachments together. So if an email says, “see the attached flight records,” for example, we have no way of linking that up with the records themselves. Not only is that a big problem for us in review, it’s going to be a huge problem for producing the documents to defense counsel. The load file has no link to the native file, so when we load the data to the database, there’s no way to have the native files show up in the database. Because many of the files are too arge to open in the viewer, it effectively means that there are many files that are completely nvisible to us. - Related, the control numbers in the load file don’t match up to the native files. So we have two sets of numbers and no way to match up anything—that is, even if we were to try to go hunt down every individual large file in the native files, it would be impossible So the data that we most recently got, we need to get in a form that addresses those issues, and we likely will need to get a similar reproduction of the data we received a couple months ago. Otherwise we're sifting through more than a million documents without much rhyme or reason. I've re-attached the spreadsheet we sent last week —! think that’s a good place to start in terms of 3503-034 Page 17 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002087 EFTA00157268

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

and we need that info att 2ast, as well as anything els e re happy to meet Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2020 16:36 1 ES SS) a: a, PM (USANYS) eo | ae oo . StS Cc: EE EE (USANYS) (Contractor) >; HE BBB (UsANys) | es <> es (SS) es <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents § a listing of wh have already rin load f US Attorney's Office for taint ints of clarification: Th outt DE hard dri d in the Manhattan ) from a July the apartment is included. All the Windows machines from the NY apartment are included. Only 2 Macs one of his properties. | only proce se media from the NY from NY and 1 from the Island are included osely coordinate with whoever is loading up Relativity with the sed with d | will have to more cl I they F remaining Macs as the t sily re-name the load files Spreadsheet is attached NYO CART Co Senior Forensi From: TE PE (USANYS) (mic es Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 12:25 PM a a a (USANYS) <a Ce: PEE (USANYS) (Contractor) as; i i (USNS) a: a <a: a << i. tt. — —s Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 3503-034 Page 18 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002088 EFTA00157269

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

| could do of the me f we can figure out in adva Thursday morning, but | think it wo! be helpful for us to get the accounting n acvance we need —is that rat (if any) additional ste From: ii EL!) (3 Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 09:59 To: (SS) a: a IT! (USANYS) _— \S) iii _ ___!- Cc: EE ER (USANYS) (Contractor) x: BE. EE (USA) > es < | es (SS) es (2) < Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Can we do Thursday morning? My network should be back by then and I can give you a good accounting. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Mar 2, 2020 11:15 AM, " |, MR (USANys)" > wrote: Doing the weekly check in on this — is there a time this week when everyone can meet on this? thanks, From: RE (sys) Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 17:38 To i.) a: a PM LsAys) SS Ce EE USA) (Cont ctor) I: MM (SANYS) ef 9 | jou a 2) <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Totally understand about the network issues—we can relate. | do still think it w’ 1elpful to all sit down together to have an in- n discussion, to make sur folks available for that next erybody is on the same page. Are 1 what | think would be most helpful to facilitate that w 3503-034 Page 19 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002089 EFTA00157270

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

with been reviewed and/or be a spreadsheet of each separate device referenced in the two search warrant returns. columns for whether we’ve dumped the contents, whether t transferred, what portions were transferred, etc seful—and the Something roughly like the attached, with any other categories you think would be u nfo on the attached is mostly hypothetical, obviously, just amples. That will help us fully understand what’s been reviewed, transferred, and received so far, and what remains {Also just on the pictures, we do want copies of those as well, please including from the discs and do was no, we'll need to get those to be able to re n to make sure no CP, and since | think the ) an initial ser the devices —! think FBI was going t w them as we! ansv many thanks, = From: i aL (..) 3) |. Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 09:24 To SNS) a PINE (SAYS) se timer io | | pene —“isSSCS Cc: I. ER (USANYS) [Contractor] x: HE. BE (Us Avys) > SS <0 Ss) eS SS .) :) < Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents =. Sorry for the delayed response. They are tearing out our old network and giving us a new one, they mandated we delete old stuff (about 400 TB worth). Now that they are working on replacing the network, we can do only local work. I should be able to give you an accounting of what is what. I can say, off the top of my head, that all windows based items from the NY search have been handed over as well as all loose media. The CDs from NY only contained pictures, no documents. There are still some Apple items from NY that need to be produced. As far as the Island stuff goes, the Ist item on your spreadsheet, the "kitchen" mac has been produced. Still working on the rest. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk |, MN (USANys)”" > wrote: On Feb 23, 2020 12:21 AM," Team, we're adc essing this so | Following up on the ow from last weekend, I’m still not sure ho thought it would make sense for us to all schedule a (hopefully relatively brief) meeting to all get on 3503-034 Page 20 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002090 EFTA00157271

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

the same page? We didn’t hear back on which files had previously been provided, but our tech folks did their best to differentiate, and we got access to the materials yesterday and its well over a million documents, and we don’t have any idea what we’re looking at —i.e., which devices the materials came from, whether it’s full or partial results, how many more devices we have coming, etc. Based on the attached search warrant returns, it looks like from the New York mansion (the PDF) there are approximately 40 devices that would have storage (computers, hard drives, thumb drives, etc.) and that’s not even counting at least 60+ CDs. And then from the Virgin Islands (the Excel spreadsheet), at least more than 25 devices, including multiple servers / server racks. So we gotta know what we've already received, what remains, anticipated schedule, etc, and | know it’s a lot of moving pieces on all sides so wanted to loop in everybody at once. The case team will be in California this coming week from Tuesday through Friday, but then | think generally around the first week of March, which will hopefully be plenty of time to schedule a productive meeting. thanks all, From: i MRE (USANYS) Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 16:30 1 i LY) I (0) (8 FTC‘ Ce: EE MEE (USANYS) (Contractor) as: ; | a SS) <a ee (SVS) FC“ SC Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I'm not sure who's the exact right person to ask this, so wanted to get everybody on one email chain about it —! have the hard drive that dropped off that has new Epstein search warrant materials, but it looks like there are also old materials (that | think we had previously received and uploaded??) on the hard drive, and so I’m not sure what's new. Just generally, and [J and | talked about this last week too, but it’s basically impossible for us to keep track of what we’re getting, and what has been completed, without some kind of identification or labeling system, along with a list of which devices have been extracted and downloaded. So for example on the hard drive currently, there are 38 folders labeled “loadFiles” through “37loadFiles” with a modified date of 11/14/19, which | think we may have already previously received — but I’m not sure, because we haven’t gotten any info on which folders match up to which devices, etc. And then there’s another folder titled “NYCO24362” that has a modified date of 1/27/20, so | think that may be the materials we hadn't previously received? That folder by itself has 3503-034 Page 21 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002091 EFTA00157272

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

more than 600,000 items. | don’t want to give Jj anything that we've already previously received and uploaded, and | can't tell from the folder or file names whether everything on the drive is new, or whether just additional materials were saved onto it in addition to what we already have. | are you able to give us some guidance on this? Ultimately what we really need is a spreadsheet of every device, whether it’s been dumped (or partially dumped), and then identifying that same info — which device, and what materials from it — are being given to us with each data transfer. Otherwise | think organizationally and for review purposes it will be a total disaster for us. We're happy to have a meeting on this if that’s helpful — and thanks everybody for the assistance. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York 3503-034 Page 22 of 22 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002092 EFTA00157273