From: (USANYS) (NY) 7 USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 4:23:34 PM Checking in for the estimate of when we can expect to get all th materials? thanks, = From: A BEEN (USANYS) Sent: Monday, June 29 20 13:00 To: i 2 6. (NY) (§o!) a; (USAnys) [Contractor Co: A (SANS) <a; a (Ny) (F381) a SS) <r a (Svs) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents great. Thanks again Okay thanks From: ii ELOY) ( ______- Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:59 To: EE (USANYS) (Contractor) i; i Ts Cc: TE (SANS) i; I (NY) (8!) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents When I'm in the office tomorrow, | will be better able to estimate. po NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk 3503-030 Page | of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002047 EFTA00157229

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

M." |, BR (USANYs)" > wrote: On Jun 29, 2020 12:56 P’ will get the USVI material s to export, so we'll have a bett Sent: Monday, June 2 ) To: (SAN Ys) (Contractor) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Yep NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk |, (USANys)" > wrote: and I’m sorry to ask again, but to make sure, in this production, you’re sending us new On Jun 29, 2020 12:52 PM, " versions of what you p From: i BLY 3) az, Sent: Monday, June 29, (USANYS) <i Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents You are getting both NY and USVI. The biggest stumbling block are the newer Mac items that are in APFS (there are a bunch from the Island.) so it is difficult to estimate how long those will take until I see how many items I have to export. NY CART Coordinator 3503-030 Page 2 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002048 EFTA00157230

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 29, 2020 12:40 PM, " |, ME (USANys)" 4 > wrote: ays to finalize the N | ik that is quite a bit more. Just loc Okay thanks, and just to clarify, a fe fork materials, and then what about the USVI materials? | th oking for an estimated completion date for everything other q And on my on — does this mean you're giving us a new, complete copy « from both NY and US thanks, = From: i i.) 3) |, Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:34 To: EE (USANYS) (Contractor) xxx >: i (USANYS) <i Cc: (SANS) i; a (y) (81 . ll COC ke a S(T (USANYS) <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I am in the process of exporting the materials (documents, spreadsheets, emails, etc) for your review as per my discussions with [- Most of the NY stuff is done, just Mac items left. This might take a few days as | item in particular has over 500,000 emails. We will be able to provide discovery once Defense Council has provided drives for us to copy items over to. This goes quicker as there is no processing involved. I'll let you know when everything is complete. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner desk On Jun 29, 2020 11:03 AM, " — Following up on this, | understand from [jj that she was week — could you please let us we will be ab! HS (USANys)" > wrote: a 12 T8 drive | expect a judge Oo provide you with et the materials? will ask us about discov Also, the related critical question that | don’t think we have clarity on is whether you're giving us a 3503-030 Page 3 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002049 EFTA00157231

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

f everything that w t which are not searchable), or hav jas collected (including reproducing the you and Hl ficu prefer to just get everything at once ina productions so they're useful for us? We would sable format, but p et us know if you expect to produce materials differently than that = Sent: Friday, June 19, 2: 13:14 To: EEE (USANYS) (Contractor) E>; i (USANYS) <> Cc: ES (USNS) i; a! (Ny) (8!) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents We are going every other day now, ramping up to 75% week after next. I need drives to put things on like r | and I discussed earlier. Once | have those drives, it will take me a couple days to copy stuff. LMK when I can expect the drives. Thanks. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner HR (USANys)" wrote: From: ME (USNs) Sent: Wednesday, June 1 a T°) (5) — SS 5: ) A (54's) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 3503-030 Page 4 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002050 EFTA00157232

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

rom i i) Sent: Monday, June 01, 2 S'S) (6%) (80 — —— 7 Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Will do. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 1, 2020 4:26 PM, " |, ME (USANys)" > wrote: Underst there's z d thanks f o identify a the raw data at this stage and g 9 in touch bot! been produced timing and a Let’s ategori or if we'll need t From: ii EL): > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 16:23 — SE (SANS) a; I (Ny) (F8!) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Unfortunately, recent events and our staffing levels have conspired to put a kink in just about everything. If we can't make heads or tails of the stuff I've already produced, we'll do it again. 3503-030 Page 5 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002051 EFTA00157233

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

They have told us that our staffing levels will be steadily increasing over the next few weeks, but I'm going to have to push back my estimate by a week or 2. Sorry about that. My next day in the office is Thursday, so I'll be able to see if I can easily identify what I already gave you and marry it to a reliable identifier. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk ME (UsANys)" > wrote: On Jun 1, 2020 4:13 PM, " = Thanks for this update — we'll take a look and circle back if any questions. Separately, to follow up on a question from the May 15 email below, the list has just five devi e all the still pending to be transferred to us, and | think it’s right that the plan is to reprod materials so that we can get them in searchable format, but just wanted to confirm? Currently, we aren’t able to match any of the prior productions to specific devices — so if we’re able to match them up by Bates number now, that might work, but otherwise | think it makes sense for us to get everything. But let us know if any issue with that And related to that question, are we still on track to get the full range of data in the next week or so? | don’t think we've gotten any updates on that status in the past few weeks, and we’re eager to be able to start reviewing thanks again, From: i i LY) (3) Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 12:53 a [Contractor] <q CE USS) IN (LSA0yS) SS SS (..) () a: TT ) Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents Updated item descriptions. Just a side note, many thumb drives and SD cards will not have a serial number visible externally, but will report one through our tools. | included those electronically reported serial numbers. Any questions, let me know. 3503-030 Page 6 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002052 EFTA00157234

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 3503-030 Page 7 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002053 EFTA00157235

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: i BLY)? zz, Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 15:54 oS S/S) TL; TT (SAYS) [Contractor] <a Ce i (SNS) a USA NYS) eS ES (\) <a: a :) Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents | Here is The listing of all the evidence gathered in NY that | have. | added some columns to guide you to the unique numbers CART NY uses fro their evidence. The template wasn't a slam dunk over, so | did what | could to convey the information. If you are confused by anything, please let me know. In the column for approximate size, it is in GB, totaled at the bottom and converted to TB. In the materials contained column, | put what load file group the data was transferred over in (Mac, Windows, Loose Media, IDE, or Blacklight) If there is no entry in that column, that data has yet to be transferred. There are 2 Macs and a DVR you don't have as well as an iPhone and an iPad. IF the descriptions are a bit light, let me know and I'll do what | can to beef them up. | will get you the Island stuff tomorrow. FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From: i ST (USA\S) <n Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:25 PM o: EE ES (NY) (FS!) a; EE (US ANys) (Contractor) a Ce: A (USANYS) <i; PD PR (USANYS) 5) <r LY) (3) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Respectfully, | think there are some miscommunications here — all we have asked is to receive the materials in a format such that we can view them using a sys have access to. We're not able 3503-030 Page 8 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002054 EFTA00157236

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

to get web-enabled access through any FBI tool, so we asked for the materials to be transferred in a oadable format so we could put therm on Relativity, which both we and the agents can access. We're required to have the files in a format that we can produce them to defense counsel. I’ve done that in many other cases and it hasn’t previously been an issue. My understanding from is that the best way to do it now is just for us (the U.S. Attorney's Office) to get the original files, which our vendor will process—by which | just mean converting into file formats that are loadable onto Relativity. It doesn’t really have anything to do with the taint review—we have to have access to the docs in our systems for discovery purposes. And we were happy to get the materials as they were processed, but when we received the 1.1 million documents earlier this year, they were in a format that wasn’t usable for the reasons described in the email | sent on March 9. Again, | understand from [that the best way forward s to just get copies of the materials in their original formats, which | understand will be segregated and designated by device. That should work for us! | was just trying to understand the approach, as well as the timeline. thanks, rom: i A.) —|€- Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 13:03 To: SUSAN) a (S915) [Contractor] (i > Cc: i EE (USANYS) i; i PE (USANys) SS ES ()) (5!) a; TS (17) (Fo) Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents | Just to be clear. The US Attorney's Office (or it's contractors) are not "processing" anything. You are taking files that | will be extracting from processed evidence and putting them into an E-Discovery tool (Relativity) to do a taint review. Relativity is NOT a forensic tool. It is incapable of dealing with many things that are found forensically on a computer like free space, slack space, and system files to name a few. When we started this, and you insisted you do the taint review in Relativity, | warned you that it was adding months worth of work on top of what was already done, and that Relativity was incapable of viewing everything. You insisted we do it this way. So now [J and | have come up with a way to fit this round peg into this square hole. We will get it done. Sorry it has taken so long, but we are talking about terabytes worth of data over multiple forms of digital evidence. Phones, tablets, loose media, cameras, DVRs, servers, laptops, and desktop computers. We have gotten past encryption on multiple devices. When we review devices on such large cases, we usually do it piece by piece as things are processed, | was 3503-030 Page 9 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002055 EFTA00157237

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

unaware that you didn't want to review as things were processed, that you wanted to do it "all at once", so that added to the delay. Sorry for that. Just a differentiation of methodology | suppose. HB and | feel confident that the method we have come up with will be more consistent and preserve the attribution of files to devices and links of e-mails to attachments that the load file generation that | did a while back was lacking FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From: iS SS (USS) <i Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:33 AM To: (NY) (Fo) a; IIT (UsANys) [Contractor] Ce: (SANS) a; a PE (SANS) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents a test run? You're both a need to do 1g us copies of everything? | don’t totally understand why we have done that eight months a but regardless of the passage of time, | want to make | assume that mea hat we (at the U.S. fice and through contra )w to do all the processing ourselves ect? And thanks again to you both From: i BLO: —____z- Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:30 (USANYS) <a Cc: (USANYS) pm (US ANys) _ FTC Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Like | | said in his earlier email. It will be the raw data and it will be marked so it is easier to attribute it to a particular device. Problem now is how to get the data to | | since he is teleworking. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner a «|! 3503-030 Page 10 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002056 EFTA00157238

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

CE (csi On May 12, 2020 11:15 AM, " , MR (USANYs)" > wrote: you do, but can you please tell us what that plan is? Thanks! From: ii BLY) ( Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:11 To: EE (USANYS) (Contractor) >; i Sy (USANYS) <> Co: A a USANYS) E:T PE USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I will use the spreadsheet, no problem. | | and I ironed out all the details. We've got a good plan moving forward that will meet your needs. a NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk , ME (USANYs)" > wrote: On May 12, 2020 10:34 AM, " HE it would be tran ng that in ry helpful for us if you could please u he attached spreadsheet in ed o we make sur we get all the infc think you had pr us a list of certain information that ur we’re all on the same page In terr s of data transfer, J are you jus and upload it on our end? | ask to make ding a literal copy o re we don versions before, it had already been pro ith ag was getting, for example, data fro g over literally everything — is that still th From: (USANYS) [Contractor] <> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 10:27 oS (0S) a CE .) °°) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 3503-030 Page | 1 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002057 EFTA00157239

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Hello Me and | ss t finished our phone call reg the all of the data a vhere the data was co data off of the hard drives arding the data HE il! put tog d. | will work to send ve hard driv he can begin to copy the data and send it to us. | will need to figure out a way to get the Please let us know if there are any questions Thank you = Sent: Friday May 8, 2020 2 15P A To.) oa II (says) > (2) a: (USANYS) <j (Contractor) is Wl WM (USAnys) a | Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Okay thanks — please do let us know if at any point that changes, otherwise we'll look forward to being able to review the returns in early June. Thanks oe Friday, May 08, 2020 14:1 To: ES (SANS) i; a PG (SANS) a .) ) a (USANYS) <a Cc: EE (USANYs) (Contractor) >; GY (UsaAnys) a es < (S45) ee) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents There has been talk of us returning to normal soon, so I don't think it will effect the timeline I initially gave you. If it does, I'll let you know. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell 3503-030 Page 12 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002058 EFTA00157240

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

CE (csi On May 8, 2020 1:58 PM, " , MR (USANys)" > wrote: d, thanks—it will be great tc Unders Zet that list on Thursday. As a refresh, the info we are ooking is in the attached spreadsheet template n the returns themselve mentioned mean that the estimate of a month from now for complete transmission of the search warrant returns is no longer likely? If sc i be, s ase let us know what the current estimate wo can factor that in? Thanks very much From: 7 EL) |) > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 13:50 To: ES (SANS) a: a PE (USA) re es 8) <a: (USAN'S) . Cc: EY (USANYS) (Contractor) x; TE. EE (UsAnys) > re < | ee SS) eS a tC“‘ONCOCSS Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Sorry for the delay, they reduced us to | day a week, so things have been stretched out by a factor of 5. I will be back in the office on Thursday and will be able to get you the list then as I have to access some of our systems to do so. Also, [B. please reach out to me at one of the numbers below so we can brain storm. Thanks. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On May 8, 2020 12:10 PM, " | (USANys)" > wrote: Following up on the b v, | think you had said you expected to be able to get us a list of the devices at Eps person upon arrest, in about a month (during our co ork and the USVI, as well as from his ein’s residences in d from th arch warrant erence call a month ago) — so wanted to check f we can still expect that y soon? We're waiting on that list to be able to do an updated search warrant on all of those devices. Please let us know the current timeline — and also the current nk you and | | we'd have it a couple oducing the results from those August and September searches? | th timeline ordinate on tha had mentioned you expec W. hich would be about a month from now. Wan o make sure we’re still on 3503-030 Page 13 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002059 EFTA00157241

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

track thanks, ae Tuesday, April 07, 202 a (USAN'S) <r Cc: EE (SANS) (Contractor) <j: GE (says) | es <> es (SS) > es (S| Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents get an FBI line with a larger capacity but Ok (J plan on 11am tomorrow morning, | am trying jon’t know until tomorrow am. | will push it out whe n confirmed From: SS MEE (USANYS) (cai: Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 3:15 PM To: ES (\Y) (FS!) a; I (USA's) ee ee ee) >: (USANYS) <r Cc: ES (USANYS) (Contractor) <i >; i. (USANYS) SS; ES (\y) (S|) <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Yes, | can do anytime tomorrow, and [ij IJ can also join anytime tomorrow. So whenever is pood on your end $ at a time — so if FBI has larger capacity if either of you wants to join (and if not, one mm” iz 3503-030 Page 14 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002060 EFTA00157242

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 14:13 (USANYS) a: a IN (Ny) (FBI) a SS) rr: \\ ——a a - as —cC USANYS) ee) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Are you available tomorrow for a conference call to discuss this issue? FBI New York On Apr 7, 2020 1:55 PM, " , MR (USANys)" > wrote: Following up on this from a month ago —! know we're living in a different world than what existed four weeks ago, but are you at all abl while workin y? This has been pending for onths and we still don’t h two alme ce or item that was seized and would be Ww rched, or for which of those we've rece vappy to have a call if that but as a first step the most basic thing we’re looking for is the info in the template spreadshee sent earlier (that’s also attached) thanks, = From: EE, EEE (USANYS) Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 12:00 To: i a: a |. a a (USANYS) <r Cc: EY (SAN YS) (Contractor) x; TH. GY (sans) > SS <5) SS (2) <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents G Unfortuna don’t think this is very helpful to us. Did you take a look at the example spreadsheet | sent on 2 ’ The excel file you sent has descriptions that don’t match up to the items listed in the 3503-030 Page 15 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002061 EFTA00157243

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

to be search warrant returns (that we sent on 2/23), and we don’t have the 1B or CART numb able oss-reference. We also can’t tell what you mean by “loose media” without a specific ‘re referring to as “Windows comparison to what was seized, we don’t know which items yo ular item has been transferred, or just machines,” and we can’t tell whether the entirety of any part partial. For example, it looks like we have gotten very, very few image files, which is surprising We have also encountered some very significant problems in trying to review the more than 1 million documents we recently received The data we've received has no way to put any emails and atta 1ents together. So if an email says, “see the attached flight records,” for example, we have no way of linking that up with the records themselves. Not only is that a big problem for us in review, it’s going to be a huge problem for producing the documents to defense counsel - The load file has no link to the native file, so when we load the data to the database, there’s no way to have the native files show up in the database. Because many of the files are too arge to open in the viewer, it effectively means that there are many files that are completely nvisible to us. Related, the control numbers in the load file don’t match up to the native files. So we have two sets of numbers and no way to match up anything—that is, even if we were to try to go hunt down every individual large file in the native files, it would be impossible So the data that we most recently got, we need to get in a form that addresses those issues, and we likely will need to get a similar reproduction of the data we received a couple months ago. Otherwise we're sifting through more than a million documents without much rhyme or reason I've re-attached the spreadsheet we sent last week —! think that’s a good place to start in terms of our necessary record-keeping, and we need that info at the very least, as well as anything else you think would be useful. Also attaching the SW returns for reference. And again, we’re happy to meet up anytime and hash all this out in person if that’s useful. thanks, = From: i a L\) (Fe!) Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2020 16:36 To SS SNS) a; (sys) a es) 3) a (USANYS) <r Cc: RE (USANYS) (Contractor) <>; GE. GE (UsAnys) | es < (SS) es) 8) < Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents 3503-030 Page 16 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002062 EFTA00157244

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Office for taint ihat o the US Attor ney the Mar review. Some points of apa one of his p ment, they turned out to apartment is included. All the Windows machines from the NY apartment are inc from NY and 1 from the Island are included | will have to more closely coordinate with whoever is loading up Relativity with the remaining Macs ast have to be proc the load files essed wi Spreadsheet is attached NYO Coordinator senior rorensic cxaminer —— a From: i EE (SAYS) (ct sre Tuesday, March 03, 2020 12:25 PM a a a (USANYS) <i (USANYS) <_TT- ——_ —— SANS) i; (1) (5!) <i Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents | could do of the m Thursday morning, but | think it ould be helpful for us to get the accounting in advance jditional ste s that g so we can figure out in advance what (if any) S we need From: 7 BLY) |: ______- Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 09:59 oC es) a (USANYS) <r Cc: EE (USANYS) (Contractor) <x; BE. GE (USA) af 9 | Jou a SS ) (:)) <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Can we do Thursday morning? My network should be back by then and I can give you a good accounting. 3503-030 Page 17 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002063 EFTA00157245

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk |, HR (US ANys)" > wrote: Doing the weekly check in on this — is there a time this week when everyone can meet on this? On Mar 2, 2020 11:15 AM, " thanks, = From: i MM (USANYS) Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 17:38 To: i 1) (Fo) a; I (UsAnys) (USANYS) <a Cc: EY (USANYS) (Contractor) >: GH. BE (USANys) es < | ee (SS) > (8) 2) <r Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Totally understand about the network issues—we can relate. | do still think it will be helpful to all sit ave an in-p sion, to make su on the same pag ndv be a spreadsheet of each separate device referenced in the two search warrant returns, with folks available for that next what | think would be t helpful to facilitate that wo columns for whether we’ve dumped the contents, whether they’ve been reviewed and/or you think would be useful — and the hypothetica obviously, just a amples. That will > us fully d so far, and what remains. ell, plea ncluding from the discs and the de —| think FB do an initial ser > make sure no CP, and since | think the no, we’ oO, we ansv Nase to be abl v them as well.) many thanks, From: i L(Y) (°°) Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 09:24 3503-030 Page 18 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002064 EFTA00157246

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

oS SS) a ST! (SANS) a: (USANYS) <i Cc: NN (USANYS) [Contractor] i: i PM (USANYS) ._ yf 9 | jou SS ES (8) (3!) <a Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Sorry for the delayed response. They are tearing out our old network and giving us a new one, they mandated we delete old stuff (about 400 TB worth). Now that they are working on replacing the network, we can do only local work. I should be able to give you an accounting of what is what. I can say, off the top of my head, that all windows based items from the NY search have been handed over as well as all loose media. The CDs from NY only contained pictures, no documents. There are still some Apple items from NY that need to be produced. As far as the Island stuff goes, the Ist item on your spreadsheet, the "kitchen" mac has been produced. Still working on the rest. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner |, ME (USANys)" > wrote: On Feb Team, Following up on the below from last weekend, I’m still not sure how we're addressing this so | tho t it would make sense for us to all schedule a (hopefully relatively brief) meeting to all get on the same page? We didn’t hear back on which files had previously been provided, but our tech folks did their best to differentiate, and we got access to the materials yesterday and its well over a million documents, and we don’t have any a what we're looking at —i.e., which devices the materials came from, whether it’s full or partial results, how many more devices we have coming, Based on the attached search warrant returns, it looks like from the New York mansion (the PDF) there are approximately 40 devices that would have storage (computers, hard drives, thumb drives, etc.) and that’s not ev unting at least 60+ CDs. And then from the Virgin Islands (the Excel spreadsheet), at least more than 25 devices, including multiple servers / server racks So we gotta know what we've already received, what remains, anticipated s , and | know t’s a lot of moving pieces on all sides so wanted to loop in everybody at once. The case team will be n California this coming week from Tuesday through Friday, but then | think generally around the first week of March, which will hopefully be plenty of time to schedule a productive meeting. thanks all, 3503-030 Page 19 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002065 EFTA00157247

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: i EE (USANys) Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 16:30 To SY) SS (0) (68 Se Cc: EE (USANYS) [Contractor] i>; a’ a a SS a a ee (S45) as Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I'm not sure who's the exact right person to ask this, so wanted to get everybody on one email chain about it —! have the hard drive that | dropped off that has new Epstein search warrant materials, but it looks like there are also old materials (that | think we had previously received and uploaded??) on the hard drive, and so I’m not sure what's new. Just generally, and || and | talked about this last week too, but it’s basically impossible for us to keep track of what we're getting, and what has been completed, without some kind of identification or labeling system, along with a list of which devices have been extracted and downloaded. So for example on the hard drive currently, there are 38 folders labeled “loadFiles” through “37loadFiles” with a modified date of 11/14/19, which | think we may have already previously received — but I’m not sure, because we haven’t gotten any info on which folders match up to which devices, etc. And then there’s another folder titled “NYCO24362” that has a modified date of 1/27/20, so | think that may be the materials we hadn't previously received? That folder by itself has more than 600,000 items. | don’t want to give || anything that we've already previously received and uploaded, and | can’t tell from the folder or file names whether everything on the drive is new, or whether just additional materials were saved onto it in addition to what we already have. |g are you able to give us some guidance on this? Ultimately what we really need is a spreadsheet of every device, whether it’s been dumped (or partially dumped), and then identifying that same info — which device, and what materials from it — are being given to us with each data transfer. Otherwise | think organizationally and for review purposes it will be a total disaster for us. We're happy to have a meeting on this if that’s helpful — and thanks everybody for the assistance. Pj Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York 3503-030 Page 20 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002066 EFTA00157248

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

3503-030 Page 21 of 21 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00002067 EFTA00157249