® Check for updates I ; | TRAUMA, VIOLENCE & ABLISE 11S © The Author(s) 2016 Repeinas and permission: sagepub. com/journalsPermissions.nay DOE 10.1177/1524838016659484 ta sagepub.com (SAGE Responding to Delayed Disclosure of Sexual Assault in Health Settings: A Systematic Review Stephanie Lanthier', Janice Du Mont'”, and Robin Mason' Abstract This delayed disclosure may be challenging to support workers, including those in health-care settings, who lack the knowledge and skills to respond effectively. We con- ducted a systematic literature review of health-care providers’ responses to delayed disclosure by adolescent and adult female sexual assault survivors. Our primary objective was to determine how health-care providers can respond appropriately when presented with a delayed sexual assault disclosure in their practice. Arising out of this analysis, a secondary objective was to document recommendations from the articles for health-care providers on how to create an environment conducive to disclosing and support disclosure in their practice. These recommendations for providing an appropriate response and sup- porting disclosure are summarized. Keywords sexual assault, adolescent victims, adult victims, reporting/disclosure, support seeking Sexual assault in adolescence and adulthood is a pervasive, violent crime that results in a significant trauma to victims, with negative health impacts that can persist for appreciable amounts of time (Cahill, 2009). Although research has shown that men and transgendered persons experience sex- ual assault (Du Mont, Macdonald, White, & Turner, 2013; Mcdonald & Tijerino, 2013), it is women who continue to be disproportionately impacted (World Health Organization, 2013). Women who have been sexually assaulted report poorer health and use medical services more frequently than those who have not been sexually assaulted (Du Mont & White, 2007; Resnick et al., 2000). Negative health outcomes include immediate physical injuries, pregnancy, gynecological compli- cations (e.g., vaginal bleeding, infection, pain during inter- course, chronic pelvic pain) and mental health consequences including depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Wathen, 2012). More severe sexual assaults have been associated with worse health outcomes than less severe assaults (Ullman & Brecklin, 2003; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). Despite its significant health impacts, sexual assault remains underreported (Du Mont & White, 2007). Although more than one third (39%) of Canadian women report having experienced a sexual assault (Statistics Canada, 1994), less than 10% of these assaults are reported to law enforcement (Statistics Canada, 1994). Underreporting of sexual assault is also a prob- lem in the United States where it has been found that only an estimated 28% of sexual assaults were reported to law enforce- ment in 2012 (Truman, Langton, & Planty, 2013). (NEVE PABHNIIIT)) Disclosure most often occurs weeks, months, or years after the assault (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Esposito, 2006; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Lessing, 2005; Mon- roe et al., 2005; Plumbo, 1995; Ullman, 1996a) with fewer survivors disclosing in the acute period (7 days or less) when specialized sexual assault services (e.g., Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs) may be available in some jurisdictions (Du Mont & White, 2007; Resnick et al., 2000; Zinzow, Resnick, Barr, Danielson, & Kilpatrick, 2012). Survivors most often choose to disclose to informal support providers such as friends, family, or an intimate partner, with ‘Women's College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ? Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Corresponding Author: Stephanie Lanthier, Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Floor 6, Rm. 6443, Toronto, Ontario, Canada MSS 1B2. Email: stephanie lanthier@mailutoronte.ca 3502-017 Page | of 15 EFTA_00001476 EFTA00156817

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

substantially fewer disclosing to formal support providers including police, health-care providers, mental health profes- sionals, and rape crisis workers (Baker, Campbell, & Straat- man, 2012). Although informal support providers are often a good source of social and emotional support for survivors, it is formal support providers who are well positioned to assist women in their recovery through the provision of services that address the physical and mental health consequences of sexual assault (World Health Organization, 2013). Health- care providers in particular have the potential to play a central role in assisting women in their recovery. In addition to pro- viding health care in the aftermath of sexual assault, they are uniquely positioned to act as a gateway, providing referrals to counseling, social, and legal services (World Health Organi- zation, 2013). Women who have experienced violence often seek out health care though they may not disclose sexual assault to their health-care providers (World Health Organization, 2013). Those who do disclose to health-care providers suggest that too often they receive inappropriate responses to their disclo- sure (Baker et al., 2012; Borja, Callahan, & Long, 2006). Neg- ative responses from support providers, including health-care providers, have been associated with greater PTSD symptom severity, depression, and physical health symptoms, as well as predictive of maladaptive coping by survivors (Baker et al., 2012; Borja et al., 2006; World Health Organization, 2013). Evaluations of acute sexual assault services are clear that sur- vivors positively rate providers trained to deliver an appropri- ale response to sexual assault disclosure, one that sensitively addresses both their medical and social/emotional needs (e.g., Du Mont et al., 2014). Therefore, health-care providers who come into contact with sexual assault survivors who delay disclosure also should know how to respond appropriately (World Health Organization, 2013). The purpose of this study was to examine health-care pro- viders’ responses when presented with a delayed sexual assault disclosure by adult and adolescent female survivors in their practice. Our primary objective was to determine how health-care providers can respond appropriately to delayed disclosure in health-care settings. Arising out of this analysis, a secondary objective was to document authors’ recommen- dations for health-care providers on how to create an environ- ment conducive to disclosing and support disclosure in their practice. To answer these questions, we conducted a systema- tic review of the literature centered on health-care providers’ responses to the delayed disclosure of sexual assault. To our knowledge, no best-evidence synthesis has been conducted in this area to date. Method Literature Search In consultation with a medical librarian, we conducted a search of OVID Medline, EMBASE, Psyclnfo, and PubMed using combinations of the following terms: “truth disclosure,” TRAUMA, VIOLENCE, & ABUSE “disclosure,” “self-disclosure,” “self-reporting,” “rape,” “sexual assault,” “‘sexual violence,”’ “sexual trauma,” “post-assault,” “post-rape,” “‘sex,” “sexual,” “post-trau- matic,” “PTSD,” “psycho-trauma,” “social support,” “social perception,” “social adjustment,” “patient acceptance of health care,” “health services accessibility,” “communication barriers,” “health personnel,” “health care facilities, man- power, services,” “primary health care,” “general practice,” “patient care,” “support,” “reaction,” “barrier,” “examiner,” “clinician,” “doctor,” “provider,” “nurse,”’ “‘formal,” “informal,” and “long term.” The search was limited to English language records pub- lished between 1985 and 2013. In addition, we hand-searched the reference lists of relevant articles. In total, we identified 1,166 records. After removing duplicates, the total remaining was 779 (see Figure 1). Selection of Included Articles In the first stage of the review, all three authors screened the titles of the 779 records. Articles were set aside for further review if their titles contained the terms “rape,” “sexual assault,” “sexual trauma,” “sexual violence,” or “unwanted sexual attention.” Titles that contained the word “sexual abuse” were included if it was clear that the term referred to the sexual abuse of adults or adolescents, or where it was unclear whether the term referred to adults or adolescents. Any title that clearly referred to child sexual assault or abuse or sexual assault of adult males was excluded. Additionally, we excluded titles where it was apparent that the focus was solely on acute sexual assault, as well as titles that focused on sexual offenders. Finally, we excluded identifiable dissertations, chap- ters, book reviews, books, editorials, commentaries, conference proceedings, and any remaining non-English language articles. The title screen yielded a total of 178 records. The abstracts for each of these records were subsequently screened for fur- ther review by two authors. Articles were set aside for further review if abstracts referred to responses to disclosure from formal sources of support (physicians, therapists, police, etc.), formal and informal (friends or family) sources of support, and in instances where it was unclear whether disclosure was to formal or informal support persons. Abstracts that referred solely to disclosure to informal support sources were excluded, as were those which focused on acute sexual assault, child sexual assault or abuse, or routine screening for violence (although articles referring to “assessment” were included). Also excluded were abstracts where disclosure was made within the mental health-care system, as these professionals are assumed to have received specialized training. Dissertations, chapters, book reviews, books, editorials, commentaries, fact sheets, and conference proceedings were also excluded. The abstract screen yielded 49 articles for which a full review was conducted by two authors. Articles were included in the final sample only if they included responses to disclosure of sexual assault to a health-care provider. If the only health- care provider included was a mental health professional, the 3502-017 Page 2 of 15 EFTA_00001477 EFTA00156818

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Lanthier et al. Records identified through database search (N= 1162) Titles assessed for eligibility (N=779) Full-text articles assessed for eligibility {N=49) Articles included (N=23) “Some records excluded based on more than one criteria. Figure 1. Flowchart of search results. article was excluded as were any remaining articles focused on child sexual assault or abuse. Data Abstraction The final sample included 23 articles. From the articles, we extracted country, participants, disclosure recipients, meth- ods, key findings, including helpful and unhelpful responses to sexual assault, and specific recommendations from the arti- cles for health-care providers to create a suitable environment for and improve their response to delayed disclosures of sex- ual assault and organized the information in table format (see Table 1). Helpful and unhelpful responses, and recommenda- tions to improve health-care provider responses, were Additional records identified through reference lists of key articles (N=4) Records after duplicates rernoved (N=779) Abstracts assessed for eligibility (N=178) Titles excluded (N=601*) Sexual Assault of Related Terms Not in Title (N=369) Childhood or Male Sexual Assault (N=169) Book Chapters, Dissertations, ete. (N=100) Focused on Offender (N=9) Not in English (N=7) Acute Sexual Assault (N=6) Abstracts excluded (N=129*) No Response to Disclosure (N=98} Book Chapters, Dissertations ete. (N= 9) Childhood Sexual Assault (N=12) Acute Sexual Assault (N=7) Informal Support Provider Only (N=5) Screening (N=1) Full-text articles excluded (N=26) No Healthcare Provider (N=15) Childhood Sexual Assault (N=4) Mental Health Setting (N=4) Commentary, ete (N=2) Acute Sexual Assault (N=1) organized into themes, the most common of which are reported in the text. Results Characteristics of Included Articles The articles included in the review examined women’s experi- ences of delayed disclosure to a range of health-care providers. Health-care providers included physicians (Ahrens, Campbell, Ternier-Thames, Wasco, & Sefl, 2007; Diaz et al., 2004; Fili- pas & Ullman, 2001; Golding et al., 1989; Mazza, Dennerstein, & Ryan, 1996; Popiel & Susskind, 1985; Starzynski, Ullman, Filipas, & Townsend, 2005; Sturza & Campbell, 2005; Ullman, 3502-017 Page 3 of 15 EFTA_00001478 EFTA00156819

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

{panunuo2) @SOPSIP 02 ajquisojwor [29) JOAN atp djay pue asn.n pying o2 au ayEL qnesse jenxas ised & Jo aunsojasip syessayas Buypiaosg Auano2au YIM Wau 3S|SSE 01 |/GEPTEAE Sa2/AUas yO SAOAIAINS BuPWOJUY (awejq 02 5} wa, “B'3) qnesse jenxas inoge suondazuorsiu SujApuey> Ipye 02 suOAsaNb 32a.12U09 jo Salsas B 35—) dn-sojjoy aiejsdoudde ayp syaas soalasns Sujunsug saieag paup, quaWssasse BuUpNO, jo wed se sauuew aituo|ssedwios aad jeuorssayoud suepisdyg (pooz) VOREZIWHA 3NeSsE jeNxas INOgE Apr—a.Ip aajnbuj t uy Zupuodsas pur woddns jeuonows Supjaoug aaneIpUtNd “VaWiOMgp| = N [ev IQ soayuns at Sunzeasiq Jauuew aaneZau aUNsSOPSsIp aye t uy Sujpuodsas plore pur sauuew aajysod Auasayip soajauns aya Buprasy ssapiaoud saeag paxup © ul puodsay o1 Moy Inoge syap|Aoud aed Jo.nu0> Bupyey spoupaw Je21paw 2s8Ua5, (o10z) -\pjeay Zuipnpur saapoud asoddns pewsoy ures yp JONAsnS ay Bupweyg pax, “UaWOM EO! =N “ye 28 suauy ye 38 vORdeas OU Surry Bujaq-]a6 SAOAIAINS B42 JO} WBDU0D 40 Aipedwiss Aue avequnwiwo> 02 Buys ang ,gof sap, FujIoQ sourawap Payrerap/pyo> & Fuyuyraurepy saunpazoud ayrauy je2jpaw ou) suopsanb BUNSO|ISIP JBYE JOAAIN'S pre ajqiur Buppjroug Buyuaa.os ynesse jenxas Zupesodsosuy sapisuoz ain djay o2 Zunpou Fulog aoutunsseas Sulpinoid sareag pau, SJOAIAANS JOAUNS ap Bungnog "Ney sjaya OU sem IF WaLp Buyer “YOAMUNS aU spoupaw suepysdyg (z007) auoddns 02 Moy uo jauUOsvad je2;paw Urey JONAINS ay) Bupweyg 02 BupUaasy Zujpnul woddns peucnows Bupjaoug pax, “UaWwom7Zo, =N [e329 suauy uonzeay 2Waua20%9 ue SujAey us92U02 JO Ino Funrea st sapiaoud woddns ap sanaijaq AOAAns ayn Jf SUO|SPAP SAOAWAUNS at jo.aUO> o2 Zundwaly wuey BUNSOPISIP JBYT JOMAIN'S aumny wo.y watp a2a104d o7 BujA.n se asuodsas aun djay o2 Zunpou Fujog = sip paaasduaauy szonjasns UayM Ajuo jauuosuad JOAIAUNS ayp ZuypO.nUCD —-fEpaw wo.y suopovas Sunqnop soypue Supweyg Joaluns ap Sunzeasiq Pre ajqiduea Suppyaoug auNsOPsip aye |WE|q 02 I0U 5} JOAIAINS |Lp JEU saUTUNSSE suaplaoud sareag paxup Apuasayip Joajuns aya Zupeaay — put 'wsa2U02 pur aed Jo suo|ssaidxe ‘Bujuaasi spoipaw Je21paw IJ9uaD (6007) JOMAsNs ap Zungnop 40 Bupweyg = aanuoddns Sujpnpuy woddns jeuonowes Fujpjaoug pax, “UaWOM EO, =N je28 suauy SUOPEPUBULIOIIY sasuodsas jrydjayur sasuodsay jnjdjapy poweapy) swualdpay Anuno> paky aunsopsiq ara) ‘saouny sBurpuiy Aa pur sauedjnued “SaPRay Papn|ruy Jo voRdydsag "| aIqeL 3502-017 Page 4 of 15 EFTA_00001479 EFTA00156820

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

(panuauer) SJBYIOM S/SUD JdeI SE YINS SJOAIAINS JMesse [eENxaS YIM TupjOMm souaedxa 2aIp {pm asoin Aq pasn ssojeyaq uo surjaisdyd ures y sapmme aanviau sursdyd aSueys o2 suonuansaquy usisag sipAw ade, yo sazedwy aaneSau @Up PUE INESSE jenxas InOge ssapjAoud a4z> ~tpyeay Surpnpuy suapiroud woddns pewsoy a2e2npyZ S2UR/0]A saued axewWHUY 10} papuawwora. ypeoudde aya Zuysn ajnesse jenxas soy ssassy SBYSIA BYs y VORTUWEXE ay dois 03 JoAjAuns aya Moye pur VONTUWwEXD Buyanp ssoweyaq ssonjauns ay 02 aanisuas ag aunpazoud ayy ulejdxe pue uontupwexe ZuuNp 3IQUIOJWO? 1SOW 3g UTD BYS MOY JOAIAINS ay 4S swoos iuaned Uy ajqeieAt aynesse Jenxas INOGE speSIEW JaYIO JO SauNyr0Ig BATE Bums 3UO-U0-aU0 ‘artAd & Uy IINESSE [ENxas aup SsNISIQ ypeoidde aquaradwo> Ayesnajno pur peauaw%pniuou & asp) Ageaeiidoudde puodsas o1 ajqeun J ‘JONWUNS al YM xRads O2 asunU JayOUT puly BSO}25IP 02 JOAWAINS aL Ysnd 30U 0G ({suezaiaa “'a) auajolA jenxas paouajiadxa Bary 02 Ajax] Bue speNpIAIpUY Aue a4aym s8unias aue>-\ajeay ul Bupuaa.rs seynifas sapisuo> suoneulwexa Suunp sasuodsas SSB. [EQUaAUOU JO SsauaJEME pauaaysjay e BALEY JOAIAUNS |yp sn, 2OU OP pur IuaWUOJAUA |EAUAaPYUOD E aPIACIg aur? yo Anunuod pure aunsojsip safeunooua ap Aayes jo Buyjaay & put isn.o ysyqease djay o2 y>voudde pazaquas-quared & as-y SuOpEPUaWWIOI3y asnua Zunrjol,, (inpuny puy ssoajasns rey [ezaua’ ul ynesse jenxas inoge suawwo “ie) uop2ead annviau aauipuy ue Zujarpy soayuns aun Sunzensig Joavuns aya Sujweyg supAw ades Zunowo1g (wins “#a) Apuasayip soaaans aya Supeasy Appinb a2algns ap Bulfueyp Jo JoAIuns ap waa 22E1U0> ada Bulpioay Burdj yo soataans ap Bujsno2y 3} 404 pase, 40 2) parsasap Aap, JOaIAans aya Buyjpaa 40 .vase IeIp Ul, Zujop asam Aap ey Jonvuns aip Buppsy adwave2 YM JoalAans 3qp Zupeasy Jonwsns at) SumppsD sasuodsa. jnydjayury sBupurg Ay Apuasayip 2oaaans Sunea.a 10K) JONAINS 3up WA aoualJadxe UMO saya SueYys JOAIAANS 3tp ZupIeAsIp 10Ky @unsojasip aun Sujsatjaq 40 Sunepyey, auoddns jeuoneuopuy Suiproig pre ajqi8uea Sujprosg JOAAUNS aya Sue} IO-y aoddns jeuonows Zujprnoig papaau p sjeasayau Sunqeyy UONUOJUI IeYD aueYs 02 BARIG AIBA BUT OA, pur _jinjdjay aew sep, {2] Inoge auoduT 02 uaxods vara Nod aary, .juaddey 1 pip UayAA, “nod 03 pauaddey aeyp Awsos os w,), se ypns suonsanb pur Suawaims y8no.up aunsopsip aun Su3paynoupy aue2 aanuoddns Ayeuonows pur azeuorssedwo> Sujpuoig asidesaypoypisd 40 JOJASUNOD © SE aAsaS 02 SUndWwant InowIM asoddns Surpiroud ‘saaunosay AunWWwO> pure Adevaipoypdsd 02 soajauns Suluayay nod 02 pauaddey sey siya aeun Ausos OS We |, 2UaWaITIs ajdurs ay Bursn woddns Jeucnows 3uppiaoad put aunsopsip aya Funepye,, sasuodsau inydiaH aanTIAUENO aantaAUENO SAREE aamaeayend powpayy pay surjaishug “vaw pur UBWOM Jp = N surjaishug “URWOM E7E = N SasanN “UBWOM Ep = N asidwayy reaisdud “URWIOM | = N nuadpay aunsopsig pur swuedjnied sareas paaun (6861) ‘ye Fupjoy saneag paxuy) (1o0z) uRWIN pur sedipy saaeg parun sareag pau {z102) nols pure Aarajung Anune> “wea, “saoipny (panuauos) "| arqey 3502-017 Page 5 of 15 EFTA_00001480 EFTA00156821

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

(panuqua2) JOaIAaNS atp 3upzeasiq SasunN soayuns aun Sup zensiq aunany ayp Uy yNesse suaquiaw JOAININS JENXaS PIOAE 02 MOY UO VORTULIOZU! SuIPIAoIg Aunwwo> an BuneSaudas so Bupioay B2uras|sse sos’! JOAIAUNS BU BWIEYS JO apeusap Je2ypaw 410 peFay yeas O12 JOAIAuNs Bulsapy = N ‘SaSuNy ByueZUEL anesse jenxas 02 Sujpuodsay uo suaplaoud aut? 02 1UeaW NUaWaIEIS ZuIsc) uoneWwogu} spoyaw be =N (6007) -tpyeay Suipnpuy suapiroud woddns pewsoj aae2npz JOAINUNS ay FujWeg Buydoo pur woddns jeuonowsa Zupiroig paxyy "UaWOM OS = N yeaa murinyy syeuuajas aveudoudde ayew 02 Japso ul suondo [edaj put sarnsas [eNOS [eI] Jo aBpajmouy aAtEY surjaskug tyeasny Jesse jenxas asouseyp 02 sys aya dojanaq “UaWOM (9661) qnesse penxes yo sworduids pur suis 40} ssassy aaneanuend grt =N ye ie ezzey sareas paun aanzoddns suapiaoud (z007) St SUOpot INA sanja2uad JOAAINS ap Te #PaYD EIpaw W19uaD —pjsudzmg pue SJOAJAINS 02 Be Fupyroud “URWIOM ‘uostLy “u07 UaYM UONTUALO [eNxaS JO SaNss| O1 aANIsUAS ag aantapuend 701 =N “ueWII-) ‘Bu07 asopsip o2 SJOa|AunS ZuiFesnozua Yay LOANED WIM paaro1g suonovad aunsopsip aant¥au yaya Jo.nu0> Supe, Budo> pur Sujpurssepun yam ssonasns isis soayuns aun Sup zeasiq saouaiedxa Apuasayip soaaans aya Sujeasy suapiaoid saieag paul aunsopsip ised s41oAAuns Inoge aunbuy JOAIAINS JE=paw B3439Uaq) (o10z) sysomiau Loddns [epos s,4on|Auns jo inSuaas ssassy atp Suzpew3ps so Bujweyg BANTIAUENO “UaWwOM ZIT =N vow ynesse jenxes Zupea.n uo wadin> daay oa suapiaoad aut Arewiud 10) Uoatonpa Suosu0 apUcg (suonoras Jpewos “UONtaP! [EP/HWOY PUT [EPIIINS ‘saAINIYP JOWARYaY JO1OW “seIqoud “sanjnayip diysuonrjau ‘WIaaISS-}[9S U) SaSeaJDap “BWEIG-sa5 ‘aanadde uy sastauzap ‘aourqunasip daays “#a) ajnesse yenxas jo swoidwis pure suis 02 wae ag Spsom SWANS JEIRUES Padua Ladxe acy svayIO TeLp UMO SJOAIAINS BUA UY INESSE [ENxas 2UaLUNIDG mou warp Zune] Aq uopeUUOJU} ZuISoPsIp UI JYNESsE Bip 4OJ PAW} aq 01 5} 2UEWESsE aL e~ OWO? asOW squaned MO}fE O12 484291992), UE ASP) SMOUY JOAIAINS BUI IYI JEA]> 5} 3) |QUN INessE quawssasse aupNos Jenxas ay Sujpunouins uaa aya Zupunovay jo aed se Bujusasos a2uaoya penxes I2NpUOD syessajas saeudoudde Sujpuosg JNESSE [eNxaS BSOpISIP Aeucnows pur AyerpsAyd waog “ayes Suyysyqeasy sa28IS paxur Ajpe2newoane jj) JOAAANS atp IeYyD awNsse OU OG Avayes yo Mayans (sooz) BUNSOPSIP 01 BA)INPUOD 5] JEU IUAWUOIAUA UT BED Zuyjaay € “aoutanzanu uoddns jeuonows Zujprroig = 9unaes80-] S3SJNN WIN Buss] SUOREPUaWIWO2I3y sasuodsas jnydjayur) sasuodsas inydjay porpapy nuadpay Anuno> pay aunsopsiq “ura, “suowpny sBupuig Ay pur squedjnueg (penuauo) "| aqey 3502-017 Page 6 of 15 EFTA_00001481 EFTA00156822

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

(panuauo2) aunsoj2s|p 02 suonzea4 aantiau ssay put aanisod asow apioig .supdw adea, a2alaa pur jo aueme ag SyP{S VORED]UNWOD a2UEYUa 01 AJUNWAUOD /E2;PAW aya Or BuyUFEIA apIAoIg omaau Toddns say anoge JOAMUNs aIp ~SW @™ padoo aney Aew ays yy ul saposida YNWIP 4aypO saquIaWA 02 AOAVUNS aI ¥SY Jen2tud pur ‘pasnro} ‘yaj4q 5] EY BIIAPE aPIADIg 4nesse penxes jo sworduds jeuonowa pur yeajsdyd ayp anoge voalasns aup aze2npy Ayes ssoawuns ssassy SUOARYaq [equaauou pur [eqJaA SJOAJAUNS O1 BANIsUaS ag 20u Op YM asoKp WO.y [Rauaya4 Paau OYA SJOAIAUNS aIEDUaIAACG pasnbas ‘uyasuno? pure qoddns jo aaulap aip ssassy aunsojasip aZeuno2ua o2 uado pur spedwe ag ynesse Jenx’s WaIM ado> suOA|AUNS MOY PUEISVepUL) BURP BANISUTS BJOW BPIAOIg SIPS UOREIUNWWOD pure Sujse> axoudwu) o2 svapiaoud aueo-yayeay ures y sUOpePUaWOIaY aynesse jenxas ayn anoge Supyey. JOAIAINS Bp JOY SUOIS|DaP TuPyepy JONIAUNS aya 40y Assos Bulppay aaeudoudde ay [euuayau & Buppiaoud 10~y Joalaans aya Buyssjwisig, Jouve reuoyssajoudun ue ul Supsy sasuodsa. prydjayupy |BDURIS|SSE JBYLIN) YaVS O2 VOAIAANS au SujSesnodug suondo Surssnosip pure vonewoyuy Sujpwrosg yinoap Bujod sy sOAUNs ay ey PURISVapUN O2 BUI JOAIAINS BUA YIM 4Ie1 On BU Fup Joaiains ap Bujunsseay JNeSse jeNx|s Bp 40} ajqisuodsa, OU pur aUA> BJO WIIDIA © SEM JOAN atp Ie SuPsopUjaY yeuuiou due suOnIeas SsOAUNS aA IeULp SuZiseyduy (Avpoa aw wai siup aueys 02 paplrap NO prj wy “ayl] UNOA UE IUAAa SR WAM [Rap O2 LpZua.ns JO [bap reauT & 4003 3), “Fa) syppjs Budo> pur sipSuaas s.sonjasns BuSpayaouyse pur SuAynuap] suawnues aandeprjew ssaudxa oym 4O/pur ‘uontapy [eprins ‘swajqoud asn aoueasgqns ‘sdiysuoneyas ype ym sapindypp ZuyoSuo ‘asnge yo Asonsyy @ aAky OYM S4OAIAUNS 02 SpRLIAaU TupIAO.g Jay 02 |PqeyeAe swaasks Toddns Que avaya aeyp pur Asano>au say jo aiury> Uy 5} @Ys ILD PUTISJapUN O2 JOAN ap BuASISSy 4onains aip Suauoddns put o2 Sujuaas!7 PaIe]OS} OU 5} JOINS ay IeLp BuAgUaA, aUNSOPSIp Jaye sup anoge BW pjor NOs pes w,), pur nod o2 pauaddey sey sip Awos Os wi, st yons uawarels ajdus Fuse) aarudoidde sem asopsip 02 VOISPAP aLp IeLp JoAJAJNS au BuNsseay yynesse jenxas ap Sulpaynouyry Suyqeay ZuBesnooua pur woddns Zujpuoug sasuodsas [nydja}y sBupury hay surj>|shug sareag paup “URWON (sooz) aaneanuend +801 =N e328 pysudzaes sareag peur) (sa61) suriaishyg Pupyssns BanTIAUENd = “UaWOM ST = N pur jaidog aonoed SBAIMPIW-3SUNN sareag paup rewy> “VIN ($661) oquinig pyuezuey Suaprrosd (1100) JE"paW 2"49UaD uyppw squoddns |e)205 pur ‘owaxy OZ =N ‘wonshn, BanEeNd ‘vaWwoMO| = N uring poupapy suaiday Anuno> pdky aunsopsiq sea) “ssouINYy pur suedonuieg (panupuos) *| arqee 3502-017 Page 7 of 15 EFTA_00001482 EFTA00156823

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Atm aanzaye pur jrydjay © ul ssoajauns laoddns ©] MOY UO sJapiAoud aued-inyeay Sulpnj>uy suapiaoud oddns peUioy 20} SUONUBAISIU] APIA sasuodsas Sunweyq wayp aonpa. pue 2upedwa aiow aq o2 Way2 diay 02 2INBSSE [ENXas JO sanIyea ayp UO suap|Aoud aueD -yajeay Burpnpur suaprroad asoddns jewsoy ures | SUOAIAANS O12 SUONIeas aANtFau UOWWOD puE JINESSe jeENxXas INOgE sjeUO|ssajoud jeHpaw UTI SJOAAINS 02 SUOAIEAI Jauvossad |e2ypaw aAosdw) 02 UONEINpa apinoig BUNSOpSsIp 02 suonztas aant¥au ssa] pur aanisod asow apinoig SOAS [EDOS pur yaeEaY Jeuaw 02 aitjdoudde auaym suonwmns sayay suondo quawata.n ajdaynw anoge VOREWIOJUS IAIM aut? anrsuodsa BJO apIAoJg aunsojasip o2 Ajaaeudoudde puodsay 02 Moy UO sasinu put sutiaisdyd ures yp BSOjISIP 02 UBLIOM 40} sarzd ayes aue saziyo suemrsdyd aunsug SuOpEpUaWLUOI9y pre aiqisuea Buiprroug JNesse penxes sup anoge Supyea wo. wap SuBesnorsip 40 soajauns aun Zunzensig Apuasayip soaaans aya Supeasy Joavuns aya Suweyg jo.uquo> Supe Bupypea wo. JOAlAuns ap SuFeunoss\pBuprensig Apuaayip paiva.n Sug JOAIUNS aya FurWENg (a2euo> ada Bupuyeauyew 10U) JOAIAUNS ay Woy AeMeE FuPjoo7 UORe2|pew UeLA JXpO Nese penxas ain waIM Fuyeap 404 suondo sayp0 Fuypiaoud 10~N) SuNsOpsip ap Jaye aqeausopwooun Suuraddy aunsopsip vodn quays Jo pjoo Bujag BUNSOPSIP 5,JOAUNS aya Suoud) 40 Zuysspusig suonsanb 4aqyainy Bupyst Jo anesse penxas ap Buj8pajmouyze now uondyosaid & soaauns aya Bu) sasuodsa. pnydjayupy JOAIAINS aya 02 SujysIsr] JOnns ap Sualeg aunsopsip aya Tunepyea, aoddns jeuonows Zujpirnoig woddns jeuopewsoguipre ayqiZuea Zujpuosg JOAIAINS |y2 BuWeEG ION JOAIAUNS aya O27 Sujusas!] uonepyea Sulproig auoddns jevonows Sujprnosg aoddns vopewsoguypre ayqi3uea Zujproig sasuodsay jnydjay sBuypury day aanTIAUENO aantapUENO aantinuENo BantAUENo aantapUENO spoyaw powpayy pad “Iquaydde JOU = Wyn “SION surjaishug “URWOM $5] =N suapiaoud JE#paw "13Ua5 “UBWOM 696 = N sury2iskud “URWOM ETE = N suryaskug “"URWOM SS] = N surjaishug “URWOM $5] = N suejaishug “URWOM ph = N nuadpay aunsopsiq pur swuedpnueg SaIeIg paaup) (s661) pias pure uewyipy) saneag paxun) (e002) pasmopleNy pur uewyij saaeas pau (1007) sedipy pue URLUII-) saatag palun (99661) uewiIn saneag paxuy) (9661) uewin saaeag pau (sooz) weqdwed pur ezanag Anuno> ‘yea “suoyny (panuauo) "| ayqey 3502-017 Page 8 of 15 EFTA_00001483 EFTA00156824

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Lanthier et al. 1996a, 1996b; Ullman & Filipas, 2001; Ullman & Siegel, 1995), nurses (Esposito, 2006; Lessing, 2005; Muganyizi et al, 2009), nurse-midwives (Plumbo, 1995), and physical therapists (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012). In six articles, the gen- eric terms “medical personnel,” “medical staff.” or “health- care system" were used by the authors without specifying the type of provider (Ahrens, Cabral, & Abeling, 2009; Ahrens et al., 2010; Littleton, 2010; Long, Ullman, Long, Mason, & Starzynski, 2007; Muganyizi, Nystrom, Axemo, & Emmelin, 2011; Ullman & Najdowski, 2009). The articles varied widely in terms of their approach. Of the 23 articles, there were 21 empirical studies, | literature review, and | clinical practice. The empirical studies included quanti- tative methodologies (Diaz et al., 2004; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Golding et al., 1989; Littleton, 2010; Long et al., 2007; Mazza et al., 1996; Popiel & Susskind, 1985; Starzynski et al., 2005; Ullman, 1996a, 1996b; Ullman & Filipas, 2001; Ullman & Nadjowski, 2009; Ullman & Siegel, 1995), qualitative meth- odologies (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Esposito, 2006; Muga- nyizi et al., 2011), and mixed methods designs (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007; Ahrens et al., 2010; Muganyizi et al., 2009; Sturza & Campbell, 2005). In all, 19 articles were U.S.- based, 2 were from Tanzania, and | from Australia. The number of participants in the empirical studies ranged from | to 43 in the qualitative studies and up to 2,181 in the quantitative studies. In all, 13 studies utilized the Social Reac- tions Questionnaire, a self-report instrument developed by Ullman (1996, 2000) from earlier research on social support and social reactions received by sexual assault survivors upon disclosure (Ullman, 2000). The instrument consists of 48 items that are characterized as either positive reactions or negative reactions to disclosure. Positive reactions fall into 2 categories including “emotional support/belief™ and “tangible aid/infor- mation support,” whereas negative reactions fall into five cate- gories including ‘“‘victim blame,” “treat differently,” “distraction,” “take control,” and “egocentric.” Disclosure to Health-Care Providers Eight empirical studies specified the precise proportion of sur- vivors in their sample who disclosed to a health-care provider. Disclosure rates among sexual assault survivors to health-care providers in these studies were 6% (Golding et al., 1989), 9% (Mazza et al., 1996), 10% (Ahrens et al., 2009), 11% (Littleton, 2010), 17% (Starzynski et al., 2005), 19% (Ulman & Siegel, 1995), and 27% (Filipas & Ullman, 2001). One study, Ahrens, Campbell, Ternier-Thames, Wasco, and Sefl (2007), found that only 5% of women chose their doctor as the first person to whom to disclose. Two empirical studies provided reasons why survivors chose to disclose to a health-care provider. In Ahrens et al. (2007), some survivors indicated that they disclosed for medical reassurance. As one woman who disclosed to her physician stated, “I wanted information, to know that I was physically and emotionally all right" (Ahrens et al. 2007, p. 41). In Sturza and Campbell (2005), women also disclosed to their physician to access medication to deal with the sexual assault. Three empirical studies indicated reasons why women chose not to disclose having been sexually assaulted to a physician. Mazza, Dennerstein, and Ryan (1996) found that 53% of the women in their study had not disclosed to their physician because they did not think it relevant to their consultation. Additional reasons for not disclosing sexual assault included that their physician did not ask (27%), embarrassment (10%), and lack of trust in their physician (1%; Mazza et al., 1996). Ullman (1996b), as well as Sturza and Campbell (2005), further suggested that survivors’ fear of their physicians’ response to the disclosure was an important factor in influencing their decision to not disclose. Golding, Siegel, Sorenson, Burnam, and Stein (1989) found that 26% of survivors who experienced a stranger sexual assault told their physician, as opposed to only 5% of those who experienced an acquaintance sexual assault. Survivors were more likely to tell their physician if the sexual assault involved penetration, physical or psychological threats, or if they identified having experienced emotional consequences (Golding et al., 1989). Helpful Responses to Disclosure The most common helpful responses from formal support pro- viders including health-care providers among the 13 articles that provided data were validating the disclosure and providing emotional support, and providing tangible aid. Validating the disclosure and providing emotional support. Five arti- cles indicated that having the provider acknowledge or validate the disclosure was a positive response from formal support providers generally (Ullman, 1996b) and health-care providers specifically (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Esposito, 2006; Plumbo, 1995; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). Acknowledging or validating the disclosure was described as including simple statements such as “I'm so sorry that this has happened to you” and “I'm glad you told me about this” (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012, p. 346; Esposito, 2006, p. 76; Plumbo, 1995, p. 425). Twelve articles indicated that receiving emotional support from formal support providers including health-care providers was a positive response to disclosure (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007; Diaz et al., 2004; Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Esposito, 2006; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Lessing, 2005; Muganyizi et al., 2009; Plumbo, 1995; Popiel & Sus- skind, 1985; Ullman, 1996b; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). Ahrens, Cabral, and Abeling (2009) found that “emotional support from medical staff was almost always considered healing” for survivors (p. 87). Emotional support included the health-care provider show- ing compassion for the survivor or providing nurturance (Espo- sito, 2006; Lessing, 2005), being empathic (Ahrens et al, 2007; Plumbo, 1995; Popiel & Susskind, 1985), listening in an active and supportive manner (Ahrens et al., 2009; Plumbo, 1995; Ullman, 1996b; Ullman & Siegel, 1995), and acknowledging 3502-017 Page 9 of 15 EFTA_00001484 EFTA00156825

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

10 the survivor's skills in dealing with the sexual assault (Plumbo, 1995). Telling survivors that they were not to blame for the sexual assault also was considered a key component of emo- tional support (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007; Diaz et al., 2004; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Lessing, 2005; Plumbo, 1995; Ullman, 1996b). In a study conducted by Ullman (1996b), 10% of women cited not being blamed as the most helpful response they received from a formal support provider, including health-care providers. Providing tangible aid. Twelve articles indicated that “tangible aid” was a helpful response to disclosure from formal sources of support, including health-care providers (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007; Diaz et al., 2004; Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012, Esposito, 2006; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Lessing, 2005; Muganyizi et al., 2009; Plumbo, 1995; Popiel & Sus- skind, 1985; Ullman, 1996b; Ullman & Najdowski, 2009). Tangible aid is described by Ullman (2000) not only as assist- ing the survivor to access medical care, providing them with resources, particularly those that focus on coping with the after- math of sexual assault, and encouraging them to see a counse- lor or other mental health professional, but also encompassed clarifying misconceptions about sexual assault and assessing safety (e.g., Diaz et al., 2004). Although across the articles, tangible aid was typically described as helpful and in some cases “healing” (Ahrens et al., 2009), Ahrens, Cabral, and Abeling (2009) found that survivors could interpret tangible aid from formal support pro- viders (in this case legal workers) negatively if the tangible aid was not accompanied by validation or support. In another study, receiving tangible aid from formal support providers was associated with poorer health outcomes for survivors who had experienced a severe sexual assault (Ullman & Siegel, 1995). Ullman and Siegel (1995) suggested that this may have been because survivors who have experienced severe sexual assaults are more likely to seek tangible aid from formal support pro- viders such as physicians or the police, who have been shown to react more negatively than other support providers. Unhelpful Responses to Disclosure The most common unhelpful responses from formal support providers including health-care providers among the 13 articles that provided data were blaming the survivor; minimizing, dis- missing, and/or distracting responses; treating the survivor dif- ferently after disclosure; displaying a cold and/or detached demeanor; and doubting the survivor. Blaming survivor for sexual assault. Identified in 10 articles, being blamed for the sexual assault was the most commonly cited unhelpful response from formal support providers, including health-care providers (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007; Ahrens et al., 2010; Esposito, 2006; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Lessing, 2005; Littleton, 2010; Muganyizi et al., 2009; Ullman, 1996b; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). TRAUMA, VIOLENCE, & ABUSE Although blaming responses were generally experienced negatively, two empirical studies found that such reactions from medical staff and other support providers’ could be inter- preted positively if the survivor felt that the intention was to help them prevent another sexual assault from occurring (Ahrens et al, 2009; Muganyizi et al., 2009). For example, Ahrens et al. (2009) reported that while blaming responses were often considered hurtful by survivors when coming from informal support providers, they were often considered healing when coming from medical personnel if they believed that the provider was trying to help them avoid an assault in the future. Minimizing, dismissing, and/or distracting responses. In nine arti- cles that indicated negative responses to disclosure, minimizing and/or dismissing the sexual assault was cited as unhelpful (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2010; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Littleton, 2010; Muganyizi et al., 2009; Plumbo, 1995; Sturza & Campbell, 2005; Ullman, 1996b; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). Minimizing and dismissive responses included state- ments or attempts to make the sexual assault seem less trou- bling than how the survivor perceived it, or suggesting to her that it was “not a big deal” or that she “stay silent.” Ahrens etal. (2009) found that such statements were taken by survivors to mean that the support provider did not care about them or about what had happened to them. Three articles also noted that attempts by support providers, including health-care providers, to distract the survivor were considered unhelpful even when they were meant to be of assistance (Ahrens et al., 2007; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Ull- man, 1996b). In one study, the results were mixed; Muganyizi et al. (2009) reported that half their sample of sexual assault survivors found distraction attempts to be helpful, whereas the other half described them as unhelpful. Distracting responses from support providers, including health-care providers, encompassed telling the survivor to stop talking or thinking about the sexual assault or attempting to discourage them from further speaking about the sexual assault (Ullman, 1996b). Treating survivor differently after disclosure. Eight articles indi- cated that being treated differently by the support provider after the disclosure is unhelpful to survivors (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2010; Esposito, 2006; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Muganyizi et al., 2009; Popiel & Susskind, 1985; Ullman, 1996b; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). In fact, Ahrens et al. (2009) found that every survivor in their sample who had disclosed having been sexually assaulted described being treated differently post-disclosure and that this was hurtful. Being treated differently after the disclosure included treating the survivor with contempt (Esposito, 2006; Muganyizi et al., 2009), feeling sorry for the survivor (Popiel & Susskind, 1985), and avoiding or segregating the survivor (Muganyizi et al., 2009). Ullman (1996b) found that physicians or police were more likely to treat a survivor differently after disclosure than either an informal support provider or a mental health professional. 3502-017 Page 10 of 15 EFTA_00001485 EFTA00156826

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Lanthier et al. Displaying a cold andlor detached demeanor. Five articles sug- gested that it was unhelpful to survivors when formal support providers, including health-care providers, displayed a cold and/or detached demeanor (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007; Esposito, 2006; Plumbo, 1995; Sturza & Campbell, 2005), even when they “did their job” by providing the nec- essary information and/or aid (Ahrens et al., 2007). A cold and detached demeanor included such reactions as not making eye contact with the survivor or asking another question unrelated to the sexual assault in an effort to change the subject (Espo- sito, 2006; Sturza & Campbell, 2005), ignoring the survivor (Sturza & Campbell, 2005), not providing any emotional assistance upon hearing the disclosure (Ahrens et al., 2009; Plumbo, 1995), and having no reaction at all (Ahrens et al_, 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007). For example, in the Ahrens et al. (2007) study, a survivor relayed that when she told her phy- sician that she was sexually assaulted by her husband, “he didn’t seem surprised ... he didn’t really seem to give any reaction at all” (p. 43). An article by Sturza and Campbell (2005) reported that many women described their physicians as “cold” or “silent” upon disclosure and felt silenced when these physicians “got out their pad” to write a prescription as the sole response to the disclosure (Sturza & Campbell, 2005, p. 361). Half the women in their sample using medications acquired them with a pre- scription given as a means of dealing with the sexual assault. Doubting the survivor. Three articles demonstrated that doubting the survivor's account of the sexual assault (Ahrens et al_, 2009; Ahrens et al., 2007), or accusing the survivor of not telling the truth (Esposito, 2006), constituted unhelpful responses. In particular, Ahrens et al. (2007) described sup- port providers including health-care providers, who ques- tioned the accuracy of the survivors’ account of the sexual assault or suggested that the sexual assault did not qualify as a “real” rape. Recommendations for Health-Care Providers The most common recommendations extracted from the arti- cles focused on improving formal support providers’ including health-care providers’ responses to sexual assault disclosure were prompt for disclosure, recognize indicators, create an environment supportive of disclosure, use a patient-centered and culturally competent approach, and enhance training. Prompt for disclosure. Four articles recommended direct inquiry of all women for sexual assault as part of routine assessment (Ahrens et al., 2007; Diaz et al., 2004; Esposito, 2006; Lessing, 2005), with an additional study advocating for screening in settings with large numbers of potential victims of physical and psychological trauma (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012). Espo- sito (2006) suggested that when taking a sexual assault history as part of a routine assessment it is best to start the discussion by asking: “Has anyone ever touched you, or forced you to do something sexual that you did not want to do?” (p. 73). When treating adolescents, specifically, Diaz et al. (2004) recom- mended that the health-care provider use a series of questions, rather than just one. Lessing (2005) cautioned that the health-care provider should not assume that the survivor will automatically disclose information about the sexual assault, whereas Esposito (2006) suggested “it would be inappropriate or even harmful to push someone to disclose” (p. 71). Recognize indicators. Five articles suggested that it was impor- tant for health-care providers to be aware of the signs and symptoms of sexual assault (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Espo- sito, 2006; Lessing, 2005; Mazza et al., 1996; Plumbo, 1995). Two articles indicated that the health-care provider should be alert to signs and symptoms of distress or anxiety during rou- tine examinations, particularly those that can be considered invasive such as a Pap test (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Espo- sito, 2006). Esposito (2006) further suggested that during rou- tine examinations, the health-care provider should explain the procedure to the woman, be sensitive to any behaviors that indicate that she is feeling distress, and allow her to stop the examination if she appears to require a rest. Create an environment to support disclosure. The importance of being able to speak with the survivor in a private, safe, and supportive environment and “not rushing” them was indicated by the authors of five articles as particularly important in assist- ing survivors to disclose (Diaz et al., 2004; Dunleavy & Slo- wik, 2012; Esposito, 2006; Lessing, 2005; Sturza & Campbell, 2005). Diaz et al. (2004) suggested that having the time to help the survivor feel comfortable and build trust with the provider may also encourage disclosure. In addition, Esposito (2006) recommended having brochures or other media in examination rooms outlining information about sexual assault and the local services available to survivors. Use a patient-centered and culturally competent approach. Three articles recommended the use of a patient-centered and/or cul- turally competent approach when responding to delayed dis- closure of sexual assault in health-care settings (Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Esposito, 2006; Long et al., 2007). Dunleavy and Slowik (2012) understood a patient-centered approach to include viewing the patient as an active participant in their own care with the health-care provider listening and learning from the patient about how their needs can best be met. Esposito (2006) further recommended that the health-care provider use a “culturally competent” approach when supporting a survivor after disclosure. Though not defined by Esposito, a culturally competent approach is described elsewhere as taking into account individual differences such as age, race, gender, socio- economic status, and sexual orientation when discussing a trau- matic event with a survivor (Roberts, Watlington, Nett, & Batten, 2010). A culturally competent health-care provider is sensitive to potential power differences between themselves and the survivor and shows a general level of sensitivity to diverse communities (Long et al., 2007; Roberts et al., 2010). 3502-017 Page 11 of 15 EFTA_00001486 EFTA00156827

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

12 Enhance training. The authors of 11 articles suggested that for- mal support providers including health-care providers require (further) training on how to sensitively respond to disclosures of past sexual assault (Ahrens et al., 2007; Ahrens et al, 2010; Filipas & Ullman, 2001; Golding et al., 1989; Muganyizi et al., 2009; Muganyizi et al., 2011; Popiel & Susskind, 1985; Sturza & Campbell, 2005; Ullman, 1996a; Ullman & Filipas, 2001; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). Ahrens, Stansell, and Jennings (2010) suggested that formal support providers including health-care providers require train- ing focused on minimizing negative and increasing positive social reactions. Starzynski, Ullman, Filipas, and Townsend (2005) recommended that becoming aware of rape myths will help formal support providers including health-care providers move beyond the notion that the only “real” sexual assaults are those committed by strangers (Baker et al., 2012). Learning about the realities of sexual assault was also emphasized by Ullman and Filipas (2001) who suggested this may assist in reducing blaming responses. Finally, Golding et al. (1989) put forward that it may be useful for health-care providers to leam helping behaviors used by those with direct experience work- ing with sexual assault survivors such as rape crisis workers. Discussion Although the research focused on delayed disclosure in health- care settings is sparse, the evidence thus far suggests that health-care providers respond both appropriately and inappro- priately to survivors’ disclosures of past sexual assault. There appears to be a general consensus about what constitutes an appropriate response to the delayed disclosure of sexual assault. Twelve of the 13 articles that included an examination of appropriate responses to delayed disclosure found the pro- vision of emotional support to be helpful. The evidence for the provision of tangible aid/informational support (e.g., referrals) was slightly more nuanced, with one study indicating that tan- gible aid was not helpful in the absence of emotional support. Unhelpful responses were most commonly associated with health-care provider “unprofessionalism” (Muganyizi et al., 2011), with blaming the survivor most frequently cited. Few articles examined delayed disclosure in health-care set- tings as their primary objective. Only 6 of the 23 articles focused exclusively on health-care settings (Diaz et al., 2004; Dunleavy & Slowik, 2012; Esposito, 2006; Lessing, 2005: Mazza et al., 1996; Plumbo, 1995) and named the practicing health-care provider (i-e., nurse, nurse-midwife, physician, physical therapist). Of these six articles, one was a literature review, one was a clinical practice, and two of the remaining four articles were studies with relatively small sample sizes. In the 17 articles that did not focus exclusively on health-care settings, 11 identified the health-care provider, whereas the remaining 6 employed general terms such as “medical person- nel” and “medical staff (Ahrens et al., 2009; Ahrens, et al, 2010; Littleton, 2010; Long, et al., 2007; Muganyizi et al., 2011; Ullman & Najdowski, 2009). Further, some studies col- lapsed health-care providers with other formal support TRAUMA, VIOLENCE, & ABUSE providers, making it unclear if the results would have differed had these support providers been analyzed separately. For example, in one study that reported the proportion of survivors who disclosed to physicians, the remainder of the analyses considered physicians along with a number of other formal support providers as “other.” Future research in the area should include specific and detailed information about the recipients of a disclosure, including profession (e.g., family physicians) as it is possible that some health professions provide more helpful responses than others. It is also possible that certain responses may be considered helpful from one type of health-care provider, but not another. There is some basis for this, with Ahrens et al. (2009) finding that the same reaction may be viewed differ- ently depending on who the support provider is (e.g., infor- mal vs. formal, legal vs. medical). Additionally, little is known about the specific characteristics of survivors who have disclosed past sexual assault (e.g., race, sexual orienta- tion, socioeconomic status, immigration status, lifestyle) and how these characteristics may impact the health-care provi- ders’ response. The recommendation in four articles to inquire about sexual assault with every adolescent and adult woman as part of rou- tine practice (Ahrens et al., 2007; Esposito, 2006; Diaz et al., 2004; Lessing, 2005) has also been made by Probst, Turchik, Zimak, and Huckins (2011). Although not much is known about the impact of routine screening for sexual assault, within the context of intimate partner violence, some research has shown there to be challenges and questionable benefit (Klevens et al., 2012; MacMillan et al., 2009; Wathen & MacMillan, 2012). This had led to some experts advising “a case-finding approach to partner violence identification” (Wathen & Mac- Millan, 2012, p. 712). Research focused on routine screening for sexual assault is required. Until we have such evidence, a similar case finding approach which prompts for disclosure in the presence of signs and symptoms of sexual assault, may be appropriate. There are limitations that temper the strength of these find- ings. Of the 23 articles, the findings of 4 empirical studies appear to be based on data drawn from the same sample pop- ulation (Ahrens et al., 2009, Ahrens et al., 2007, Ahrens et al., 2010; Sturza & Campbell, 2005). Similarly, three other studies appear to draw on the same data set (Ullman, 1996a, 1996b; Ullman & Siegel, 1995). This effectively limited the number of distinct women's perspectives included in this systematic review. To draw stronger conclusions about helpful and unhelpful responses to disclosure, research with more (and more diverse) groups of women is required. Finally, six studies that met inclusion criteria focused primarily on outcomes that were not associated with positive or negative responses from health-care providers (Golding et al., 1989; Long et al., 2007; Mazza et al., 1996; Starzynski et al., 2005; Ullman, 1996a; Ullman & Filipas, 2001). The review itself may be limited by the search terms we used as well as the way in which the search terms were com- bined. In addition, we restricted our search to four databases, 3502-017 Page 12 of 15 EFTA_00001487 EFTA00156828

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Lanthier et al. which raises the possibility that articles not included in the chosen databases could have been missed. However, to assist with minimizing this risk, we searched the reference lists of key articles. We also included only scholarly articles published after 1985 and only those articles which were written in the English language. Finally, we included some studies that did not differentiate between those who disclosed sexual assault immediately and those who delayed disclosure. Conclusion Health-care providers are uniquely positioned to assist ado- lescent and adult women survivors of past sexual assault by providing relevant health care and acting as an important gateway to other support services. As inappropriate or nega- live responses such as blaming can lead to secondary victimi- zation, it is important that health-care providers are able to respond to survivors appropriately by validating the disclo- sure and providing emotional support and tangible aid. There is strong agreement that to improve practice in this area, health-care providers need enhanced training on how to create an environment that supports disclosure, including use of a patient-centered and culturally competent approach and, fur- ther, recognition of indicators of sexual assault when disclo- sure is not forthcoming. Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research Practice e Enhance training for health-care providers on (a) creat- ing an environment that supports disclosure; (b) using a patient centered and culturally competent approach; and (c) recognizing indicators of past sexual assault. e Respond to disclosures of past sexual assault with vali- dation, emotional support, medical care, information, and referral. e Include the care of sexual assault survivors in health- care professional practice guidelines. e Develop policies to ensure that health-care settings are conducive to disclosure of sexual assault. Research e Examine how characteristics such as gender, race, sex- ual orientation, socioeconomic status, immigration sta- tus, lifestyle, and assault characteristics impact the responses the survivor receives upon disclosure to a health-care provider. e Research routine screening for sexual assault to deter- mine its impact on diverse survivors. Acknowledgment The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of medical librarian Mona Frantzke, BSc, MLSc, from the Health Sciences Library at Women’s College Hospital. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. Du Mont is supported in part by the Atkinson Foundation. References Ahrens, C. E., Cabral, G.. & Abeling, S. (2009). Healing or hurtful: Sexual assault survivors’ interpretations of social reactions from support providers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 81-94. Ahrens, C. E., Campbell, R., Ternicr-Thames, N. K., Wasco, S., & Sefl, T. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quar- terly, 31, 38-49. Ahrens, C. E., Stansell, J., & Jennings, A. (2010). To tell or not to tell: The impact of disclosure on sexual assault survivors’ recovery. Violence and Victims, 25, 631-648. Baker, L. L.. Campbell, M., & Straatman, A. L. (2012). Overcoming barriers and enhancing supportive responses: The research on sexual violence against women. Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women and Children, Westem University. Retrieved from https/www-vawlearningnetwork.ca/sites/leamingtoendabuse.ca.vaw Iearningnetwork/files/LN_Overcoming_Barricrs_FINAL.pdf Borja, S. E., Callahan, J. L., & Long, P_ J. (2006). Positive and neg- ative adjustment and social support of sexual assault survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 905-914. Cahill, A. (2009). Sexual violence and objectification. In R. J. Herbele & V. Grace (Eds.), Theorizing sexual violence (pp. 14-30). New York, NY: Routledge. Diaz, A., Edwards, S., Neal, W_ P., Ludmer, P.. Sondike, S. B., Kess- ler, C.,... Nucci, A. T. (2004). Obtaining a history of sexual victimization from adolescent females secking routine health care. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 71, 170-173. Du Mont, J., Macdonald, S.. White, M., & Turner, L. (2013). Male victims of adult sexual assault: A descriptive study of survivors” use of sexual assault treatment services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2676-2694. Du Mont, J., Macdonald, S., White, M., Tumer, L., White, D., Kaplan, S., & Smith, T. (2014). Client satisfaction with nursing-led sexual assault and domestic violence services in Ontario. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 10, 122-124. Du Mont, J., & White, D. (2007). The uses and impacts of medico- legal evidence in sexual assault cases: A global review. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from: http:// www.svri.org/medico.pdf Dunleavy, K., & Slowik, A. K. (2012). Emergence of delayed post- traumatic stress disorder symptoms related to sexual trauma: 3502-017 Page 13 of 15 EFTA_00001488 EFTA00156829

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Patient-centered and trauma-cognizant management by physical therapists. Physical Therapy Journal, 92, 339-351. Esposito, N. (2006). Women with a history of sexual assault: Health care visits can be reminders of a sexual assault. American Journal of Nursing, 106, 69-73. Filipas, H. H., & Ullman, S. E. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Vic- tims, 16, 673-692. Golding, J. M., Siegel, J. M., Sorenson, S. B., Burnam, M. A., & Stein, J. A. (1989). Social support sources following sexual assault. Jowr- nal of Community Psychology, 17, 92-107. Klevens, J., Kee, R., Trick, W.. Garcia, D., Angulo, F. R., Jones, R.. & Sadowski, L. S. (2012). Effect of screening for partner violence on women’s quality of life: A randomized controlled trial. The Jowr- nal of the American Medical Association, 308, 681-689. Lessing, J. E. (2005). Primary care provider interventions for the delayed disclosure of adolescent sexual assault. Journal of Pedia- trie Health Care, 19, 17-24. Littleton, H. L. (2010). The impact of social support and negative disclosure reactions on sexual assault victims: A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation. Jownal of Trauma & Disassocia- tion, 11, 210-227. Long, S. M., Ullman, S. E., Long, L. M., Mason, G. E., & Starzynski, L. L. (2007). Women’s experiences of male-perpetrated sexual assault by sexual orientation. Violence and Victims, 22, 684-701. MacMillan, H.L., Wathen, C. N., Jamieson, E., Boyle, M. H., Shannon, H. S., Ford-Gilboe, M. F., ... McNutt, L. A. (2009). Screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: A randomized trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 493-501. Mazza, D., Dennerstein, L., & Ryan, V. (1996). Physical, sexual and emotional violence against women: A general practice-based pre- valence study. The Medical Journal of Australia, 164, 14-17. McDonald, S., & Tijerino, A. (2013). Male survivors of sexual abuse and assault: Their experiences. Research and Statistics Division, Department of Justice Canada. Retrieved from http2!/www-justi ce.ge.ca/eng/1p-pr'cj-jp/victinv'r1 3_8/rrl3_8.pdf Monroe, L. M., Kinney, L. M., Weist, M. D., Dafeamekpor, D. S., Dantzler, J., & Reynolds, M. W. (2005). The experience of sexual assault: Findings from a statewide victim needs assessment. Jowr- nal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 767-776. Muganyizi, P. S.. Hogan, N., Emmelin, M., Lindmark, G., Massawe, S., Nystrom, L.. & Axemo, P. (2009). Social reactions to rape: Experiences and perceptions of women rape survivors and their potential support providers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Violence and Victims, 24, 607-626. Muganyizi, P. S., Nystrom, L., Axemo, P., & Emmelin, M. (2011). Managing in the contemporary world: Rape victims and supporters experiences of barriers within the police and the health care system in Tanzania. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3187-3209. Neville, H. A., & Pugh, A. O. (1997). General and culture specific factors influencing African American women’s reporting patterns and perceived social support following sexual assault: An explora- tory investigation. Violence Against Women, 3, 361-381. Plumbo, M. A. (1995). Delayed reporting of sexual assault: Implications for counseling. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 40, 424-427. TRAUMA, VIOLENCE, & ABUSE Popicl, D. A., & Susskind, E. C. (1985). The impact of rape: Social support as a moderator of stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 645-676. Probst, D. R., Turchik, J. A., Zimak, E. H., & Huckins, J. L. (2011). Assessment of sexual assault in clinical practice: Available screen- ing tools for use with different adult populations. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20, 199-226. Resnick, H. S., Holmes, M. M., Kilpatrick, D. G., Clum, G., Acierno, R., Best, C. L., & Saunders, B. E. (2000). Predictors of post-rape medical care in a national sample of women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 214-219. Roberts, S. T., Watlington, C. G., Nett, S. D., & Batten, S. V_ (2010). Sexual trauma disclosure in clinical settings: Addressing diversity. Journal of Trauma & Disassociation, 11, 244-259. Starzynski, L. L., Ullman, S. E., Filipas, H. H., & Townsend, S. M. (2005). Correlates of women’s sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 20, 417-432. Statistics Canada. (1994). Violence against women survey, 1993 [pub- lic use microdata file]. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada. Sturza, M. L., & Campbell, R. (2005). An exploratory study of rape survivors” prescription drug use as a means of coping with sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 353-363. Truman, J., Langton, L., & Planty, M. (2013). Criminal victimization, 2012. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from http:// www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdfiev!2.pdf Ullman, S. E. (1996a). Correlates and consequences of adult sexual assault disclosure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 554-571. Ullman, S. E. (1996b). Do social reactions to sexual assault victims vary by support provider? Violence and Victims, 11, 143-157. Ullman, S. E. (1996c). Social reactions, coping strategies and self- blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 505-526. Ullman, 8. E. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of the social reac- tions questionnaire: A measure of reaction to sexual assault vic- tims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 257-271. Ullman, S. E., & Brecklin, L. R. (2003). Sexual assault history and health-related outcomes in a national sample of women. Psychol- ogy of Women Quarterly, 27, 46-57. Ullman, S. E., & Filipas, H. H. (2001). Correlates of formal and informal support secking in sexual assault victims. Jowrnal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1028-1047. Ullman, S. E., & Najdowski, C. J. (2009). Correlates of serious sui- cidal ideation and attempts in female adult sexual assault survivors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 39, 47-57. Ullman, S. E., & Siegel, J. M. (1995). Sexual assault, social reactions and physical health. Women's Health: Research on Gender, Beha- vior, and Policy, 1, 289-308. Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2012). Health care’s response to women exposed to partner violence: Moving beyond universal screening. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 308, 712-713. Wathen, N. (2012). Health impacts of violent victimization on women and their children. Department of Justice Canada. Retrieved from http://www_justice.ge.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/fv-vfirrl2_12/rrl2_ 12.pdf 3502-017 Page 14 of 15 EFTA_00001489 EFTA00156830

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Lanthier et al. World Health Organization. (2013). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bit streany’ 10665/85240/ 1/9789241548595_eng pdf?ua=1 Zinzow, H., Resnick, H_, Barr, S., Danielson, C., & Kilpatrick, D.(2012). Receipt of post-rape medical care in a national sample of female victims. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 183-187. Author Biographies Stephanie Lanthier is a PhD candidate in Social/Behavioral Health Sciences at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto and a trainee in the Violence and Health Research Program at Women’s College Research Institute. 15 Janice Du Mont is an applicd psychologist and a scientist in the Violence and Health Research Program at Women’s College Research Institute. She is also an associate professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. She examines the impact of gender-based violence on women’s health, with a particular focus on the medical and legal responses to sexual assault. Robin Mason is a scientist in the Violence and Health Research Program at Women’s College Research Institute and an assistant pro- fessor in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health and the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto. In addition, she is the scientific lead of Women’s Xchange, a women’s health knowledge translation and exchange center at Women’s College Hospital designed to promote the development of women’s health research across the province. 3502-017 Page 15 of 15 EFTA_00001490 EFTA00156831