From: " O= EXC HANGEL, ABS OU =EXC HANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP S/CN=72708F8BC5354F44958B87907FFOBCDB AUL" Subject"RE "S02: : Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 00:22:11 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Interview ti (itsédi Ok sorry for the delay. iim: is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored pC Yes, the 302 regardin fin just the short notes along with the invoice. There were no notes off apologize for the confusion in labeling that attached. Ok | figured out th contusion. The terview is ches Im listed at the top because he was present for the interview lected in the 302. = a . . os wo . Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes This is really helpful, and | think we’re down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications — _ & | don’t think we received notes from 7/6/19 — the attachments included a copy of her ID but not any writing. It’s possible there weren't other written notes — the 302, attached, is very short — but just let us know either way? Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for a: just the short contact info notes, with his attorney info and a property invoice — both the notes and the 302 are attached for reference. | think that’s right but just want to confirm. | also didn’t see notes Tim though let us know if it’s in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise missed it, that’s also totally possible. And just a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as 7 which | assume is P| it also has the Uti‘ at the top, which may be where that confusion comes from — | now you were looking into that. | think both those names just show up on that one doc. Also totally happy to chat via phone if that’s easiest to run through these. Thanks again! EFTA00153838

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 13:47 Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes on Sent: ee ay, Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes Thanks very much again for getting us so many 302s recently, we really appreciate it. Collectively, there have been more than 120 interviews in this case, which is incredible. We’ve now completed a full review and cross-reference of all our materials, so wanted to address a handful of loose ends. In terms of reports, | think currently we’re down to only missing three, all of which we have interview notes for but no 302s: And then there are a larger number of interviews where we have a 302 but not hand-written notes. My guess is that for some of these, and possibly most, there aren’t notes because the “interviews” were so short that they just got typed up, but we wanted to check. Also most of them were interviews conducted by other agents (where it was agents other than one or both of you, I’ve indicated below). But if you could please double check to see if there are interview notes for the following, and in particular the few that are in bold? And let us know if any questions or issues. They are: EFTA00153839

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Thanks again! EFTA00153840