From: USANYS)" To: EE (NY) (OGA) (3) Cc: EE USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein - Urgent Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 03:24:05 +0000 Yes, we will send them to you tonight. Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 11:23 PM To: SA NYS) <i Subject: RE: Epstein - Urgent Ok understand. Do you have subpoenas for each readily available? On Aug 11, 2019 11:18 PM, A USANYS) i wrote: If they invoke, we stop the interview and serve them with a subpoena. We are asking OIG not to identify themselves during the interviews. If OIG compels the interview then we cannot use it in a criminal case. Fron ES (NY) (OCA) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 11:16 PM 1: TS (SANS) <i Subject: RE: Epstein - Urgent If they have a right to lawyer as per their contract and invoke that , how would you like to proceed. It's my understanding OIG can compel them to speak as per the Federal contract, not us On Aug 11, 2019 11:13 PM, "Donaleski, Rebekah (USANYS)" hii, wrote: All, as discussed with Amanda, we need to interview these people tomorrow. The ones with the star are the most urgent. Once you guys have a sense of logistics, let’s get on a call to discuss the interviews. They need to be Mirandized and given 1001 warnings. We will send you subpoenas as well. 1. a: FBI — already scheduled for 10am tomorrow)* 2. (duty officer) (need 2 FBI)* 3. (duty officer) (need 2 FB!)* 4. (8/9 shift — potentially in charge of no reassignment) (need 2 FBI)* 5. } shift — potentially in charge of no reassignment) (need 2 FBI)* 6. (0:00-8:00 shift supervisor) (need 2 FBI)* 7. (8:00 shift; hears admission) (need 2 FBI) 8. 8/9 shift 4-12) (need 2 FBI) 9. 8/9 shift 8-4) (need 2 FBI) 10. (8/9 shift 2-10) (need 2 FBI) EFTA00078448

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From is (usanys) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:40 PM @OIG.USDOJ.GOV>; _ (NY) (FS!) > ; (NY) (FBI) Cc: Roos, Nicolas (USANYS) <q > Subject: Epstein - Urgent All — with our apologies for the late hour, we need to speak with you ASAP tonight — can we get on a call? EFTA00078449