From: To: Ce: (USANYS)" (USANYS) [Contractor]" Subject: Re: FBI remarks Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:59:02 +0000 Importance: Normal Got it, J. 11! let them know. On Jul 7, 2019, at 3:56 PM, iS — EE wrote: Circling back on this from earlier this week, | don’t know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there’s no allegation (and it’s not factually correct) that the victims “were made to give” massages — it would be accurate, though, to say “.. . who gave Epstein massages...” Also this may just be me, but | think of a “child” as being pre-puberty — | think JJ is going to say “underage girls” if they want to be consistent? — but of course defer to the FBI on their nomenclature. From: SS, A (USANYS) <a Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 19:27 To: ES (SANS) i; a (SANS) <a; es ) <>; <n >; ns a) Cc: EE, HE (USANYS) [Contractor] x; , FE (USANYS) <i Subject: FBI remarks Hi all, Please see the attached draft remarks from the FBI. I looked them over quickly and they seem to track ours i closely. Let me know if you see any issues. Thanks. EFTA00076027