From: ' _—___ . ~———_——* Subject: F FW: SDNY investigation Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 20:45:03 +0000 I'm available 2/26-2/28 on Original Message----- From: Robert Glassman Sent: Friday, February 7, 2 To: Ce: Nathan Werksman < Subject: Re: SDNY investigation ; Kevin Boyle - | | how’s the week of 2/24 instead? That’s better for her. Robert S. Glassman Panish Shea & Boyle psblaw.com > On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:08 AM, iS - iS wrote: > Robert, > We're still hoping to try to schedule an interview with on February 19 (or the following couple days), per the below -- would that be a possibility? I'll give you a call tomorrow if we haven't connected by then but wanted to bump this from last week. Thank you! ‘Nathan Werksman' <i Kevin Boyle' <x > Subject: RE: SDNY investigation > Robert, > Wanted to follow up on the below in case it was still useful to chat -- some combination of the team will be around next week if you want to have a call. “< > Separately, we're continuing to move forward with the investigation, including interviews with members, and we wanted to see if we might be able to put something on the calendar to come talk with again once we've completed those steps. Would it work for you and her to meet anytime noon or later on EFTA00074874

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

February 19? Or if not the 19th, any availability on the 20th or 21st? > thanks very much, > aonnn! Original Messz > From: : Kevin doyle Nathan Werksman < Subject: RE: SDNY investigation > Robert, available tomorrow (Friday) until about 2 p.m. our time, or also early next week if that's easier. Apologies for the belated reply, it's been a crazy week for us, but we'd be happy to talk. We should be generally anks, > nn--- Original Messag > From: Robert Glassman > > Sent: Wednesday, January 22 Nathan Werksman < Subject: Re: SDNY inveslig > Thanks fll I ended up seeing these too > Our judge is John Koelt] and the magistrate is Barbara Moses. Moskowitz already reached out to us Is there a good time to chat? > Robert S. Glassman Panish Shea & Boyle > psblaw.com On Jan 20, 2020, at 1:11 PM, iS - wrote: > Robert, sending ~ you wouldn't mind letting us know when a judge is assigned, that would also be helpful. In terms of media, it Thanks very much for sending the complaint, we appreciate it. We'll try to keep an eye on the docket, but if was covered in the Daily News on Friday, here https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-epstein-trump-victim-suit-20200118- EFTA00074875

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

m6sqsa2h7 venpfSuewjrkvigo4-story.html And then picked up by the Post and other outlets on Saturday: >> https://nypost.com/2020/01/18/new-jeffrey-epstein-accuser-says-he-molested-her-at- | 3-told-her-to-wear- childrens-underwear/ https://www.the-sun.com/news/274369/jeffrey-epstein-first-victim-kids-underwear/ >> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-790 165 1/Woman-claiming-Jeffrey-Epsteins-victim-says- introduced-Trump-age-14.html thanks, From: Robert Glassman Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 22:18 athan Werksman </> Subject: RE: SDNY investigation sorry for not giving you a heads up on this. That was not my intent. Just been really busy with a couple of other big matters going on now. Please see attached. What media is picking it up? I don’t see anything. Robert Glassman, Esq. Panish Shea & Boyle LLP Los Angeles, CA 90025 Web: www.psblaw.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: >> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone, and delete all copies of this message. >> If you are a potential client, the information you disclose to us by email will be kept in strict confidence and will be protected to the full extent of the law. Please be advised, however, that Panish Shea & Boyle LLP and its lawyers do not represent you until you have signed a retainer agreement with the firm. Until that time, you are responsible for any statutes of limitations or other deadlines for your case or potential case. ) (nail o a | To: Robert Glassman < Ce: >; Nathan Werksman < Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Robert, EFTA00074876

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

>> Based on media reports today it looks like you filed the civil lawsuit? I don't think we realized that was imminent -- could we ask you to please send us a copy of the filing? I don't yet see it on PACER. Nathan Werksman < Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Great, thanks very much. We'll likely start with siblings and mother and then go from there. As soon as we have a sense of when it would be productive for us to return for a follow-up meeting vith we'll reach out -- as I mentioned, we're hoping that will be sometime in January, but just depending on how quickly we're able to schedule these discussions. And as always, please don't hesitate to let us know if anything comes up in the meantime. Nathan Werksman < Subject: Re: SDNY investigation | - yes, all good to contact those folks. Thanks for checking in. Robert S. Glassman Panish Shea & Boyle psblaw.com - On Dec 30, 2019, at 1:10 PM, TS js Robert, > Following up on our most recent meeting with you oo we wanted to confirm that it's alright for us to begin reaching out this i to the contacts s r us -- in particular, we would an expect to con —a and a. and then a: also wanted to see if it we are able at this stage to contact her mother, Who Is ITS a key witness -- I know seem enin wanted to speak with her mother in advance of us doing that. Please let us know if it's alright to make those calJs? separately, if you could please let us know if her brother has happened to have any contact with since we last spoke -- no problem at all if not, but I think she mentioned that was a possibility so wanted to check. Thanks very much, and hope you're having a good holiday season. EFTA00074877

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

> thanks again, >; Nathan Werksman < Subject: RE: SDNY investigation > Totally understand, just wanted to ask. We'll see you Monday at 11:00. And thanks for that additional info as well. ----Original Message----- > From: Robert Glassman sr tsm ca sommm ent: Friday, December 13, 2 6: Nathan Werksman < Subject: Re: SDNY investigation | | unfortunately, we can’t do earlier than 11. She just needs time to get to my office after taking care of kid stuff ete. >>> Re the mom, my understanding is that she is overseas somewhere. Pretty sure she’s not in the US. I will find out and we can chat about it on Monday. > Robert S. Glassman > Panish Shea & Boyle > psblaw.com > On Dec 12, 2019, at 1:30 PM, TS — js wrote: Robert, We wanted to ask if it might be possible to start at 10:00 on Monday rather than 11:00? If not, we totally understand (I think you may have wanted time to meet with her before starting with us) but wanted to check. Separately, I know eft you a message earlier, but since we're emailing about this we can just ask -- we were wondering if it might be possible to tell us where mother currently lives? Not her literal address, but just city and/or state -- we don't have any intention of contacting her before we speak to you and your client in person, but just for our longer-term logistical planning, we're wondering where we would be headed if and when an interview of her were to be appropriate. thanks, EFTA00074878

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 13:15 To: Robert Glassman < Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Confirmed, thanks -- we'll see you then. And just on substance, I think we mentioned these topics when we spoke on the phone earlier, but just to refresh, I expect we'll want to talk through some additional specifics on travel, we'll talk more about other steps we'll be looking to take in our investigation for corroboration and what the appropriate timing and format of that would be, and to start to talk about specific conduct by Epstein and/or Maxwell to whatever von i comfortable with that at this stage. And we'll also likely refresh on some other topics as well, but just to flag some of the more immediate areas we'll expect to cover. Let us know if it's useful to chat again before Monday, otherwise we'll see you then. thanks again, ----Original Message----- From: Robert Glassman Sent: Wednesday, Decem >; Nathan Werksman < Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Let's do 11 a.m. on Monday. Robert Glassman, Esq. Panish Shea & Boyle LLP Los Angeles, CA 90025 Web: www.psblaw.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: >>>> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone, and delete all copies of this message. If you are a potential client, the information you disclose to us by email will be kept in strict confidence and will be protected to the full extent of the law. Please be advised, however, that Panish Shea & Boyle LLP and its lawyers do not represent you until you have signed a retainer agreement with the firm. Until that time, you are responsible for any statutes of limitations or other deadlines for your case or potential case. From: ) [nai 0 Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 8:26 AM To: Robert Glassman SS Uts—SSSCS@Sd EFTA00074879

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

athan Werksman iii Subject: RE: SDNY investigation > Robert, >>>> That's great, thanks very much. Do you have a preference on timing? Anytime that morning starting at 10:00 a.m. or later would be fine for us, or we could also start early afternoon if that's easier--whatever you and prefer. And our hope is that we'd be able to cover everything on Monday, but we'll also be available on sday if that ends up being useful as well. ue: ----Original Message----- > From: Robert Glassman smuniauimsspemenl > Sent: Tuesday, December IU, ZUTS >; Nathan Werksman < Subject: Re: SDNY investigation >>>> Monday morning works at my office. Tuesday may also work too if you need more time. But confirm for Monday. > Robert S. Glassman > Panish Shea & Boyle > psblaw.com wrote: Robert, Following up on our call, in terms of logistics, we can come to California to meet with anytime this coming Sunday, Monday, or Tuesday, if any of those work? Also, if it's at all possible to either set aside a significant amount of time on one day or--possibly preferably--a few hours on two consecutive days (and if so, we could do the second meeting on Wednesday if that's helpful), that will allow us to review relevant case notes, do quick research, or anything else that would provide for helpful follow-up where we'd just need a little time between discussion sessions. And as always, happy to discuss via phone if that's helpful. thanks, Sent: Monday, December 09, 2019 17:46 To: Robert G Nathan Werksman = ts—SSCSd >; Subject: RE: SDNY investigation EFTA00074880

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

> Thanks Robert -- we'll call you in 5-10 minutes, just gathering everybody up in the same place. Thanks very much. > Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Yes. Call me on my cell today. Robert S. Glassman Panish Shea & Boyle psblaw.com >>> Following up on our discussion a couple weeks ago, would it make sense to have a quick call later this Ww week or early next to check in on current status? We also have one additional data point we'd like to convey as well, at your convenience. > thanks, ----Original Message----- > From: Robert Glassma i/CARSE3 me > Sent: Friday, November 22 >; Nathan Werksman -ti<‘“i‘i‘izS EFTA00074881

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

> Subject: Re: SDNY investigation > Thanks. Cell is best J > Robert S$. Glassman > Panish Shea & Boyle > psblaw.com > wrote: > On Nov 22, 2019, at 10:14 AM, [i EFTA00074882