From: To: Ce: Subject: RE: FBI remarks Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:56:25 +0000 Importance: Normal Circling back on this from earlier this week, | don’t know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there’s no allegation (and it’s not factually correct) that the victims “were made to give” massages — it would be accurate, though, to say “... who gave Epstein massages...” Also this may just be me, but | think of a “child” as being pre-puberty — | think JJ is going to say “underage girls” if they want to be consistent? — but of course defer to the FBI on their nomenclature. From: A, Sa (SANS) <r Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 19:27 To: ES (SANS) i ; TS (USNS) <a; <>; <>; >) Ce: EE, BE (USANYS) [Contractor] i; i SG (SANS) <i Subject: FBI remarks Hi all, Please see the attached draft remarks from the FBI. I looked them over quickly and they seem to track ours pretty closely. Let me know if you see any issues. Thanks. EFTA00068406