From: To: Ce: Subject Date Attachments All, For filing purposes, : RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine : Fri, 29 Oct 2021 22:44:53 +0000 : 1. Motion_to_Preclude_the_Introduction_of_Alleged_Co- Conspirator_ Statements [redacted].pdf; la. Ex._1_to Motion_to Preclude_the_Introduction_of_Alleged_Co- Conspirator Statements _[redacted].pdf; 2. Motion_to_Exclude Evidence Prsnt_to Rule 404(b) [redacted].pdf; 2a. Ex. A to Motion to Exclude Evidence Prsnt_to Rule 404(b) [redacted].pdf; 3._Motion_to_ Exclude Under FRE 702_and_Daubert_[redacted].pdf; 3b._Ex. 2 to Motion _to Exclude Under FRE 702 and_Daubert_[redacted].pdf; 4. Motion_to Exclude Accuser-3_Evidence_[redacted].pdf; 7._Motion_to Exclude _Government_Exhibit_52_[redacted].pdf; 8._Motion_to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo_Way_ [redacted].pdf; 9. Motion_to Suppress _Identification_[redacted] Final.pdf; 10. Motion_to_Preclude_Law_Enforcement_Witnesses_from_Offering_Expert_Opinion_Te stimony_[redacted].pdf; 13. Motion_to_Preclude_Introduction_of Government_Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and_ 606 _[redacted].pdf; Govt_Omnibus Opp_[redacted]_Final.pdf; !2021.10.27_Maxwell_ Reply ISO _Motns_ In Limine_ [redacted] Final.pdf , attached are redacted versions of the defendant’s motions and exhibits, the government’s omnibus opposition, and the defendant’s omnibus reply. Below are our notes on which exhibits should be sealed. Please let us know if you would Defense Motions Sealed like to add any redactions or if you have any questions. The following exhibits should be sealed « Exhibit Ato « Exhibit B to « Exhibit 1 to « Exhibit 2 to « Exhibit Ato « Exhibit Ato Motion 4 (grand jury testimony) Motion 4 (grand jury testimony) Motion 7 (contact book) Motion 7 (deposition) Motion 8 (inventory) Motion 9 (photobook) « Exhibit to Motion 13 (various exhibits) Redactions (attach ed) « Motion 1 and Exhibit 1 to Motion 1 « Motion 2 and Exhibit A to Motion 2 « Motion 3 and Exhibit 2 to Motion 3 « Motion 4 « Motion 7 « Motion 8& EFTA00025062

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

« Motion 9 « Motion 10 « Motion 13 No redactions « We are not seeking redactions to defense opening briefs for defense motions 5, 6, 11, and 12. « Weare not seeking redactions to Exhibit 1 to Motion 3 (Government expert notice) Government Opposition « We are not seeking to redact Government exhibits A and B (articles) Defense Reply Sealed The following exhibits should be sealed « Exhibit A (tax documents) + Exhibit B (302) « Exhibit C (medical report) « Exhibit D (transcript) No redactions « We are not seeking redactions to defense Exhibit E (English indictment) For: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:21 PM To: Christian Everde!! <i ; ii 0881 C STERNHEIM <>; Laura Menninger <q; Jeff Pagliuca ST >; > Subject: RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Happy to jump on a call. We're almost finished with the materials we'll be sending you in a second wave, so why don’t we get the first wave filed, and we'll send you the second set, and then we can get on the phone. Does that work? From: Christian Everdell > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:19 PM 1: | 085 C STERNHEIM <>; Laura Menninger <>; Jeff Pagliuca a Cs a; > Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Got it. We are filing the response now. | was thinking through the joint cover letter and | think there are a few more logistics we have to discuss. Can you jump ona quick call? F ror: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:16 PM To: Christian €verd| <a; 055 STERNHEIM <>; Laura Menninger <>; Jeff Pagliuca a a ; EFTA00025063

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Subject: RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Thanks for asking — yes, that’s correct. From: Christian Everdell <q > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:06 PM 0: A; a 088 C STERNHEIM <>; Laura Menninger <>; Jeff Pagliuca a eT eeee—CSC‘iS Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine | Just so | am clear on sequencing, you are now waiting for us to file the redacted version of our response brief, correct? Form: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 5:49 PM To: Christian Everde!| <i -; [ll 5.0551 C STERNHEIM <>; Laura Menninger <q; Jeff Pagliuca a SS Sl Subject: RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Thanks, Chris. We'll get this first group filed and then send you the next batch. From: Christian Everdell qq > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 5:42 PM 10: i; 6085! CSTERNHEM <i; Laura Menninger i; Jeff Poclivco <i es Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine | The redactions are consistent with what the government had proposed before. We do not have any redactions to add to these documents. But for the record, we object to all of the government's proposed redactions. Please send me the next batch when you have them ready. Thanks, Chris Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 4:55 PM To: Christian Everdell <>; 8088! C STERNHEIM <q; Laura Menninger $e Cc: > ; EFTA00025064

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

es) < Subject: Redactions: Government motion in limine All, Thanks for the call this afternoon, it was helpful to work through the mechanics of filing redactions this afternoon. As we discussed, we’re sending you versions of the following documents, with redactions applied: (1) the Government's motion in limine, (2) the defendant’s opposition, and (3) the Government's reply. Please let us know if you would like us to add any redactions to these versions, and we'll get them filed. With respect to Exhibits: « Weare attaching a proposed redacted version of Government exhibit A. « Only defense exhibits E and G can be filed publicly without redactions. « All other defense exhibits to the defense opposition should be filed under seal. Best, Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 EFTA00025065