Fron: a ' <a Tos’ __ Ss Subject: RE: Forfeiture question Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 21:10:12 +0000 Definitely feel free to kick him to us in the first instance if that’s preferable, and yeah, the two of us and J His firm generally represents a handful of people (most prominently qi -———, Dut others as well) but we’ve primarily been dealing with Florida-based partner Sigrid McCawley and hadn’t yet heard from Matt. Thanks. Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:07 CS <>: a a) | < Subject: Re: Forfeiture question Who does he represent again? I’m inclined to tell him to talk to the case team in the first instance, unless you guys would prefer us to be involved up front. And remind me, || is on the team and should be included in emails? Anyone else at this point? Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2019, at 5:05 PM, Pod Ut—isSCS wrote: No, we haven’t heard anything from them about forfeiture. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2019, at 5:02 PM, hii i wrote: Do you guys know what this is about? Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Matthew L. Schwartz" (i> Date: October 13, 2019 at 2:58:27 PM EDT To: " Subject: Forfeiture question Do either of you guys or the appropriate other person have 2 minutes to discuss a somewhat time-sensitive, but by no means urgent, Epstein-related forfeiture question in the next few days? Matthew L. Schwartz EFTA00021161

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

EFTA00021162