From: " USANYS) To: A USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein forfeiture Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:12:43 +0000 Probably — although her posture is different now that she is the principal subject; she may think the chances of being charged have gone up and want to talk us out of it. From: TS (USANYS) <a Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:06 AM 0: TS (SANS) <i Subject: Re: Epstein forfeiture | can’t conceive of her being willing to come in with no protection at all if she wasn’t willing to come in under a proffer agreement. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 14, 2019, at 9:03 AM, [i (USANYS) <> wrote: He also wants us to reach out to J counsel, make clear that the investigation is active and continuing, and either ask if there is any movement on her position/potential for cooperation against others, and/or if she wants to speak to us under an innocence proffer and explain her side of the story, including victimization. From: EE (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:01 AM To: AS (USANYS) <i; TS (SAN YS) 3 <i > Subject: Epstein forfeiture | ran into Geoff this morning, and he said he’d like to meet this afternoon — | think around 230 or 3, does that work? FYI, he sounds more bullish than | think we were thinking, so there may need to be some expectations managing. Chief, Public Corruption Unit United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza — EFTA00019342