From: Christian Everdell (i i i 7 _____!- Ce: “Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq." Laura Menninger < >, Jeff Pagliuca < Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Stip Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:03:31 +0000 Attachments: Stipulation Trial_ Testimony.DOCX Following-up on our conversation today, is the revised stipulation acceptable to the government? Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 7:03 PM To: Christian Everdell <q ee ES Bobbi C. Sternheim, £9. TE: Laura Menninger — 0—“‘iésé‘éiR TT oO rere Stip Hey Chris, Following up on our conversation today regarding the stip, would you agree to have the sentence say that the document is a “true and accurate copy of the transcript of one witness's trial testimony, but not the full trial transcript, given on February 26....”? If so, we are fine with the stip — and, of course, happy to consider other language that makes the same point. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00014647