From: To: (USANYS)" <j Subject: FW: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:01:06 +0000 Attachments: 2021-04-30 Gov't _Letter_to Manley.v3.docx Updated version attached. Let me know if you're good with this, and I'll send a pdf to defense counsel. FYI I’ve changed the cc line, since BSF is now in theory counsel of record in the case, and we’re not sending this to them. From: IS (USA NYS) <i a Thursday, April 29, 2021 2:45 PM Co: <; I (SANS) <i a fs fF re — 3 —————_F Cit; Subject: RE: HE nice work on this, my edits are attached. From: a Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 11:01 AM _ _ er Cc: A) <>; es (SAN YS) <i; ——————J Ss CiCtés Subject: RE: In case it’s useful while we're troubleshooting this issue today, I’m attaching the working draft. We'll let you know if we find additional authorities on this or obtain different guidance From: sre Thursday, April 29, 2021 10:32 AM To: ES (USANYS) <>; TS (SANS) <i; “i 7 fx 97 ti, F es) <n Subject: ay as We're working on drafting a letter in response to the attached, and wanted to give you a heads up. We hope to have a draft for you this afternoon, in the hopes of sending the draft to defense counsel tonight as part of the meet-and-confer directed by Judge Nathan. | think that leaves sufficient time for filing tomorrow. Although we’re mindful of third party privacy interests, for non-parties who are neither witnesses nor victims in the case, | do have concerns about entertaining redaction/intervention requests, given the high volume of people who may ask to be heard or assert a right to review and redact documents if this were entertained. Thanks, EFTA00013434

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew’s Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00013435