ge ——_cane Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000 Yes, I think we should. Thanks for flagging. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2020, at 3:56 PM, iS - Swot: Hl is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it’s unnecessary. | don’t think those are substantive docs but | defer. From: A (USANYS) <a Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55 oS <>; SS (S\N 'S) <i Cc: TS ) <r ; en) <[ns > Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be Fron: <i > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM To: TS (SANS) i ; SS (SANS) <i CS <i ; TS) < Se > Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Yes, | think this document accurately describes the materials we’ve received, with just a note that it doesn’t appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, | think that word may need to be added. thanks, =. From: a (USANYS) <i Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40 1: ES (SANS) a as <a > Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II HM — ve updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can? EFTA00011147

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

HB - !’ve tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized the new stuff we’re looking to share? Thanks, EFTA00011148