From: ‘EE (UsAN YS) [Contractor] (i To: ' (USANYS)" < >, A Us ANys) [Contractor]" < Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:02:36 +0000 Attachments: 3521-003.pdf; 3521-004.pdf || the two re-stamped versions are attached. !’ll call AMM chambers and set a time for me to bring over the thumb drive containing the supplemental 3500 production (with the correct 3521-003 and 3521-004 included). Thanks! From (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 9:48 AM 1: ES (SANS) I sans) (Contractor a Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials Thanks so much for flagging, HM | just re-stamped the materials as 3521-003 and 3521-004, saved here. I've loaded the two files to the thumb drive for If that contains the supplemental 3500 production and swapped out the incorrect versions. If that sounds good to go, | can bring it over to chambers later this morning. Since I'm joining this production a bit late, do these two re-stamped files need to be sent out anywhere else? Thanks! From: SS (SANS) <i Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:59 PM To: RE (usanys) [Contractor] <> ; ss) [Contractor] a Cc: TS ) < Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials The index listed this correctly as 3521-003 and 3521-004, but we produced as 3521-004 and 3521-005 (I think). When you have a chance, can you please confirm? If so, | think let’s reproduce as 3521-003 an 3521-004, but let me know if you think that will be more confusing/make more work. Thanks, From: Laura Menninger <j sere Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:53 PM CS <a (USA NYS) <i; > or Ce: Jeff P2givc cc Subject: [EXTERNAL] US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials Counsel — We were not provided GE 21-003 material. EFTA00009981

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Can you please confirm whether that was intentional, and if not, provide it? Thank you, Laura Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. EFTA00009982