From: Christian Everdell <CEverdell@CohenGresser.com> (USANYS)" < Ce: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>, 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <besternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:05:54 +0000 Inline-Images: image001 .jpg | plan to arrive at the warehouse on April 12 with an investigator and a paralegal at around 9:30am. Does that work? Thanks, Chris From: Laura Menninger [mailto:lmenninger@hmflaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2021 4:23 PM ES: A: IT (UsANys) Cc: Jeff Pagliuca; Christian Everdell; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes My apologies, | meant to include in my previous email that we could have the Bronx view on Monday, April 12. Thank you for the logistics. Regarding the spreadsheets you provided, | have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as “Highly Confidential” and not “bulky.” These appear to include: NY Evidence List « Items 1B127-130 (4 boxes). « Item 1B13 (1 box) Florida Evidence List « Item 1, Subitem 26 — one large framed photo from Master Bedroom. Second, with regard to the “Bulky” photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to address with the Court promptly any issues related to our request to view all evidence. Fourth, Electronic surveillance — Your email yesterday stated that these were all “electronic files” with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates “Blu-Ray Disks;” is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as “one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07”; | am suspicious that “one original EFTA00015770

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

recording of an interview” is not truly only an “electronic” file? | was practicing law in 2007 and do not recall “electronic files” being the standard then. Can you please confirm? | know that Chris has written separately about the many files for which the metadata has apparently been stripped, so we will have to address purely electronic information at another date. Shredded Paper — Yes, we need to review that as well. “Missing from Assigned Box” items — can you please provide more of an explanation for all “missing items”? | will let you know any other issues as | see them. However, now that we have made travel plans in reliance on your agreement to produce all evidence items, | am hoping that you can promptly answer these questions so that we can resolve any of them as needed this week. Thank you, -Laura Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue | Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger@hmflaw.com Fron: <i Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 1:44 PM To: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; iT! Hii > (USANYS) <_j Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Hi Laura, The Bronx warehouse is located at 2350 Lafayette Ave, Bronx, NY. There is plenty of street parking outside of the building. Whatever day you wish to have the review conducted at the warehouse, an AUSA and an agent will meet the attorney, investigator, and paralegal at the warehouse to escort them into the building to the evidence review room. The AUSA will remain present at the warehouse to answer any questions that may arise. The FBI has informed me that they can make the evidence available for review at the warehouse any day next week or the week of April 19". Please just let me know what day you prefer, and we will coordinate with the FBI to arrange for the review. e=] © uw o , Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York | St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00015771

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: Laura Menninger <imenninger@hmflaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 3:30 PM Ce: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell(@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Thank you for the updated spreadsheets and the information regarding the timing of the review at 500 Pearl. | believe we will be able to have an attorney, investigator and paralegal present at the Bronx warehouse to take photos of the “excluded from transportation” items. Please let us know the particulars for that visit when you have a moment. Thank you, Laura Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue | Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger@hmflaw.com From: a) < Ss Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 10:06 AM To: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; i) (i>; (USANYS) <> Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Good morning, Attached please find the revised spreadsheets, which reflect designations under the Protective Order for the three mini- VHS tapes that | referenced below. | learned this morning that the Marshals intend to bring Ms. Maxwell back to the MDC each review day at 4:30pm. So we can plan for the review to take place at 500 Pearl Street from 9:30am to 4:30pm each day beginning on April 13°, Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00015772

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 12:09 AM To: ‘Laura Menninger’ <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; i. ) <a. >; [ay (USANYS) <j > Ce: Jeff Pagliuca' <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; ‘Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com)' <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Good evening, Today, the Marshals confirmed that they will produce Ms. Maxwell to 500 Pearl Street on April 13, 2021 and every day thereafter until the evidence review is complete. My understanding is that Ms. Maxwell should arrive to 500 Pear! Street at approximately 9:30am each morning. So we are confirmed for evidence review in the proffer rooms on the 5" floor of the 500 Pear! Street courthouse beginning at 9:30am on April 13". | will plan to be present and to continue assisting with logistics. If any questions or concerns arise, please feel free to call my cellphone at EE. To assist in preparing for this review, attached please find annotated versions of the three evidence spreadsheets | previously emailed to you: (1) a spreadsheet of New York evidence; (2) a spreadsheet of Florida evidence; and (3) a more detailed spreadsheet of the sub-items contained in the Florida evidence spreadsheet. A couple things to note: « These spreadsheets now indicate the Protective Order designation, if any, for each item to be reviewed. As you will see, there are three mini-VHS tapes that | need to double check before assigning a final designation. | expect to be able to access a mini-VHS cassette player later this week, at which point | will be able to provide an updated spreadsheet with a confirmed designation for those three items. Additionally, please note that there is one item about which we plan to provide you with a letter later this week. These spreadsheets also indicate where each item will be made available for the defense to review. As you will see, we have now learned that one item (consisting of shredded paper) is currently at FBI headquarters and will not be available for review next week. Please let me know if you believe you need to review that item, and | will inquire as to whether and how it can be relocated to New York. Additionally, all 1D items consist of electronic data (as opposed to 1B items, which are physical items). As is noted in the spreadsheets, the electronic data that constitute the 1D items in this case have either already been produced to you in discovery (e.g., pen register data, GPS data, and aerial footage), or are digital recordings of interviews that will be produced as non-testifying witness statements. Because these 1D items are data files stored in the FBI system, there is no corresponding physical item to produce for you to review. Please let me know when you would like to schedule a time for a smaller group from the defense team to review evidence at the Bronx warehouse. Best, mz Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York | St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: ) Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 10:48 PM To: Laura Menninger <imenninger@hmilaw.com>; i. ) <a. >; EFTA00015773

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

(USANYS) <j > Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Laura, Thank you for your email and for your understanding as we work through the logistics of arranging this review. Your modifications and clarifications are acceptable to us. Below | address each specifically: The FBI can arrange for a lawyer, investigator, and paralegal to inspect and photograph the precluded items at the Bronx warehouse either next week or the week after. Please let us know what day you would like to arrange for that inspection, and | will coordinate with the FBI accordingly. | would suggest trying to schedule this visit early next week if possible so that if there are items that you believe need to be produced to 500 Pear! Street, we will have time to do so during a subsequent day of review at 500 Pear! if the FBI agrees to transport the item(s). Tomorrow, | will send you evidence spreadsheets with annotations of which items the FBI will not be producing to 500 Pearl Street, and which items we are designating under the Protective Order. Please note that certain items will be designated “Confidential,” in which case they may be photographed, but the photographs should be treated as Confidential under the Protective Order. Other items will be designated “Highly Confidential,” in which case they may not be photographed, absent specific authorization from an AUSA. | note the possibility of authorization to photograph this latter category because some Highly Confidential evidence items include both nude and non-nude portions, in which case we would permit photography of the non-nude portions. In light of our decision to produce non-testifying witness statements beginning on April 12, 2021, we are no longer segregating any electronic media that contain witness statements during this review. This is because all of the witness statements on the electronic media in the FBI's possession are from witnesses whom the Government does not expect to call at trial in this case. Please note that we intend to produce digital audio files to you containing the contents of the electronic media with these non-testifying witness statements, but you are of course welcome to review the original recordings themselves. In terms of space, | have been informed that we will not be permitted to conduct this review in a courtroom and will instead be required to do so in the proffer rooms. | have reserved the two largest proffer rooms available at 500 Pearl. We can use the largest proffer room for evidence review, and the slightly smaller proffer room as a private meeting space for the defense team. Confirmed, | will ask the FBI to bring all electronic highly confidential images to 500 Pear! Street, including the 2,100 that were not previously reviewed and the electronic images that were previously provided for review at the MDC. Confirmed, | will ask the FBI to bring the 7 hard-copy highly confidential materials to 500 Pearl Street. As | mentioned earlier today in a separate email, the FBI and AUSAs are prepared to facilitate this review beginning April 13" and continuing every day thereafter until your review is complete. | have also formally requested that the Marshals produce Ms. Maxwell to 500 Pearl Street on April 13 and every day thereafter until the review is complete. The Marshals previously confirmed their willingness to produce Ms. Maxwell for such a review in general, but they have not yet confirmed their ability to do so on any particular dates. | will let you know as soon as the Marshals inform me whether they can accommodate these specific dates. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York | St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00015774

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: Laura Menninger <lmenninger@hmflaw.com> Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 5:36 PM oS <<; (USANYS) <> Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Thank you for your email. Your proposal is largely acceptable to us, with the following modifications and clarifications. For the items that you propose below to exclude from the evidence transported to 500 Pear! Street (with the exception of the cash held at 26 Federal Plaza), we will need to have access for a lawyer, investigator and paralegal to inspect and photograph those items at the Bronx warehouse. This seems to include the bulky items, electronic devices and “fragile” items. eo Once they are photographed and shared with the team and our client, we can decide whether a separate inspection by our client and/or any expert is necessary at a later time. To be clear, the government’s photos of these same items are insufficient. If there are any items we are not permitted to photograph (and perhaps you will be able to tell us by April 5 which those are), we likely will need to have those transported because there is no way for our client to inspect the evidence. We can wait to finalize this issue until you have finished deciding what items you consider non-photographable, and if we can’t agree, then discuss next steps. Please let us know when these “non-transportable” items can be inspected and photographed at the Bronx warehouse. It makes sense that it would be done soon so that we can raise any issues as necessary with the Court. For playing any of the electronic media, we will obtain the necessary equipment to play at 500 Pearl Street and seek permission to bring those devices into the Courthouse. You can segregate out the section of recordings that contain “witness statements” and advise us then which ones cannot be played, but we still need to inspect the outside of those recordings. As far as space, can you please advise whether the largest proffer room will be available for review of evidence? It is my understanding that it can accommodate a large number of the team members at one time. If not, is a locked courtroom available for us to review the evidence? The agents could bring out a limited number of boxes at a time for inspection. We understand that the evidence will not be taken outside of the monitoring of the agents or your staff and appreciate that you will have a separate room for us to consult with our client privately (without the evidence). We understand that all of the highly confidential materials, including not only the 2,100 images not previously disclosed as well as the electronic images that were only shown to NY counsel and the client at the MDC, will be available for review on a singular laptop at 500 Pear! Street. We also understand the 7 hard-copy highly confidential materials will also be available for inspection at 500 Pear! Street. ° ° Please let me know if you have any questions or disagree with my understanding. If you agree, we can then proceed as scheduled on April 12 and continue day to day until we are finished, with a break if necessary for the arraignment. Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue | Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger@hmflaw.com EFTA00015775

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: TT Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 4:38 PM To: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; iT!) (iii > (USANYS) <_ Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Counsel, Thank you for your email. Below please find our response. If this is acceptable to you, then we will proceed with arranging the logistics of having your client produced to 500 Pearl the week of April 12" and the week April 19". We will also arrange for the FBI to transport evidence to 500 Pearl for review the week of April 12'h, Physical Evidence « It is not reasonable or feasible to insist that the FBI bring all physical evidence to 500 Pearl Street. That said, we are certainly willing to work with you to ensure that your client can review any physical items that are material to the preparation of her defense. We would propose excluding the below items from production to 500 Pearl: eo We appreciate your note that the massage tables are not needed, which will certainly help with the logistics of transport. We also appreciate your indication that the cash items from 26 Federal Plaza do not need to be produced. Those are the only items not located in the Bronx warehouse. o The FBI has seized dozens of electronic devices, including desktop computers, servers, and laptops, from Jeffrey Epstein’s residences in 2019. Photographs of those devices were produced in our August 2020 productions as part of the search warrant photographs, and you have received copies of the data that was seized from those devices pursuant to a warrant. The production of these devices would be very cumbersome, and we do not see any value in looking at an electronic device that cannot be turned on. The framed pictures are bulky and cumbersome to transport. These are also very delicate and are difficult to transport. Photographs of those seized images were already provided to you as part of the photographs from the searches of Epstein’s residences. Certain items seized from the New York residence are bulky, fragile, and/or difficult to transport. These include plaster busts of female torsos and a stuffed dog. Photographs of these items were already provided to you from the search of the New York residence. The remaining physical items of evidence would fit into approximately 15 to 20 boxes. The FBI has indicated that it would be feasible to transport those boxes to 500 Pear! Street. ° ° ° Regarding your request for equipment that can play the recordings, we believe they would require a VCR, a cassette player, a CD player, an adapter for a micro VHS tape, and a microcassette player. If you wish to play these recordings at 500 Pearl, you will need to provide that equipment. We have asked the FBI whether any other equipment would be necessary and will let you know if that is the case prior to the date of your review. It is our understanding that any recordings that are not witness statements and that are not highly confidential have been produced to you in discovery. We are not aware of any discoverable, non-highly confidential, recordings that were not produced to you as part of the Government's discovery productions in the fall. To confirm that understanding, we are working with the FBI to physically doublecheck each recording. If we identify any discoverable recordings that have not already been produced, we will promptly provide them to you. The segregation of highly confidential material will require the FBI and an AUSA to physically review each item to confirm the item’s status. We will endeavor to do so by your requested date of April 5, 2021. EFTA00015776

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

« Wecan confirm that neither the AUSA(s) nor the agent(s) will record or attempt to record any part of the evidence review or conversations among the defense team or with the defendant during this review. Although the evidence cannot be left outside of the presence of an agent, we will ensure that a room is available for the defense team and the defendant to confer privately away from the agent(s) and the AUSA(s) without monitoring. As for your request for a space large enough to fit 8 members of the defense team, the defendant, an agent, an AUSA, and the evidence, my office cannot control the space that the Marshals allow us to use at 500 Pearl outside of the proffer rooms. We will certainly request as large a space as possible, but if we are required to use the proffer rooms, then members of the defense team may need to rotate in and out of the room. | know members of the defense team have been in those proffer rooms before, and they can hopefully provide some thoughts on how we might use the proffer room space effectively for your purposes. If the Court grants authorization for the defense to bring electronic devices into 500 Pearl, that is certainly fine with the Government, and you may note our consent in your request to Judge Nathan for such authorization. Highly Confidential Electronic Images « The 2,100 electronic images were recovered during the responsiveness review of images and videos seized from Jeffrey Epstein’s devices, which review was not complete until early November 2020. We indicated on page 4 the cover letter to our November 9, 2020 production, which included all other images and videos from those devices, that “the Federal Bureau of Investigation (‘FBI’) seized multiple nude and partially nude images from several for the above-listed electronic devices. All such images have been designated Highly Confidential. The FBI will make these images available for review by the defense upon request.” We did not receive a request from the defense to review these images until your March 8, 2021 letter, which requested to “view and inspect all materials designated by your office as ‘Highly Confidential’ under the terms of the Protective Order”. We did not ask the FBI to bring the 7 hard copy images to the MDC in the fall because we did not understand you to be requesting a review of physical, non-electronic evidence during those meetings. Our understanding of the defense request at that time was to review the electronic highly confidential images that were recovered from CDs from Epstein’s residence. We will ensure that the 7 hard copy images are available to you for review at 500 Pearl. Best, mz Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York | St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 5:19 PM Ce: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes All, We have considered your proposal. Unfortunately, it does not permit us an adequate ability to review the evidence in the case and does not permit our client to meaningfully participate in her own defense. EFTAQ0015777

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

First, we are unable to meaningfully review the evidence without the benefit of our laptops and other electronic devices which are needed to take notes of our review. We also need access to our devices during the review to compare the physical evidence with the electronic discovery and with our work product. Second, we need to provide our client the ability to review all discovery, including any recordings, in order to assist in her own defense. Presuming that she will not be taken to the FBI downtown office, then your proposal offers no means by which she can both inspect a recording in its physical form and listen to the recording at the same time. In order to address the deficiencies in your proposal, we believe the following are necessary: Physical Evidence « All of the physical evidence currently located in the FBI Bronx warehouse will be transported to 500 Pearl Street and made available during the week of April 12, with our client present, in a room sufficiently large to accommodate 8 attorneys and investigators. eo We do not need the “bulky” massage tables transported; if there are any other extremely large evidence pieces, let us know what they are and we can consider whether we can have someone review and photograph those at the Bronx warehouse at an earlier time. e From your email, it appears that only two items are not located at the Bronx warehouse — both envelopes with cash. Please confirm this. We do not need the two “cash” evidence items transported to 500 Pearl. o If there are other evidence items housed somewhere other than the Bronx, please let us know what they are and where they are. « Wewill be permitted to bring our laptops, and a camera, into 500 Pearl Street; we are happy to seek permission from Judge Nathan to do so. « Either the FBI can provide the equipment necessary to listen to any of the recordings at 500 Pearl Street or we can bring the necessary equipment. If we are to provide the equipment, we will need to know in advance the formats of each recording so that we can be prepared. You can note that on your Excel spreadsheet by the item number by March 29 to give us adequate time to secure the necessary equipment. « The FBI can segregate any physical evidence that you deem “highly confidential.” You can identify any “highly confidential” physical evidence items on your Excel spreadsheets by April 5 (one week before the evidence view). If we need to photograph or reproduce any such item for expert evaluation, we will seek leave of court. Otherwise, we will not photograph any such items during the review during the week of April 12. This will ensure the evidence review proceeds smoothly and there will not be any need to ask permission to photograph on an item by item basis. « The FBI also can segregate any recordings which we will be able to inspect, but not listen to, during the evidence view the week of April 12. You can note such designation on your Excel spreadsheet. If we disagree, we can seek leave of the Court in advance. « We understand that an FBI Agent and/or AUSA may be present during our physical evidence review at 500 Pearl Street but of course must ensure that no recordings are made of our conversations and also ensure that there is a separate, secure room in which we can confer with our client during the evidence view without monitoring by the government. « Please confirm whether all electronic recordings (other than the highly-confidential images and videos described below) have previously been produced to us, and if not, please explain which ones were not produced by the discovery deadlines last fall and why. Highly Confidential Electronic Evidence « Can you please explain why 2,100 + 7 “highly confidential” images have not been shared with us yet? It was our understanding that you previously provided all “highly confidential” images to our client — and to defense counsel — for review at the MDC in November. We are confused about where these previously undisclosed items were located and why they have not yet been made available for inspection and review. « During the week of April 19, Ms. Maxwell should be produced to 500 Pear! Street to review (with counsel and a defense staff member, on the 1 laptop provided) all of the 5,507 electronic images and video marked “highly confidential”. These should be segregated into the three categories you describe (never-before produced, previously produced, and the 7 hard-copy images). EFTA00015778

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Please let us know if you will not agree to any of these steps so that we can address the issues with the Court. Thank you. Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue | Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger@hmflaw.com For: <i Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 4:40 PM To: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; TTT Hi > ii (USANYS) <j > Ce: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes All, Attached please find two spreadsheets documenting all physical evidence in the FBI's custody, as well as a corresponding discovery cover letter. We are sending a copy of these files to the MDC for your client as well. In response to your questions, the FBI has informed me of the following: Regarding the Highly Confidential nude/partially nudge images to be reviewed at 500 Pear!: « There are three categories of these images: oe Approximately 2,100 electronic images and videos seized from Epstein’s electronic devices (which have not been previously provided to you) e Approximately 3,400 electronic images from discs seized from Epstein’s residences in 2019 (which have previously been provided to you and your client for review at the MDC) e Approximately 7 hard copy nude images located in the file from the FBI Florida office’s investigation of Epstein (which have not been previously provided to you) « The FBI will make all three of those categories available to you. The electronic files will be provided on hard drives, and the FBI will provide you with the hard copy images for review as well. e All electronic images should be viewable as thumbnails, except those seized from Apple devices, which must be viewed using Cellebrite. o The Cellebrite software will be provided on the drive for your review of images and videos seized from Apple devices. o The electronic files have the same metadata on the hard drive that was available when the FBI seized each image. For images that were carved or deleted, no metadata was recovered, so none is viewable. For all other images, the metadata recovered should be viewable on the hard drive. eo The approximately 2,100 electronic images and videos seized from Epstein’s devices are separated by folder to indicate which device each image was seized from. « Because these images are considered obscene material, the FBI is not permitted to make duplicates of them, and there is a limited number of clean laptops on which these images can be reviewed. As a result, the FBI is only able to provide a single laptop for review of these images. Regarding the physical evidence: « Attached are two lists of all physical items in the FBI's custody relating to this case. The first list relates to items associated with the FBI Florida office’s investigation of Epstein. The second list relates to items associated with the FBI New York office’s current investigation. « The vast majority of physical evidence in the FBI’s custody is located at the FBI’s warehouse in the Bronx. Two items (1B 77 & 1B 79) are located at 26 Federal Plaza, but the case agents can check those items out from 26 EFTA00015779

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Federal Plaza and bring them to the Bronx warehouse on whatever day you choose to conduct your review so that you will have all evidence in one place. « The FBI is able to arrange for the defense team to review all physical evidence at the Bronx warehouse under the following conditions: e The warehouse requires at least two weeks’ notice in order to pull all of the items for the entire case and place them in a location where a large group of people can view them. oe The warehouse is open during normal business hours between 9am and Spm on weekdays. o Atleast two FBI agents and an AUSA will be present at the Bronx warehouse to assist and answer questions. e The evidence will be placed in a loading dock at the warehouse to provide additional space for the review. To ensure that there is sufficient space, please let me know how many members of the defense team intend to be physically present for this review. e Electronic devices such as cellphones and laptops are not permitted in the warehouse. The defense team may bring a digital camera that is not connected to the Internet or a cellular network into the warehouse. If the defense team wishes to photograph an item of evidence, the defense will need to inform the agents who are present, so that they may confirm that the photographed item is not Highly Confidential based on the presence of nudity. e Electronic media such as VHS tapes, cassette tapes, and CDs will not be playable at the warehouse. « To the extent the defense requests that the FBI bring any physical items to 500 Pear! Street for your client to review, the FBI is prepared to bring items that are reasonably sized to 500 Pearl Street. With respect to bulky or large items, the defense team should be able to photograph those for your client to review, unless they are deemed Highly Confidential, in which case the FBI can make arrangements to transport the item to 500 Pearl Street if necessary. « The FBI is in the process of confirming that it can provide devices to play all of the electronic media in the case ina single location at the FBI’s offices in downtown Manhattan. We are also double-checking to confirm that all media that does not contain witness statements have already been produced to you and your client in discovery. The FBI anticipates that we can arrange for you to review all non-witness statement electronic media at the FBI's office in downtown Manhattan in approximately three weeks. e To the extent you wish to review all of the discs containing photographs, which were seized from Epstein’s residences in 2019, we note that all of those images have already been produced to you in discovery. For your awareness, the FBI has informed me that it took their team several weeks to review all of the images on all of those discs. Please let me know how you wish to proceed. Best, a a Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 PY Ce From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 6:00 PM To: ‘Laura Menninger’ <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; x) <>; (USANYS) <r Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes EFTA00015780

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Laura, | expect to be able to answer all of your questions about the evidence review by tomorrow. We have been looking into the discovery request you made last week, and we hope to have a response ready to provide to you by next week. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Laura Menninger <lmenninger@hmflaw.com> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 3:01 PM Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Now that the FBI team is back, when do you expect to have answers to all of the questions posed? If | had an idea of when you would have answers, it could help me answer your question. Ata minimum, it would not seem to take too much time to know when someone can open the FBI vault and allow the attorneys to make an initial view of the evidence. Also, | understand the FBI did not prepare an inventory of their evidence when they seized it from NY and LSJ, so | don’t think we need to wait for them to now prepare an inventory before we start reviewing evidence. Also, when do you believe you will have a response regarding the discovery | requested last Monday? Thanks, Laura Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue | Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger@hmflaw.com Fron: | < i > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 11:44 AM To: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; TT) (iii >; (USANYS) <a EFTA00015781

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Counsel, The FBI team on this case has been out of the office this week and will not be able to answer all of the questions you asked during our Wednesday call until they are back in the office next week. Please let me know if you would like to wait until all of those questions can be answered to schedule a day for your client to be brought to 500 Pear! Street to review the highly confidential images. My understanding is that the FBI is able to provide at least one laptop containing those highly confidential images in time for such a review to take place on Thursday 5/18, but | may not have the answers to all of your questions about those images before that date, and | do not know whether you will also be able to visit the evidence vault that same week. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. | will reach back out once | have answers to your questions. Thank you, mz Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: ) Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 4:56 PM To: Laura Menninger <imenninger@hmflaw.com>; i!) <i: ; Sas (USANYS) <j Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes That is the only excel spreadsheet indexing physical evidence that we have produced in discovery. That spreadsheet does not include every physical item currently in the FBI's custody related to this case. For example, the August 20, 2020 discovery production also included search warrant returns listing the physical items seized by the FBI’s New York Office during the 2019 searches of Jeffrey Epstein’s residences in New York and the U.S Virgin Islands (see Bates range SDNY_GM_00166007-SDNY_GM_00166043), but they are not contained in a spreadsheet. As a courtesy, | have asked the FBI whether it would be possible to provide us with a similar excel index reflecting the physical evidence seized by the FBI’s New York Office, though it may take some time to compile such an index. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00015782

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

| St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 3:44 PM Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Thank you. Is that the only index of physical evidence available? Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue | Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger@hmflaw.com rom: a <s Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:38 PM To: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; TT) (iii; (USANYS) Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Counsel, In advance of our call tomorrow, | wanted to send a copy of the attached index of physical items in FBI custody from the FBI-Miami office, which we previously produced to you as part of our August 21, 2020 discovery production. Also included in that August 21, 2020 production were scans of numerous items listed on the index. Those scans can be found within Bates range SDNY_GM_00172218-SDNY_GM_00173007. It may be useful to reference some of those items during our conversation tomorrow, so | wanted to make sure you were aware of them. ao i] uw tad ! Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00015783

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:03 PM To: ‘Laura Menninger' <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; i <i -; (USANYS) <j Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Yes, that works for us, thank you very much. We can use the below dial-in: Code: Best, From: Laura Menninger <lmenninger@hmflaw.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:19 AM <<; (USANYS) <> Cc: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Good morning, We are free at 1:30 p.m. ET / 11:30 a.m. MST tomorrow. Would that work? We are generally free thereafter, so please suggest another later time if not. Thank you, Laura Laura A. Menninger | Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. 150 E. 10th Avenue | Denver, CO 80203 +1 303 831 7364 (Office) Imenninger@hmflaw.com (or: | <i Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 8:36 AM To: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com>; TTT (Hii > i (USANYS) <_ Ce: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell(@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Good morning, It would be helpful to have a call to discuss the requests contained in this letter. Are there times tomorrow when you would be available to speak, please? Thank you, EFTA00015784

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Laura Menninger <Imenninger@hmflaw.com> Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 2:03 PM To: A ) <n >; es) <n >; Sn (USANYS) <> Ce: Jeff Pagliuca <jpagliuca@hmflaw.com>; Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com) <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>; 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcsternheim@mac.com> Subject: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Counsel — Please see attached correspondence. -Laura Laura A. Menninger Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Main 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 Imenninger@hmflaw.com www.hmflaw.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving it in any manner. Thank you. EFTA00015785