From: "iE (USANYS) To: EE UsANYs)' Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:54:46 +0000 Attachments: Ex. H_ Sealed.pdf Here it is — Ex H. From: SS (USANYS) <i Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 3:45 PM 0: TS (SANS) <i Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing And can you send me MJ Netburn’s decision? Exhibit I to the def motion, | think From: aS (USANYS) <i Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:58 AM To: A (USANYS) <a Ce: AS (USANYS) <i Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented EEN, the plaintiff in the civil action. The two letters we submitted in connection with our All Writs Application are attached. From: SS (USANyS) <i Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:53 AM 0: ES (SANS) <i Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Another Q: who’s Stan Pottinger? From: TS (USANYS) <i Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:53 AM To: A (USANS) <> Cc: EE (SANS) <i Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing From: ES (USANYS) <i Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM To: a (USANYS) <i > Ce: AS (USANYS) <i Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S? EFTA00015277

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

From: I (USANYS) <i Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM To: AS (USANYS) <> Co: ES (USANYS) <i; ES (USA YS) <a Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing In the spirit of completeness, I’m also attaching their replies. From: SS (USANYS) <i Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM 1: TS (SANS) <a Ce: TS (USANYS) i; IS (SAN YS) <i Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Goodness! Associate U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, S (USANYS) <i wrote: She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court’s page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years. From: aS (SANS) <i Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM 0: AS (SANS) <i Cc: TS (USANYS) i; I (SAS) <r Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law? From: a (USANYS) <i Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM 10: ES (SANS) <a Ce: A (USANYS) i; a (SANS) <i Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Per our discussion, | am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions “at a later time” ahead of trial. Thanks very much. From: SS (USANYS) <i Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM 10: TS (USANYS) <i EFTA00015278

--=PAGE_BREAK=--

Cc: AS (USANYS) <>; TS (USA NYS) <i Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I’m in the office. Or Webex From: es (USANYS) <i Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM To: A (SANS) <i Cc: TS (USANYS) i; a (54S) <i Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Hi’ We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one) related to MM that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next few days, thanks. Chief, Public Corruption Unit U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of New York _ a EFTA00015279